Summary:
Change summary:
Removed :
- efl_ui_text_selectable.eo and add it functionality into efl_text_interactive.eo
- efl_ui_text_editable.eo because it is same as efl_ui_text.eo (just set one property by default)
Modifications:
- Move all Text Input enums and functionality from efl_ui_text class into its own interface, this interface will be implemented at efl_ui_internal_text_interactive class.
- Rename selection_allowed property to selectable (same as other "editable" property) in efl_text_interactive
- Add select_all function into efl_text_interactive interface
- Add have_selection property into efl_text_interactive interface
- Move user_change , selection_start/change/clear and undo/redo events into efl_text_interactive interface.
- Move methods and events of copy/paste/cut into efl_ui_text
- Fix password-related functionality
- Remove context menu clear and add_item methods. (these should be added later with better design)
- Remove Validation event from EFL_UI_TEXT. (these should be added later with better design)
Reviewers: woohyun, tasn, segfaultxavi, zmike, bu5hm4n
Subscribers: stefan_schmidt, a.srour, q66, zmike, segfaultxavi, cedric
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10711
this commit merges common functions from efl_ui_multi_selectable and
efl_ui_multi_selectable_async. Additionally, the two different aspects
of accessing the elements in a multi_selectable widget (numerical or
object based) are now abstracted into interfaces called range_numeric and
range_object. numeric APIs are also prefixed with id's, so its possible
for one widget to implement both (if there will ever be the demand to do
that in future).
The main reason for this split is:
- there is no good common path between mvvm based multi_selectable and
object based multi_Selectable, so there is no way that both sides would
benefit, without the other one suffering.
- If we find later on the demand to implement both on one widget, we now
can fully do that
- Common API is available for both types, so its less API and less
confusion for the API user.
ref T7871
ref T8265
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10675
these require legacy types and headers, which should not be brought into
this header
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10235
Summary:
with this commit that api for single and multi selectable shares the
same prefix, which makes sense in c as we do not really differ between
those two types there anyway.
ref T7871
Reviewers: SanghyeonLee, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7871
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10183
multi_selectable_aync already changed name as
selected_iterator_new
so multi_selectable change name also for unity of API.
not sure about we need unselected_items_get in multi_selectable,
so skip to create new api for this time.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10148
normally when you create a window, you just want to have it beeing a
basic window. If not you still can set the window type.
ref T8229
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10049
this should get a better solution later on. There is also no real usage
for that.
ref T7922
Reviewed-by: SangHyeon Jade Lee <sh10233.lee@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9985
there are not enough size hints, we should add more!
I mixed up which size hints i should have used here, after some back and
forth it turns out that i should use the combined. This fixes the list
example.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9779
this is ideally a bit more clear and flexible than the previous enum names
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9691
right now they are just thin wrappers from what have been in
efl_ui_collection. This is just a first effort, the interfaces have to
be equipped with more and better API, more events, and tests.
ref T8057
Reviewed-by: SangHyeon Jade Lee <sh10233.lee@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9515
this is meant to be implemented by entities that *can* be selectabled
(not to be confused with containers that can have selected contents)!
ref T8057
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9503
this has nothing usefull in it. Additionally, future commits will brings
up another design where there is a central default item style, which can
be hinted.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9394
This also refactors the example a little bit.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9385
This is a bit of a giant commit. However, the problem here is that
cleaning up the API went hand in hand with rewriting most of the usages.
In the process of renewing and removing old API the following was done:
- Legacy API testcases have been ported back to smart callbacks
- EO-API testcases have been ported to efl_add syntax
- weird event #defines have been removed
- Wrong constructor usage has been removed
- Ported to the new box object introduced before
- removed legacy API from efl_ui_radio
-> no more ptr(int) q66 will do jumps of happiness
-> no more ununderstandable group_add methods
-> Seperated code in blocks only for legacy, and blocks only for
non-legacy
To verify this commit, you can check all the tests that have been
touched here. Additionally, the cxx example has been adjusted
ref T7867
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9060
Summary:
legacy full style item is introduced Efl.Ui.ListEmptyItem Class in new Efl Interface,
but using "Empty" name is too ambiguous to present style usage.
Thanks to @cedric and @segfaultxavi,
I found better name for this class, Efl.Ui.ListPlaceHolderItem,
as item hold the place which need to be replaced and relayouted by user generated content.
Depends on D8582
Reviewers: cedric, segfaultxavi, eagleeye
Reviewed By: eagleeye
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, segfaultxavi, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9034
Summary:
Most of item-based class will have similar efl.part such as text, icon, end.
creating this efl part per each class will be very hard to maintaining the class
and unnecessary eo generation.
so combine them in efl.parts of efl_ui_item.
sub item classes can use this efl.part by declairing ther own eo definition.
Reviewers: cedric, Jaehyun_Cho, segfaultxavi, eagleeye
Reviewed By: cedric, eagleeye
Subscribers: herb, woohyun, q66, lauromoura, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8582
Summary:
This clarifies a bit the whole Orientation vs. Direction confusion, at the
expense of longer names (Image_Orientation vs. Layout_Orientation).
Also, the interfaces are now adjectives (Orientable) and the enums have long
names (*_Orientation).
Pretty big patch, but no functional changes.
Relates to T7863
Test Plan:
Everything builds and passes tests.
Elementary_tests show same behavior, including the "inverted" widgets, which
are the only parts which received a bit of code changes.
Proof:
https://travis-ci.org/Enlightenment/efl/builds/536277282
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, cedric
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8946
Summary:
this was conflicting with a model event. Prefixing it with "item,"
resolves this, and describes better what it does.
Depends on D8413
Reviewers: zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8414
Summary:
This reverts commit f629f11bed.
This breaks legacy events. As the selected event is used in legacy
widgets. Also this commits mixed up two different concepts, selection in
a entry etc. and selection of a item.
Depends on D8411
Reviewers: zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8412
Summary:
Since we're now going to be shipping some eo classes as stable,
there is no point in keeping the eo api behind a macro, and it
should be enabled by default. Another case is beta classes, but
those are behind the EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT guard.
This also changes includes around the place where things are
clearly broken (such as an included header needing something
from another header but that other header being guarded, notably
efl_ui_widget.h needing focus manager but focus manager being
behind beta in Elementary.h)
Reviewers: zmike, cedric, bu5hm4n, stefan_schmidt, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: cedric, segfaultxavi
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8322
it looks like people have been relying on Elementary.h to include
eo apis even though this obviously makes no sense
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8223
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8120
Summary:
the previous implementation/api had a number of issues:
* "file" property contained both "file" and "key" values
- also performed file loading operation
* "load_error" property which was specific to image objects
* no methods for controlling file loading/unloading
this patch attempts the following changes:
* split "file" property into "file" and "key" properties
- also remove "key" from existing "mmap" property
* remove "load_error"
* directly return error codes from operations
* add "load" and "unload" methods for directly controlling load state
* add implicit file loading if file/mmap is set during construction
* rewrite all efl.file implementations to move file loading into load() method
* rewrite all usage of efl.file api based on these changes
* add C extension functions to mimic previous behavior
ref T7577
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n, cedric
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: vitor.sousa, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7577
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8018
Summary:
these hints are not strictly size-related, so renaming them is more consistent
with their actual function
ref T7563
Depends on D7968
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, cedric, bu5hm4n
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7563
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7977
Summary:
If widget use both hint_align(HINT_FILL) and hint_max together, there is no way
to set to hint_align. See, elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box' -
"Button with a quite long text." button. you can control button position
using "Box align" slider, but this is not proper implementation. When there are
two widget which have hint_align(HINT_FILL) and hint_max, those positions are
determined by box_align rather than hint_align. it means widget align cannot be
set individually.
To solve this problem, this patch add hint_fill property. in order to avoid
conflict with legacy API named evas_object_size_hint_fill_set(), it only works
for EO widgets(made by efl_add).
Also, EFL_GFX_SIZE_HINT_FILL is removed.
@feature
Test Plan:
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Hermet, Jaehyun_Cho, raster, barbieri
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T3912
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7409
Summary:
most usage of simple list, items are very limited and loading performance is not serious.
to support those requirement, this efl.ui.list will create scrollable box with efl.pack.
user can create list by packing an pre-loaded item object, Efl.Ui.List.Item class.
Test Plan: tested in efl_ui_list_example_1.c in examples.
Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida
Subscribers: woohyun, Jaehyun_Cho
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5861
Summary:
model based list need to be under the namespace of 'Efl.Ui.View".
thus, I renamed 'Efl.Ui.List' to 'Efl.Ui.View.List' properly.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5855
Yeongjong Lee
Ali Alzyod
Marcel Hollerbach
Mike Blumenkrantz
SangHyeon Jade Lee
Xavi Artigas
WooHyun Jung
Daniel Kolesa
Christopher Michael
Carsten Haitzler
Cedric BAIL
Larry Jr
Stefan Schmidt
Felipe Magno de Almeida