Summary:
now that the error codes have been change to be compatible with eina_error,
this can be removed and will work through eina_error naturally
fix T7718
Depends on D8067
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7718
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8068
Summary:
this swaps the values of "no error" and "error" in order to maintain
consistency with the rest of efl where the zero value means "no error"
Depends on D8060
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8063
Summary:
Efl.Ui.Theme class is required to support language bindings.
Efl.Ui.Theme works based on current elm_theme features.
This patch fixes T7357.
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, cedric, lauromoura, woohyun, zmike, SanghyeonLee
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi, SanghyeonLee
Subscribers: SanghyeonLee, herdsman, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7357
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7244
Summary:
What happened before is that we registered efl_ui_leyout_legacy for
"elm_layout", which is not that good, since checking a (lets say) elm_button, for the type "elm_layout" would result in false. The same is with elm_button.
fixes T7081
Reviewers: devilhorns, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7081
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6430
Summary:
A call to efl_data_Scope_get is actually quite dangerous,
efl_data_scope_get will return a pointer to a 0 sized segment in memory,
this is happening based on how the class data is organized. So in theory
you could use this pointer and accidently write to it. This resolves
this issue.
Reviewers: devilhorns, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6337
This reverts commit 1b245787fe.
This is a workaround patch, even occurs a regression bug that
breaks widget signal emission logic. (Happened in Enventor toolbar)
I reviewed this code seriously and found out
ui_layout sub object unset logic has been changed.
Obviously that breaks the elm compatibility.
When sub-object of layout is removed, it tries to remove sub-object from
the layout internal list. Problem is, some widgets sends internal signals
when sub-object is removed(i.e "icon,hidden") , but layout returns the
valid object even though sub-object unset is called prior to signal,
means, "icon,visible" not "icon,hidden" emitted.
This logic obvisouly changed from the previous efl version.
And we need to fix that logic first.
See _efl_ui_button_legacy_efl_ui_widget_widget_sub_object_del()
to check this issue.
1. button: sub_object_del()
2. layout: sub_object_del() => sub object must be removed.
3. button: signal emit() => for updating states
4. layout: content_get() => returns valid object?????! (Issue)
Summary:
When _icon_signal_emit is called, "icon" part always exist. so, it only make
"visible" signal.
this fixes that issue
Test Plan:
elm_object_content_unset(button);
elm_object_content_unset(radio);
elm_object_content_unset(check);
elm_object_content_unset(progressbar);
Reviewers: Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6241
The interface efl_part_get should not be directly called from C, but the efl_part
wrapper should. It rely on efl_noref to properly destroy the object. Binding can
control the lifecycle of the reference the way they want by either calling the
wrapper or efl_part_get directly. It also means that the ugly ___efl_auto_unref_set
doesn't need to be exposed outside of EFL anymore.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6098
Summary: remove the elm legacy name of efl ui theme
Test Plan: run elementary_test and test efl ui widget cases
Reviewers: Jaehyun_Cho, woohyun, cedric, raster, jpeg
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5934
This changes a lot of things all across the EFL. Previously,
methods tagged @const had both their external prototype and
internal impl generated with const on object, while property
getters only had const on the external API. This is now changed
and it all has const everywhere.
Ref T6859.
Summary: this widgets inherit from Layout. they can use same text_aliases of Layout.
Reviewers: Jaehyun_Cho, woohyun
Subscribers: herb, cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5859
Reviewed-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
when set/unset icon and text,
signal "elm,state,[part],visible/hidden" is emitted.
This is wrong because visible/hidden should be handled by
Efl.Gfx.visible, not Efl.Text nor Efl.Content.
This should be changed into elm,state,[part],set/unset"
All relating edc should be fixed.
Test Plan: run elementary_test->button, Efl.Ui.Button
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric, woohyun, Jaehyun_Cho
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5798
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
efl_part macros are using each widget's internally defined
default_part_get() functions to get default part name.
This might potentially cause errors when future widgets
inherits the widget but not overriding Efl.Text.text and
Efl.Content.content.
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric, woohyun, Jaehyun_Cho
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5797
Summary:
For now, how to check whether a widget is legacy or not
is to check flags in private data or static flag, which is set
during elm_legacy_add.
If Efl.Ui.Legacy interface is added, it can be easilly checked
by efl_isa(obj, EFL_UI_LEGACY_INTERFACE)
Reviewers: woohyun, jpeg, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: conr2d, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5748
This fixes some of the warnings generated by calling functions on NULL
objects. One of the main remaining points is to avoid unwanted warnings
on non-existing parts.
Ref T6326
Summary:
ELM_PART_OVERRIDE_PARTIAL replaces ELM_PART_OVERRIDE and
ELM_PART_OVERRIDE_ONLY_ALIASES.
The difference is ELM_PART_OVERRIDE_PARTIAL calls super
ELM_PART_IMPLEMENT when subclass of part is not needed.
Test Plan:
Run elementary_test, Part Background, background part is well set.
Run efl.ui.panes/efl.ui.flip, check content is well set.
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, woohyun
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5566
When a widget inherits layout in tries to set theme in group_add or in
constructor. When another widget inherits the previous widget, it sets
layout again with new klass name. This sets klass in the widget and
sets layout in super class, so that it can set layout only once.
Test Plan: Run efl_ui_widget related elementary test.
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric, woohyun, singh.amitesh
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5473
This thing is used by only 2 EO APIs that are marked as @beta. I wonder
if the @beta tag or the ptr() expression made it work for eolian,
because it simply wasn't defined in EO.
I'm renaming it just so that it's more consistent with the new names
used by atspi (and EO API in general).
This will be used to solve issues around style_set:
if the widget is legacy or pure eo we may need to select a different
style. So in the constructor we need to know whether we are legacy or
eo. Note that calling style_set in finalize only is too late as we would
lose information such as efl_text_set() called inside efl_add().
This is VERY tricky.
For legacy, just create an internal class that has both. It's easier
this way. For parts that are handled by Layout directly, we know from
Edje which type to return.
For EO objects we should know from the part name which kind of part we
are dealing with:
- text (overridden by the widget)
- content (overridden by the widget)
- special (new efl_part based functions)
- generic (handled by Layout)
Note: Efl.Ui.Slider was handling "span size" on ALL parts. That's bad...
This is now limited to "span" only.
This means that ALL part handles inherit from the base part class
Efl.Ui.Widget.Part. Layout is the only exception where Efl.Part is
specially overridden.
This is a first step towards generic part APIs, including background in
all widgets.
In Edje and Elementary, we have part objects, which are what is returned
by the interface efl_part(). Those objects can't be of an opaque type as
this doesn't work nicely with strongly typed languages such as C++ or
C#. In JS, Lua, C the types are weak and mostly runtime-based so it
doesn't matter much.
As a consequence, the documentation and the types need to look nice in
this EO API. Thus, we remove the abusive term "internal" and explicitly
call all those classes "part" something.
Eventually we want the types to be declared in the EO file so bindings
(C#, C++, ...) can generate the proper access methods, returning the
best possible types.
Note that right now a few of those part types are used in the legacy API
but don't actually need to be exposed externally.
This is kind of a mega commit that does all the renaming at once, but
it's really just a big sed operation. The power of good IDEs :)
Ref T5315
Ref T5306
It's not beta. It's about to die.
Also, move #define ELM_WIDGET_BETA to the common header file, as it is
consequently required by ALL widgets. :(
Ping @bu5hm4n :)
Ref T5363
Also prefix with widget.
I want to rename this as child rather than sub. It's inconsistent with
the other parent/child hierarchies. Anyway the various hierarchies are
confusing, so let's keep this name :)
Ref T5363
This factorizes the code and makes most widgets handle key down events
in the same way:
- check that the object is not disabled, event is not on hold
- figure out the key binding based on the class name
- mark event as on hold
The class name is usually MY_CLASS_NAME but in some cases it was
MY_CLASS_NAME_LEGACY which may be different from the EO class name (eg.
elm_win vs. Efl.Ui.Win). In that case the key bindings are broken.
This breaks key bindings for the following widgets:
- Win (focus)
- Image ("clicked")
- Video (move, play)
This fixes key bindings for the following widgets:
- Nstate
Some widgets remain broken:
- Photocam / Efl.Ui.Image.Zoomable
A patch will be applied to restore the key bindings for the above
breaks.
This is an internal function that should probably become an overridable
protected method, as it's required for proper event handling in widgets.
Next step: use eo_event_info in the widgets implementations. Then remove
legacy event struct.
Ref T5363
Some names have not been changed, hopefully making a distinction
between legacy APIs and internal code (elm_layout_blah) and valid EO
usages.
This means many internal functions are still elm_layout_ as their
sole purpose is to support the legacy API.
Ref T5315
elm_layout_sizing_eval() marks an object as requiring recalc.
Unfortunately, it's been massively abused by various widgets into
actually doing the calc, or the min calc. So we end up with one API
that has 3 different definitions depending on the widget type:
1. Mark as requiring recalc (correct, respects doc, elm_layout)
2. Calculate min size and other size hints
3. Actually do some geometry modification
I believe we need to clarify these 3 requirements into 3 very clear
and specific APIs in elementary. Right now we have similar functions
in evas for 1 (evas_object_smart_changed) and 3 (smart_calculate).
But their exact definition also isn't necessarily what we want for
elementary.
Another clear problem is that layout_eval does not do any calculation
(in theory), so the "eval" word is a bit of a stretch here.
Once we're sure about the exact API we want, we can add this back to
EO and make it work across our EO widgets. For now let's just keep
the legacy API, and its EO overrides, as is.
Ref T5315
The expected usage is efl_text_set(efl_part(layout, part), text);
Same for text_get.
Also, added an example how to make API easier with providing
efl_text_set/get for the widget itself, in efl_ui_button. Please see
this example.
Mike Blumenkrantz
Jaehyun Cho
Marcel Hollerbach
Hermet Park
YeongJong Lee
Cedric BAIL
Taehyub Kim
Xavi Artigas
Daniel Kolesa
Sungtaek Hong
Jean-Philippe Andre
Amitesh Singh
Lukasz Stanislawski
Marcel Hollerbach
Daniel Hirt