Summary:
This clarifies a bit the whole Orientation vs. Direction confusion, at the
expense of longer names (Image_Orientation vs. Layout_Orientation).
Also, the interfaces are now adjectives (Orientable) and the enums have long
names (*_Orientation).
Pretty big patch, but no functional changes.
Relates to T7863
Test Plan:
Everything builds and passes tests.
Elementary_tests show same behavior, including the "inverted" widgets, which
are the only parts which received a bit of code changes.
Proof:
https://travis-ci.org/Enlightenment/efl/builds/536277282
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, cedric
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8946
Summary:
- Changed beta methods guards from CLASS_NAME_GUARD to
EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT to use the same scheme as C.
- Removed some includes to Efl_Ui.h from the examples. These were
causing C's efl_part_get to not be generated due to EFL_PART_PROTECTED
not being yet defined (it is defined in Elementary.hh, included
afterwards). This was leading to Efl.Part.impl.hh trying to use a
non-existent method.
Fixes T7716 partially (missing stringshare issue)
Test Plan: make examples
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt, felipealmeida, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7716
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8284
it looks like people have been relying on Elementary.h to include
eo apis even though this obviously makes no sense
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8223
Summary:
these hints are not strictly size-related, so renaming them is more consistent
with their actual function
ref T7563
Depends on D7968
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, cedric, bu5hm4n
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7563
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7977
Summary:
If widget use both hint_align(HINT_FILL) and hint_max together, there is no way
to set to hint_align. See, elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box' -
"Button with a quite long text." button. you can control button position
using "Box align" slider, but this is not proper implementation. When there are
two widget which have hint_align(HINT_FILL) and hint_max, those positions are
determined by box_align rather than hint_align. it means widget align cannot be
set individually.
To solve this problem, this patch add hint_fill property. in order to avoid
conflict with legacy API named evas_object_size_hint_fill_set(), it only works
for EO widgets(made by efl_add).
Also, EFL_GFX_SIZE_HINT_FILL is removed.
@feature
Test Plan:
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Hermet, Jaehyun_Cho, raster, barbieri
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T3912
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7409
Unlike Elm_Slider, Efl.Ui.Slider does not support text_set,
format_cb_set, and format_string_set.
To support Efl.Ui.Slider, slider cxx example is modified.
The fix is not complete. We need to make efl_part() work nicely in C++:
- Get the refs work properly (maybe without auto-del)
- Generate the parts from the EO file as methods on the object
Final form should be close to:
slider.indicator().format_string_set("%1.2f");
Where everything autocompletes nicely :)
make examples now builds all c++ examples but some of them are in fact
empty skeletons. Those either need some c++ love or the final eo api to
be ready (eg. menu, popup, ...).
I removed some examples that don't have an exact equivalent in EO since
the widget is legacy only.
Reasons:
- This API has been confused with the min size of the widget, resulting
in badly laid out applications.
- The EO API was not very nice (Range is about numbers, the Gfx size
hint in a part is really ugly).
While I understand the value of this API and how it can be used in
scalable applications, it is in fact not absolutely necessary.
Alternatively to that span size, the widget min size can already be
defined from the application side, or the widget can simply be expanded
to fill in its parent.
This can obviously be reinstated later if the need arises for EO. For
now, keep this feature as legacy-only.