All these individual init functions are getting messy, some modules
lack them and it's easy to get inconsistent. Safety check needs error
and log, but these need safety checks as well, some modules (lalloc,
rbtree and others) use safety checks but provide no _init().
I want to know if we really gain something to init individual
modules. It should not be that expensive as init should not allocate
heavy resources and the recommendation is to call eina_init() so most
users will do that anyway.
If people agree I'll unmark all *_init() as EAPI and make them private
to eina lib.
SVN revision: 42214
safety checks will report null pointers and other error conditions on
public api's and can be disabled by compile time check.
note that in order to have these checks working we need to make
EINA_ARG_NONNULL() void, otherwise GCC can remove these checks since
they're known to be false.
This commit also make two minor changes:
* list and hash accessors and iterators are created even for empty
entities. This is correct in my point of view since NULL should
indicate error. Having these in were an optimziation, but not
worth it, these are not the most common case and hitting this path
is not of much cost.
* unmarked some parameters as nonnull, mainly on list and inlist.
SVN revision: 38327
* reorganize a bit more. it's not finished
* fix spellingg and formatting
* gnuplot file names generated by our bechmarks tests have an
absolute time description and not H:M:S description, as this
breaks the check out of the repo on Windows.
SVN revision: 36090