Summary:
For now, how to check whether a widget is legacy or not
is to check flags in private data or static flag, which is set
during elm_legacy_add.
If Efl.Ui.Legacy interface is added, it can be easilly checked
by efl_isa(obj, EFL_UI_LEGACY_INTERFACE)
Reviewers: woohyun, jpeg, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: conr2d, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5748
This will be used to replace the part translation API in Elm.Widget. It
should work for both parts and non-parts (ie. the main text of a button,
for instance).
For now I'm taking the following approach:
- All efl_text_set/get strings are untranslatable, i.e. get() returns
the visible string, set replaces and can not be translated.
- translatable_text_set/get needs to be used to enable automatic
translation, which in turns calls efl_text_set to modify the visible
string. Thus, translatable applications will have to use
efl_ui_translatable_text_set a lot more than efl_text_set, unless
they translate strings application-side.
Note that some other frameworks take a simpler approach equivalent to
calling efl_text_set() with an already translated text. This prevents
runtime language changes of the application, unless the application
handles them specifically.
Summary:
Elm.Widget.event_callback_add conflicts with Efl.Object.event_callback_add.
To solve this problem, "widget_" prefix is added to methods starting with
"event".
Reviewers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4521
These should be just overrides of Efl.Gfx.visible.set. Many
widgets were handling smart show() and hide() manually, which
means this patch is quite large.
Hopefully this doesn't break anything, obviously. But here are
some widgets known to be problematic, as the old code flow was
really strange (sometimes not calling the efl_super function):
- window
- notify
This lets me narrow down the remaining cases of pointers across the EFL.
The void pointers will later need to be reevaluated on per-case basis and
replaced appropriately where possible/feasible.
Complex types (i.e. list, array, hash, accessor etc.) now do not require
pointers with them anymore (the pointer is implied) and the same goes for
class handles. Eolian now explicitly disallows creating pointers to these
as well. This is the first part of the work to remove pointers from Eolian
completely, with the goal of simplifying the DSL (higher level) and therefore
making it easier for bindings (as well as easier API usage).
@feature
Previously events used to use class name as a prefix and ignored eo_prefix
when specified. This is no longer the case. Events follow eo_prefix by default
now. In order to get around this for classes where this is undesirable, a new
field event_prefix was added which takes priority over eo_prefix. If neither
is specified, class name is used like previously.
@feature
This removes the conflicts between the different parents and also
indicates that this is to be used internally by widgets and should
not be confused with the normal user visible parent.
It is an internal attribute that should not be used by people
not implementing widgets. Marking it as protected signifies it
as such.
Mike Blumenkrantz
Sungtaek Hong
Amitesh Singh
Lukasz Stanislawski
Lukasz Stanislawski
Jean-Philippe Andre
Jee-Yong Um
Daniel Kolesa
Stefan Schmidt
Tom Hacohen
Cedric BAIL