Summary:
Based on the discussion T7883, there is no reason to keep those
interfaces separately. So, now, efl_ui_scrollable will support
the events and methods together.
@ref T7883
Reviewers: eagleeye, bu5hm4n, zmike, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7883
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10072
right now they are just thin wrappers from what have been in
efl_ui_collection. This is just a first effort, the interfaces have to
be equipped with more and better API, more events, and tests.
ref T8057
Reviewed-by: SangHyeon Jade Lee <sh10233.lee@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9515
i dont know why, but something got badly mixed up, the selection APIs
for text and item ended up in the same interface, which seems ... weird
?
This commit splits that up into container_selectable and
text_selectable, there is no future plan on my list for text_selection.
The rest of this series is working towards removing
container_selectable, replacing it with a new interface. However, the
interface will stay until list_view is replaced.
The changes in the legacy code are removing the efl.ui.selection
interface from it, item emission is not depending on the inherited
interfaces, additionally, this interface does not provide any API, so
this should not be an issue.
ref T7766
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9498
Summary:
This clarifies a bit the whole Orientation vs. Direction confusion, at the
expense of longer names (Image_Orientation vs. Layout_Orientation).
Also, the interfaces are now adjectives (Orientable) and the enums have long
names (*_Orientation).
Pretty big patch, but no functional changes.
Relates to T7863
Test Plan:
Everything builds and passes tests.
Elementary_tests show same behavior, including the "inverted" widgets, which
are the only parts which received a bit of code changes.
Proof:
https://travis-ci.org/Enlightenment/efl/builds/536277282
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, cedric
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8946
Summary:
This will help disambiguate later on when we rename Efl.Ui.Direction
to Efl.Ui.Layout_Orientation.
Relates to T7919
Test Plan: Everything still builds and passes tests.
Reviewers: zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8934
Summary:
And the Efl.Orientation interface -> Efl.Gfx.Orientable
(with proper c_prefix so it is not too cumbersome to use from C).
Also, turned the theme_rotation_apply() parameter into an int to avoid confusion.
Fixes T7919
Depends on D8912
Test Plan: Everything continues to build and pass tests
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, cedric, Hermet, Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7919
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8926
Summary:
efl_ui_clickable is now a mixin. The mixin now brings two APIs the press
and unpress API can be used to tell the implementation the state of the
presses. Within the implementation the calls to press / unpress are then
converted to longpress / clicked events.
Reviewers: zmike, segfaultxavi, cedric
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8820
the pack interface is a general interface for how we pack things into a
container. the align and padding property has less to nothing to do with
this. Hence this commit splits the two properties into theire own
interface.
fix T7825
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8699
Summary:
this interface only contains a single event which is implemented only by the
canvas object
ref T7561
Reviewers: cedric, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7561
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7905
Summary:
these hints are not strictly size-related, so renaming them is more consistent
with their actual function
ref T7563
Depends on D7968
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, cedric, bu5hm4n
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7563
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7977
Summary:
Eolian adds a per-class BETA guard (like EFL_UI_WIN_BETA) to any method tagged
as @beta. This means that any app (and the EFL code) wanting to use BETA features
has to enable them class by class, which is cumbersome.
This commit replaces the individual guards with the global EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT
guard, so apps only need to define one symbol to access BETA features.
Any usage of the per-class guards has been removed from the EFL code and examples.
When building EFL the global guard is defined by configure, so all EFL methods
already have access to BETA API.
Efl_Core.h and Efl_Ui.h no longer define EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT. Apps wanting to
use BETA API have to define this symbol before including any EFL header
(It has been added to the examples requiring it).
Test Plan:
make && make check && make examples still work, but there's a lot less #defines
in the code
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, q66
Reviewed By: q66
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T6788
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7924
As we discussed in T7469 with V40,
efl_ui_model_connect
efl_ui_factory_model_connect
need to be renamed to
efl_ui_bind_property
efl_ui_bind_factory
for this work,
Efl.Ui.Model.Connect interface is changed as Efl.Ui.Bind,
and bind_property and bind_factory both method is supported by this interface.
bind_factory need Efl.Ui.Factory,
and Efl.Ui.Factory inheritted Efl.Ui.Bind,
so I little bit concerned about circular referencing, but so far, it works well.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7529
Summary:
color_class_code seems to only have been added to efl_gfx_color in order to
share the hex conversion code, but this is trivial to do when it's in another
class and makes the api more sensible
ref T7559
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n, cedric
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7559
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7898
many users of the markup property are not interactive text cases, so splitting
off the interactive methods resolves a number of unimplemented method issues
ref T5719
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7787
Summary:
Efl.Gfx.Image_Animation_Controller name refers to the control of an animatable image.
However, the method we use is closer to controlling the frame.
We can change the name to Efl.Gfx.Frame_Controller and enhance the functionality of the frame control.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: Hermet
Reviewed By: Hermet
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, woohyun, #reviewers, Jaehyun_Cho, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7769
display contains properties that are used to manipulate the display.
Range_step is a interactive property since it manipulates the way the
user interacts with this widget. This resolves a few unimplemented APIs.
ref T5719
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7715
This factory handle caching of one type of object and automatically empty the cache
when the application goes into pause.
Creating object is costly and time consuming, keeping a few on hands for when you next will need them help a lot.
This is what this factory caching infrastructure provide. It will create the object from the class defined on it,
set the parent and the model as needed for all items a Factory create. The View has to release the Item using the
release function of the Factory interface for all of this to work properly.
This is copying what Elm_Genlist was doing for you in the background and bring Efl interface to parity.
Reviewed-by: Felipe Magno de Almeida <felipe@expertisesolutions.com.br>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7443
Since Efl.Interpolator's subclasses are used as interpolator class,
Efl.Interpolator class is changed to be an interface.
This change allows Efl.Canvas.Animation to have Efl.Interpolator as its
property in efl_canvas_animation.eo.
Summary:
the reference from efl_reuse was forgotten & the parent relation was not
correctlty setted, which led to the fact that NOREF was never emitted.
This caused that thte object never really was destructed probebly, and
thus the del_interceptor_cb was not executed, and the object simply
leaked.
The test checks that those properties are correctly set, additionally a
error is printed in the efl code when a part has not the expected
reference properties. This also enforces errors when users are doing
wrong things with objects returned by efl_part.
Reviewers: ManMower, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6254
The interface efl_part_get should not be directly called from C, but the efl_part
wrapper should. It rely on efl_noref to properly destroy the object. Binding can
control the lifecycle of the reference the way they want by either calling the
wrapper or efl_part_get directly. It also means that the ugly ___efl_auto_unref_set
doesn't need to be exposed outside of EFL anymore.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6098
Summary:
most usage of simple list, items are very limited and loading performance is not serious.
to support those requirement, this efl.ui.list will create scrollable box with efl.pack.
user can create list by packing an pre-loaded item object, Efl.Ui.List.Item class.
Test Plan: tested in efl_ui_list_example_1.c in examples.
Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida
Subscribers: woohyun, Jaehyun_Cho
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5861
Summary:
Legacy menu toolbar and ctxpopup are not new efl interface widget,
but it have efl interfaces, efl_ui_item and efl_ui_menu.
if we plan to implement this two, it should be a class not a interface,
so I remove it on legacy widget.
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5939
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
No need to split: those two are used in all the same classes, since the
split between Orientation and Ui.Dir.
Note that the enum types remain in the main namespace.
Summary:
Efl.Player interface simply provides play functions,
but another interface which indicates Efl.Player will play is also
needed.
Test Plan: Run elementary_test->Efl.Animation tests
Reviewers: woohyun, conr2d, Jaehyun_Cho, jpeg, cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5662
Summary:
Change name of 'grid' to 'table' for matching on common ui naming
and avoiding confusion with 'gengrid' and 'grid view'.
grid will be introduced as grid image view after.
Test Plan:
checked make & make install
checked make check - there are errors but not related with these changes.
checked make examples - there are errors in cxx but not related with these changes.
checked make discheck - failed
test in elementary_test with Efl.Ui.Table and Table_static.
Reviewers: raster, cedric, jpeg, felipealmeida
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5668
Summary:
scrollable widgets had a interface_scrollable as a mixin so that the
widgets had a 'is-a' relation with interface_scrollabe. however, new
scroller concept don't have 'is-a' relationship, but 'has-a'
relationship. scrollable widgets should have a scroll manager inside
them, then scroll manager handles event from user and api
implementations. and also we cut the features such as paging because
there will be aka 'elm_pager'.
we are expecting that the new concept make us to maintain the scroller
easier. please excuse for many unorganized code and logics. : (
[contained commit]
scrollable: add efl_ui_scroller example
scrollable: refactoring for behavior in case of multiple scroller
scrollable: remove repetitive scrollbar code.
scrollable: combine calculating bounce distance code.
scroll_manager: mouse up function refactoring
scroll_manager: mouse move function refactoring
scroll_manager: warp animator wip
scroll_manager: fix denominator value when calculating flicking behavior.
Fix to disconnect bounce animator once animation is done
gather duplicated animator drop logics
gather duplicated conditions
Rearrange prototypes and append comment
Add manipulate functions for animators
scroll_manager: change member_add function.
scroll_manger: apply mirroring logic
scroll_manager: apply scrollbar
apply API to scroller widget
scroll_manager: apply scroll event callback
Change logics for all about scroll animating
efl_ui_pan: add efl_ui_pan
scrollable: change content_min_limit to match_content
scroll theme: apply overlapped scrollbar
+ many others!
Reviewers: akanad, woohyun, cedric, jpeg
Subscribers: jenkins, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5222
Note by @jpeg:
Unfortunately this patch comes in a massive single blob, after too many
rebase operations. It has now come to a point where I think the API is
nice and it works as I'd expect.
Now I only wonder how applicable this will be for Efl.Ui.List. As we can
see Photocam (legacy and unified API) could be transformed to use this
new API.
A few classes allow their objects to be duplicated, so they should all
use the same interface.
Also, rename VG's dup to copy_from as it's not conforming to the
definition of dup.
Summary:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/T5900
Creating base class(efl_ui_spin) to support various shape of spinner.
Added button interaction widget efl_ui_spin_button inherited from efl_ui_spin.
Test Plan: Add tests in elementary_test.
Reviewers: Jaehyun_Cho, woohyun, jpeg, singh.amitesh
Subscribers: jenkins, id213sin, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5424
When I first implemented the Efl.Container interface I made a mistake of
mixing "single slot" content API's with "multiple children" content
API's. This should fix that, by separating API's that are for a single
part and those that deal with a list of children.
Efl.Content: Single slot. This will be used a lot by efl_part()
objects, and for the default content of widgets (eg. the window
content).
Efl.Container: Multiple children. Used by lists, boxes, layouts
(edje/elm), etc...
I didn't see any class that implemented both interfaces (note: Layout
implements Container and Button implements Content, so technically
Button implements both through inheritance).
For now the eo_prefix is not changed in Efl.Container. I wonder if it
should be reset (to efl_container) or not. This would only affect the C
API.
Ref T5328