Summary:
For now, how to check whether a widget is legacy or not
is to check flags in private data or static flag, which is set
during elm_legacy_add.
If Efl.Ui.Legacy interface is added, it can be easilly checked
by efl_isa(obj, EFL_UI_LEGACY_INTERFACE)
Reviewers: woohyun, jpeg, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: conr2d, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5748
#finally
For now we focus the widgets of a item, the item content can be cycled
by tab / Ctrl + tab. up/down/right/left are for now handled by gengrid
and move the focused item (everything else feels super weird with
multiple contents in a item)
ref T6181
This region has little to do with focus, as it's more of a region of
interest within the widget, and not directly related to the highlight
geometry, for instance. It's related to focus in the sense that only
widgets with focus would really care about this region.
I decided to change this name after talking with @bu5hm4n.
Note that gengrid uses this but is also completely broken (the focus
highlight floats around and you don't even see the focused item).
Note: This is very close to show_region but I'm not sure those can be
merged safely (since the default "focus_region" is NULL while the
default "show_region" is the widget's geometry).
Ref T5363
I was told that the scrollable interface is being redesigned for EO.
This API definitely does not belong to the base Widget class, as it's
quite specific to item-based scrollable widgets, such as lists and
grids. Since Elm.Interface_Scrollable is itself being revamped, it is a
good place to move that EO API for now.
Ref T5363
This is also another protected and beta API. Meant to be overridden by
subclasses, but belongs to a still unstable API.
The difference between the internal legacy and the EO API is really bad.
Same as with activate (previous commit).
Ref T5363
Some names have not been changed, hopefully making a distinction
between legacy APIs and internal code (elm_layout_blah) and valid EO
usages.
This means many internal functions are still elm_layout_ as their
sole purpose is to support the legacy API.
Ref T5315
elm_layout_sizing_eval() marks an object as requiring recalc.
Unfortunately, it's been massively abused by various widgets into
actually doing the calc, or the min calc. So we end up with one API
that has 3 different definitions depending on the widget type:
1. Mark as requiring recalc (correct, respects doc, elm_layout)
2. Calculate min size and other size hints
3. Actually do some geometry modification
I believe we need to clarify these 3 requirements into 3 very clear
and specific APIs in elementary. Right now we have similar functions
in evas for 1 (evas_object_smart_changed) and 3 (smart_calculate).
But their exact definition also isn't necessarily what we want for
elementary.
Another clear problem is that layout_eval does not do any calculation
(in theory), so the "eval" word is a bit of a stretch here.
Once we're sure about the exact API we want, we can add this back to
EO and make it work across our EO widgets. For now let's just keep
the legacy API, and its EO overrides, as is.
Ref T5315
Since this was moved into the two genlist and gengrid files I get
redefinition warnings during the build and when generating the docs
eolian actually errors out on me and stops parsing.
This moves one enum from EO to legacy only (Ecore_Pos_Map).
Ideally the type should be in Ecore_Legacy and no Common, that
can be done later.
Ref T5522
This may be a bit more controversial...
But Evas_Coord really is just an int and all the internals
of EFL assume that the base coordinate type is a 32-bit int.
So this type is a bit redondant and can't easily be changed
to, say, a float or int64.
Ref T5312
Now you can't use the same syntax as you would for a method to
implement a property as whole, instead you need to specify the
getter and/or setter explicitly. This is to allow parent classes
to expand their properties without altering behavior of the child
classes.
Summary:
Elm.Widget.event_callback_add conflicts with Efl.Object.event_callback_add.
To solve this problem, "widget_" prefix is added to methods starting with
"event".
Reviewers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4521
This is an override of efl_gfx_size_set. Same as before, the
order of operations matter so it is possible that a corner
case will break. In particular, legacy code was:
- intercept
- smart resize (do stuff), super, super, super
- evas object resize
The new code is more like:
- intercept
- super, super, super, evas object resize
- do stuff
But unfortunately this broke elm_widget (read: all widgets) as
the internal resize was done before the object resize. So,
inside the resize event cb, the resize_obj size would not match
the smart object size. >_<
This is an override of efl_gfx_position_set.
As for the other patches, I hope I didn't break anything.
A problem likely to happen is that the super call was inserted
too early or too late in the call flow. For instance:
_myclass_position_set(obj, x, y) {
position_set(super(obj), x, y);
position_get(obj, &prevx, &prevy);
do_something_with_delta_xy();
}
The above code flow is obvisouly wrong, but may have crept in this
patch (such a bug sneaked in inside smart object, breaking
everything at first).
This lets me narrow down the remaining cases of pointers across the EFL.
The void pointers will later need to be reevaluated on per-case basis and
replaced appropriately where possible/feasible.
Complex types (i.e. list, array, hash, accessor etc.) now do not require
pointers with them anymore (the pointer is implied) and the same goes for
class handles. Eolian now explicitly disallows creating pointers to these
as well. This is the first part of the work to remove pointers from Eolian
completely, with the goal of simplifying the DSL (higher level) and therefore
making it easier for bindings (as well as easier API usage).
@feature
Previously events used to use class name as a prefix and ignored eo_prefix
when specified. This is no longer the case. Events follow eo_prefix by default
now. In order to get around this for classes where this is undesirable, a new
field event_prefix was added which takes priority over eo_prefix. If neither
is specified, class name is used like previously.
@feature
Xavi Artigas
Lauro Moura
Mike Blumenkrantz
Sungtaek Hong
Amitesh Singh
Marcel Hollerbach
Lukasz Stanislawski
Daniel Kolesa
Jean-Philippe Andre
Marcel Hollerbach
Lukasz Stanislawski
Stefan Schmidt
Vyacheslav Reutskiy
Jee-Yong Um
Tom Hacohen