Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific
library DSOs.
EAPI was designed to be able to pass
```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with
GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used
when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported.
MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can
declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but
it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not
work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC.
For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires
correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as
export for everything, you need to declare it as import when
importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally.
With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example
working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global
variables as exported symbols).
Example 1:
dll1:
```
EAPI void foo(void);
EAPI void bar()
{
foo();
}
```
dll2:
```
EAPI void foo()
{
printf ("foo\n");
}
```
This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both
cases and for gcc defining as
```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```.
However, the following:
Example 2:
dll1:
```
EAPI extern int foo;
EAPI void foobar(void);
EAPI void bar()
{
foo = 5;
foobar();
}
```
dll2:
```
EAPI int foo = 0;
EAPI void foobar()
{
printf ("foo %d\n", foo);
}
```
This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why
EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC.
Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com>
Summary: it is useless to check for header files which necessarly exist
Test Plan: compilation
Reviewers: raster, cedric, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8535
This is a major work and unfortunately couldn't be split into smaller
pieces as old code was highly coupled.
Ecore_Con_Server is now a wrapper around Efl_Net_Dialer_Simple
(ecore_con_server_connect()) and Efl_Net_Server_Simple
(ecore_con_server_add()), doing all that the original version did with
some fixes so ecore_con_ssl_server_upgrade() and
ecore_con_ssl_client_upgrade() are more usable -- see the examples and
-t/--type=tcp+ssl.
I tried to be bug-compatible, with code annotations where things
doesn't make sense. This was based on ecore_con_suite tests and some
manual experimenting with the examples, these can be helpful if you
find regressions (report/assign to me).
This looks like an obvious case of missing break. If it wasn't a missing
break, there should have been at least a comment. Looking at the code it
looks like a break is needed. Also, I suspect this code path is never
really tested, and that's why we never hit it.
Tests are not failing either way.
CID1039379
this makes efl ignore certain env vars for thnigs and entirely removes
user modules (that no one ever used) etc. etc. to ensure that *IF* an
app is setuid, there isn't a priv escalation path that is easy.
Being annoyed by different types of eina critical macros - CRI, CRIT,
CRITICAL -, I concluded to unify them to one. Discussed on IRC and
finally, CRI was chosen to meet the consistency with other macros -
ERR, WRN, INF, DBG - in terms of the number of characters.
If there is any missing bits, please let me know.