Summary:
This commits prepares the tree in order to mess with the events in the
Efl.Ui.Clickable event. Events which have been emitted in a none legacy
widget, are now emitted either with evas, when the widget is legacy due
to inheritance. Or via the normal event and normal event functions.
In case the widget is a legacy only widget (not used at all in the new
api), then the events are for now emitted with
evas_object_smart_callback_call.
Cases where event handlers have been added to legacy widgets, smart
events are now used, and not the eo one anymore.
ref T7844
Depends on D8813
Reviewers: cedric, zmike, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7844
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8816
since commit a1addad60e, To add myself as a sub object of parent object will be
done in Efl.Ui.Widget constructor.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8280
before the widget_parent have been only set once. The call to the set
was in the constructor and carried the efl_parent. In the next commit
widget_parent is getting a refactor, which gives it more meaning, where
it is actaully called, which means, the behaviour will change. In order
to not break every existing usage of the here changed widgets, we move
the code to the constructor, and feed it with the efl_parent, just like
before.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8041
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8175
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8131
Summary:
now that the error codes have been change to be compatible with eina_error,
this can be removed and will work through eina_error naturally
fix T7718
Depends on D8067
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7718
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8068
Summary:
this swaps the values of "no error" and "error" in order to maintain
consistency with the rest of efl where the zero value means "no error"
Depends on D8060
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8063
Summary:
Efl.Ui.Theme class is required to support language bindings.
Efl.Ui.Theme works based on current elm_theme features.
This patch fixes T7357.
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, cedric, lauromoura, woohyun, zmike, SanghyeonLee
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi, SanghyeonLee
Subscribers: SanghyeonLee, herdsman, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7357
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7244
The interface efl_part_get should not be directly called from C, but the efl_part
wrapper should. It rely on efl_noref to properly destroy the object. Binding can
control the lifecycle of the reference the way they want by either calling the
wrapper or efl_part_get directly. It also means that the ugly ___efl_auto_unref_set
doesn't need to be exposed outside of EFL anymore.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6098
This changes a lot of things all across the EFL. Previously,
methods tagged @const had both their external prototype and
internal impl generated with const on object, while property
getters only had const on the external API. This is now changed
and it all has const everywhere.
Ref T6859.
Summary:
focus_user and focus_object are similar classes. by merging them into
one mixin, we can maintain consistency.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: bu5hm4n
Subscribers: cedric, Jaehyun_Cho, woohyun, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5734
This thing is used by only 2 EO APIs that are marked as @beta. I wonder
if the @beta tag or the ptr() expression made it work for eolian,
because it simply wasn't defined in EO.
I'm renaming it just so that it's more consistent with the new names
used by atspi (and EO API in general).
This will be used to solve issues around style_set:
if the widget is legacy or pure eo we may need to select a different
style. So in the constructor we need to know whether we are legacy or
eo. Note that calling style_set in finalize only is too late as we would
lose information such as efl_text_set() called inside efl_add().
The string comparison was invalid for full part names. It worked with
the aliases, by chance, not by design.
This got broken by eee60abbcf but using full part names from the
application side was already broken before that.
@fix
This means that ALL part handles inherit from the base part class
Efl.Ui.Widget.Part. Layout is the only exception where Efl.Part is
specially overridden.
This is a first step towards generic part APIs, including background in
all widgets.
For this patch I decided to add a pseudo legacy wrapper as the function
is called in a very large number of places. Fixing all those calls to
use the size2d form is a lot of work and a greater risk of b0rking
something.
In Edje and Elementary, we have part objects, which are what is returned
by the interface efl_part(). Those objects can't be of an opaque type as
this doesn't work nicely with strongly typed languages such as C++ or
C#. In JS, Lua, C the types are weak and mostly runtime-based so it
doesn't matter much.
As a consequence, the documentation and the types need to look nice in
this EO API. Thus, we remove the abusive term "internal" and explicitly
call all those classes "part" something.
Eventually we want the types to be declared in the EO file so bindings
(C#, C++, ...) can generate the proper access methods, returning the
best possible types.
Note that right now a few of those part types are used in the legacy API
but don't actually need to be exposed externally.
This is kind of a mega commit that does all the renaming at once, but
it's really just a big sed operation. The power of good IDEs :)
Ref T5315
Ref T5306
Also prefix with widget.
I want to rename this as child rather than sub. It's inconsistent with
the other parent/child hierarchies. Anyway the various hierarchies are
confusing, so let's keep this name :)
Ref T5363
it turns out to be very handy to have a interface for the moving and
border elements, that is unconnected to the way of how widgets are
registering themself.
This for example enables us to get a simple focus manager that just
redirects the call into a internal 2 dimensional data struct
Some names have not been changed, hopefully making a distinction
between legacy APIs and internal code (elm_layout_blah) and valid EO
usages.
This means many internal functions are still elm_layout_ as their
sole purpose is to support the legacy API.
Ref T5315
elm_layout_sizing_eval() marks an object as requiring recalc.
Unfortunately, it's been massively abused by various widgets into
actually doing the calc, or the min calc. So we end up with one API
that has 3 different definitions depending on the widget type:
1. Mark as requiring recalc (correct, respects doc, elm_layout)
2. Calculate min size and other size hints
3. Actually do some geometry modification
I believe we need to clarify these 3 requirements into 3 very clear
and specific APIs in elementary. Right now we have similar functions
in evas for 1 (evas_object_smart_changed) and 3 (smart_calculate).
But their exact definition also isn't necessarily what we want for
elementary.
Another clear problem is that layout_eval does not do any calculation
(in theory), so the "eval" word is a bit of a stretch here.
Once we're sure about the exact API we want, we can add this back to
EO and make it work across our EO widgets. For now let's just keep
the legacy API, and its EO overrides, as is.
Ref T5315
Summary:
The changes of previous patch (4ea7effe70)
are reverted, and item calculation is fixed correctly.
The main reason why hoversel item has wrong size in screen rotation is
that hover doesn't update geometry when the size of target object is changed.
Test Plan: elementary_test -to hoversel
Reviewers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4556
Signed-off-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
After reverting 8a21384759, I figured out how to move
the main menu back to the border group. This time the menu is in the
framespace and its layout algos have been adapted to allow non-zero
root coordinates.
This is an override of efl_gfx_size_set. Same as before, the
order of operations matter so it is possible that a corner
case will break. In particular, legacy code was:
- intercept
- smart resize (do stuff), super, super, super
- evas object resize
The new code is more like:
- intercept
- super, super, super, evas object resize
- do stuff
But unfortunately this broke elm_widget (read: all widgets) as
the internal resize was done before the object resize. So,
inside the resize event cb, the resize_obj size would not match
the smart object size. >_<
Marcel Hollerbach
Yeongjong Lee
Mike Blumenkrantz
Chris Michael
Jaehyun Cho
Cedric BAIL
Xavi Artigas
Daniel Kolesa
Yeongjong Lee
Amitesh Singh
Marcel Hollerbach
Lukasz Stanislawski
Jean-Philippe Andre
Lukasz Stanislawski
Marcel Hollerbach
Jee-Yong Um