This patch will make the CollectionView remember at all time the last
focus object and the last item in the list.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10677
there was the request that this needs to be documented, here we are.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10874
edje will not take over this part, edje will just reparent it to the ML
and go on.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10839
Once the object are created, the CollectionView will do a few modifiction on them before
giving this object to the position manager to deal with. Reducing events should slightly
improve performance.
Reviewed-by: SangHyeon Jade Lee <sh10233.lee@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10686
assign signed int value on bigger unsigned variable
can make information of the varaible lost.
this patch fix the problem.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10723
this commit merges common functions from efl_ui_multi_selectable and
efl_ui_multi_selectable_async. Additionally, the two different aspects
of accessing the elements in a multi_selectable widget (numerical or
object based) are now abstracted into interfaces called range_numeric and
range_object. numeric APIs are also prefixed with id's, so its possible
for one widget to implement both (if there will ever be the demand to do
that in future).
The main reason for this split is:
- there is no good common path between mvvm based multi_selectable and
object based multi_Selectable, so there is no way that both sides would
benefit, without the other one suffering.
- If we find later on the demand to implement both on one widget, we now
can fully do that
- Common API is available for both types, so its less API and less
confusion for the API user.
ref T7871
ref T8265
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10675
This patch use volatile model to make sure that a model is properly cleaned once it is not
used anymore.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10625
Figuring out why model fetch was sometime not working recursively allow to
reduce the amount of request that need to be made. In this case, notifying
the position manager or lack of notification was triggering a case where the
item would not show up (Joice of nested asynchronous behavior).
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10624
Efl.Model can be nested and Efl.Ui.CollectionView use this ability. Listening
on the nested model instead of the nester model can lead to event being triggered
that shouldn't. Better listen on the top model.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10621
This fix adding item not always showing up in the CollectionView right away.
The main issue comes down to the fact we can not chain a new request when one
is already resolved partially. The code now make sure to properly do this.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10614
efl_ui_position_manager_entity_entities_ready is expecting the end offset and not the
length of how many items have been updated. Sending the correct number fixes the problem.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Reviewed-by: SangHyeon Jade Lee <sh10233.lee@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10590
This should silence 32-bit warnings about long long stuff
Reviewers: vtorri, cedric, bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10214
this is just a button and not the full clickable struct
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10198
Summary:
with this commit that api for single and multi selectable shares the
same prefix, which makes sense in c as we do not really differ between
those two types there anyway.
ref T7871
Reviewers: SanghyeonLee, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7871
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10183
with this commit you can more or less use focus. The only uncaught case
for now is that if the object is not available, no focus can be set.
Navigating with focus on the screen however should be possible.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9969
The idea of this widget is to provide to MVVM what Efl.Ui.Collection provide and
leverage the same shared logic for layout.
Co-authored-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike@samsung.com>
Co-authored-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9958
Elyes HAOUAS
Cedric BAIL
Marcel Hollerbach
Wonki Kim
Lauro Moura
Mike Blumenkrantz