This is preparation work for a later commit. This brings a flag that
indicates what the reason for a switch to call is, either a jump a push
or a pop.
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D11357
Summary:
In spotlight classes, "Manager" and "Indicator" are used as prefix in
the class names.
e.g. Efl.Ui.Spotlight.Manager_Plain, Efl.Ui.Spotlight.Indicator_Icon
However, those classes are basically manager and indicator classes with
different features. Therefore, "Manager" and "Indicator" should be used
as postfix in the class names.
e.g. Efl.Ui.Spotlight.Plain_Manager, Efl.Ui.Spotlight.Icon_Indicator
However, for the easier usage of C APIs, c_prefix of those classes are
remained to be "efl_ui_spotlight_manager_xxx" and
"efl_ui_spotlight_indicator_xxx".
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n, zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D11142
before this commit, push would add before the current element, pop would
return to the next higher element.
after this commit, push would add after the current element, pop would
return to the previous element.
ref T7991
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10781
the spotlight now is setting the overall correct min and max size on
itself. Additionally, the page size is now clamped to the size of the
container.
Correct min size of the container is defined to the MAX min size of all
the content.
The correct max size of the container is defined to the MIN max size of
all the content.
ref T7991
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10766
before we inherited from layout, however the theme of the layout was
basically just the event part, and the holder part for the indicator.
The indicator part is going to be refactored into something else
anyways, since the indicator should be useable on other widgets as well.
Which means, only the event part is left, which is only used by the
scroller spotlight manager, (and now moved there).
With the move from this away we are saving round about 0.2KB of pure
edje accounting. Additionally, we are saving in perf 4% that is spend in
_efl_canvas_layout_efl_gfx_entity_size_set, which also makes this less
CPU intensive when resizing (Or even just starting is also enough).
ref T7991
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10765
the main widget before presented a layout to hold the indicator,
however, for the causual case, this is not really needed. The indicator
itself is anyways going to be a more general prupose widget soon, where
the layout here can be taken as an starting point.
Additionally, this fixes general displaying of the indicator, before the
box padding refactor, a padding would have changed the minsize of the
mix, this is not the case anymore, which forces us to calculate the
minsize of the indicator theme.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10764
for now the eventrect was a swallow part, created by the container, set
to the edje layout. However, the only real user for this is the scroll
spotlight manager.
Which means, we have mostly unneeded element resized by edje, which is
quite an overhead. With this commit, this is moved to the scroll
manager, which makes the usage with stack and plain less memory heavy.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10763
if something is just repositioned, but not resized, it would not have
been placed correctly. This fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10762
that mirrors the name of the widget.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10706
i do not know why its there, it caused a bug in the past (in regards of
clippers and visibility). Now we can get rid of it completly, the state
of it is always compatible to the one of the widget itself, soooo ...
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10702
this new API makes it possible to stop animations beeing executed in the
spotlight manager. (The logic in the spotlight managers itself are
already implemented).
The animation will also be frozen during construction time of the
spotlight.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10701
There exist several flags to indicate whether an object should be animated, with inconsistent names:
Efl.Canvas.Layout.animation: bool indicating if Edje animations should be played
Efl.Ui.Spotlight_Manager.animation_enabled: bool indicating if page transitions should be animated
Efl.Canvas.Animation_Player.animation: Efl.Canvas.Animation object
This commit unifies all of them: "animated" is now a flag, and "animation" is an object.
Note: Animation_Player is in the process of being replaced by an "animation" property in the
Efl.Canvas.Object, hence the need for non-clashing animation flags.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10645
Summary:
with this commit all implementations of Efl.Pack_Linear to permit NULL
as existing parameter, this is verified with a spec test unit.
fixes T8210
Reviewers: zmike, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: woohyun, Jaehyun_Cho, YOhoho, segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T8210
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10023
same as the previous commit, just for spotlight.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9861
after playing arround with the widget, we found out that it feels quite
weird to have a index, where most of the time you work with widgets.
We might want to add syntax suger in the future to make it easier to
just jump to the next element, or to the previous, but that still is to
be decided.
The event and the communication to the spotlight manager are still left
to be used with the index, reason for this is, that we might need to
fill there an invalid pointer, if a deletion is triggering an animation,
which seems quite weird. That needs further discussing.
Docx have been updated, the sitemarks about the shifting of the
active_index can be removed, as the element is not subject of change
during content adds/deletes.
ref T7991
Reviewed-by: Jaehyun Cho <jae_hyun.cho@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9813
Previously, pop() does not unpack content if there is one content.
Now, pop() unpacks content without transition if there is one content.
Since there is no transition, NULL future is returned.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9450
setting the parent here is usefull, as we can forgot about this object
then, and do not have to free the object by hand.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9305
view_manager is a property that takes ownership of the view_manager
object. We are setting the parent in the setter which means, we should
actaully have one ref to the parent, and one from the caller, so we need
to unref one.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9304
View is something that is expected in the context of MVVM, so using it somewhere else is
going to lead to some confusion. Spotlight does descrive the objective of all of this
widget in actually a more explicit way as they all give the spotlight to one sub widget
at a time.
I have also renamed the View_Manager to be just Manager as the View there wasn't useful.
Mike Blumenkrantz
Marcel Hollerbach
Jaehyun Cho
Xavi Artigas
Cedric BAIL