Summary:
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific
library DSOs.
= The Rationale =
This patch is from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to
specific library DSOs.
EAPI was designed to be able to pass
`__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))` for symbols with
GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used
when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported.
MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can
declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but
it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not
work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC.
For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires
correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as
export for everything, you need to declare it as import when
importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally.
With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example
working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global
variables as exported symbols).
Example 1:
dll1:
```
EAPI void foo(void);
EAPI void bar()
{
foo();
}
```
dll2:
```
EAPI void foo()
{
printf ("foo\n");
}
```
This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both
cases and for gcc defining as
`__atttribute__((visibility("default")))`.
However, the following:
Example 2:
dll1:
```
EAPI extern int foo;
EAPI void foobar(void);
EAPI void bar()
{
foo = 5;
foobar();
}
```
dll2:
```
EAPI int foo = 0;
EAPI void foobar()
{
printf ("foo %d\n", foo);
}
```
This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why
LIBAPI is the only solution that works for MSVC.
Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev>
Reviewers: vtorri, woohyun, jptiz, lucas
Reviewed By: vtorri, lucas
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D12214
Three renames are applied here:
Efl.Text.Cursor -> Efl.Text_Cursor.Object (class)
Efl.Text.Cursor_Type -> Efl.Text_Cursor.Type (enum)
Efl.Text.Cursor_Move_Type -> Efl.Text_Cursor.Move_Type (enum)
Nothing changes for the enums on the C side. For the class... Well,
the method names are a bit more verbose now.
These renames are required to avoid clashing with the Efl.Text interface.
This did not cause trouble to C# because interfaces are prefixed with "I",
but it did cause trouble to Eolian when the EO files were installed and
somebody tried to use them.
Ref T8648
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D11663
this is a 1:1 port with minimal changes other than what's necessary to
integrate into the new framework
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D11383
this is consistent with the rest of efl naming
ref T8503
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D11376
these two objects have zero relation, and I don't know why this ever
existed
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D11243
this adds support for creating custom (out of tree) gesture recognizers by
adding an abstract recognizer class that can be inherited and reused
docs TBA
Reviewed-by: woochan lee <wc0917.lee@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D11223
Summary:
In animation classes, "Animation" is not used as a namespace but it is
used as a prefix in the class names.
e.g. Efl.Canvas.Animation_Alpha
However, those classes are basically animation classes with different
features. Therefore, "Animation" should be used as a postfix in the
class names.
e.g. Efl.Canvas.Animation_Alpha -> Efl.Canvas.Alpha_Animation
However, for the easier usage of C APIs, c_prefix of animation classes
are remained to be "efl_animation_xxx".
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n, zmike, Hermet, jsuya
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D11108
Summary:
Since the current Efl.Gesture.Events has canvas gesture events only,
Efl.Gesture.Events should be renamed to Efl.Canvas.Gesture_Events.
If other types of gesture events are newlly required later, which are
not based on canvas, then class Efl.XXX.Gesture_Events is required to
be introduced.
Reviewers: CHAN, segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n, zmike
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D11073
Summary:
Implementation of new Efl.Text.Attribute_Factory class which replace the annotation interface.
Currently, we have two public methods:
```
void efl_text_attribute_factory_attribute_insert(const Efl_Text_Cursor *start, const Efl_Text_Cursor *end, const char *format)
unsigned int efl_text_attribute_factory_attribute_clear(const Efl_Text_Cursor *start, const Efl_Text_Cursor *end);
```
Other methods will be internal methods, for the time being, we will redesign internal methods
Reviewers: woohyun, tasn, segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n, zmike
Subscribers: zmike, q66, cedric, segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n, a.srour, #committers, #reviewers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10646
Summary:
Implementation of new cursor text object.
This Patch Contains :
1- Remove Efl.Text.Cursor & Efl.Text_Markup_Interactive interfaces and replace them with one Class Efl.Text.Cursor
=> there are some modifications on cursor methods
2- Update all related classes to use Efl.Text.Cursor object instead of the old interfaces
3- If class uses Efl.Text_Cursor_Cursor (handle), mainly annotation it will stay as it is until we update other annotations into attribute_factory
4- Add main cursor property into efl.text.interactive
5- Add cursor_new method in efl.ui.text (I think we may move it into efl.text.interactive interface)
There still some parts that need discussion: especially cursor movement functionality, I prefer to move function with Enum, instead of special function for each movement.
```
enum @beta Efl.Text.Cursor_Move_Type
{
[[Text cursor movement types]]
char_next, [[Advances to the next character]]
char_prev, [[Advances to the previous character]]
cluster_next, [[Advances to the next grapheme cluster]]
cluster_prev, [[Advances to the previous grapheme cluster]]
paragraph_start, [[Advances to the first character in this paragraph]]
paragraph_end, [[Advances to the last character in this paragraph]]
word_start, [[Advance to current word start]]
word_end, [[Advance to current word end]]
line_start, [[Advance to current line first character]]
line_end, [[Advance to current line last character]]
paragraph_first, [[Advance to current paragraph first character]]
paragraph_last, [[Advance to current paragraph last character]]
paragraph_next, [[Advances to the start of the next text node]]
paragraph_prev [[Advances to the end of the previous text node]]
}
move {
[[Move the cursor]]
params {
@in type: Efl.Text.Cursor_Move_Type; [[The type of movement]]
}
return: bool; [[True if actually moved]]
}
```
or old way:
```
char_next {
[[Advances to the next character]]
// FIXME: Make the number of characters we moved by? Useful for all the other functions
return: bool; [[True if actually moved]]
}
char_prev {
[[Advances to the previous character]]
return: bool; [[True if actually moved]]
}
char_delete {
[[Deletes a single character from position pointed by given cursor.]]
}
cluster_next {
[[Advances to the next grapheme cluster]]
return: bool; [[True if actually moved]]
}
cluster_prev {
[[Advances to the previous grapheme cluster]]
return: bool; [[True if actually moved]]
}
// FIXME: paragraph_end is inconsistent with word_end. The one goes to the last character and the other after the last character.
paragraph_start {
[[Advances to the first character in this paragraph]]
return: bool; [[True if actually moved]]
}
paragraph_end {
[[Advances to the last character in this paragraph]]
return: bool; [[True if actually moved]]
}
word_start {
[[Advance to current word start]]
return: bool; [[True if actually moved]]
}
word_end {
[[Advance to current word end]]
return: bool; [[True if actually moved]]
}
line_start {
[[Advance to current line first character]]
return: bool; [[True if actually moved]]
}
line_end {
[[Advance to current line last character]]
return: bool; [[True if actually moved]]
}
paragraph_first {
[[Advance to current paragraph first character]]
return: bool; [[True if actually moved]]
}
paragraph_last {
[[Advance to current paragraph last character]]
return: bool; [[True if actually moved]]
}
paragraph_next {
[[Advances to the start of the next text node]]
return: bool; [[True if actually moved]]
}
paragraph_prev {
[[Advances to the end of the previous text node]]
return: bool; [[True if actually moved]]
}
```
Reviewers: woohyun, tasn, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: woohyun
Subscribers: a.srour, bu5hm4n, segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10542
this now all migrated to Efl.Canvas.Object.Animation
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10667
Summary:
The internal and the API we would like is mostly a canvas API. A lot of the code
in evas is working around the fact that efl_input_device is not defined inside Evas.
This patch is the first step to try to clean this up.
Depends on D10487
Reviewers: zmike, raster, bu5hm4n, Hermet
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T8321
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10488
Summary:
Efl.Gfx.Vg.Value_Provider is an object for integrating and managing the properties of vector objects.
These values are dependent on the keypath.
Keypath is the target a specific content or a set of contents that will be updated.
It can include the specific name of the contents, wildcard(*) or Globstar(**).
The valueProvider is borrowed from another library that uses a vector object of type json, such as Efl.Ui.Animation_View
(5fc0e59e0c/lottie-swift/src/Public/iOS/AnimatedControl.swift (L50))
This feature should be used with some patches that apply to the vg json loader and Efl.Canvas.Vg.Object.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: Hermet, kimcinoo, smohanty
Reviewed By: Hermet
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9874
this includes all the efl.canvas headers and adds some compilation tests
for the header to the unit test suite
ref T8274
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10226