there is one function that needs to be implemented by the inheritor of
Efl.Ui.Focus.Object and that is focus_parent, otherwise child_focus
cannot be propagated correctly. This is now achived correctly for all
widgets.
This fixes from elm_object_focus_get results for toolbar and calendar.
Segmentcontrol inherits from the class, however, the widget itself does
not allow focus, so its never registered probebly.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7331
Summary:
Legacy menu toolbar and ctxpopup are not new efl interface widget,
but it have efl interfaces, efl_ui_item and efl_ui_menu.
if we plan to implement this two, it should be a class not a interface,
so I remove it on legacy widget.
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5939
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
For now, how to check whether a widget is legacy or not
is to check flags in private data or static flag, which is set
during elm_legacy_add.
If Efl.Ui.Legacy interface is added, it can be easilly checked
by efl_isa(obj, EFL_UI_LEGACY_INTERFACE)
Reviewers: woohyun, jpeg, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: conr2d, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5748
Summary: This introduces a new focus system and the migration to this system.
Test Plan: run elementary_test
Reviewers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4511
Now you can't use the same syntax as you would for a method to
implement a property as whole, instead you need to specify the
getter and/or setter explicitly. This is to allow parent classes
to expand their properties without altering behavior of the child
classes.
Summary:
efl_ui_menu interface provides common functions of menu, toolbar and ctxpopup.
efl_ui_item interface provides common functions of menu_item, toolbar_item and ctxpopup_item.
Also implemented some missing functions like selected_item set/get in ctxpopup.
efl_ui_item interface should be used for other widget items as well.
Test Plan: elementary_test
Reviewers: jpeg, felipealmeida, raster, SanghyeonLee, cedric, yashu21985
Subscribers: bu5hm4n
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3897
This lets me narrow down the remaining cases of pointers across the EFL.
The void pointers will later need to be reevaluated on per-case basis and
replaced appropriately where possible/feasible.
Complex types (i.e. list, array, hash, accessor etc.) now do not require
pointers with them anymore (the pointer is implied) and the same goes for
class handles. Eolian now explicitly disallows creating pointers to these
as well. This is the first part of the work to remove pointers from Eolian
completely, with the goal of simplifying the DSL (higher level) and therefore
making it easier for bindings (as well as easier API usage).
@feature
Marcel Hollerbach
Cedric BAIL
Xavi Artigas
SangHyeon Lee
Mike Blumenkrantz
Sungtaek Hong
Lukasz Stanislawski
Marcel Hollerbach
Daniel Kolesa
Amitesh Singh
Stefan Schmidt
Tom Hacohen
Jean-Philippe Andre
Ji-Youn Park