Suggestion: real sized images brainstorming #9

New Issue

2021-04-08T10:26:30-07:00

Thanatermesis commented

2021-04-08 10:26:30 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

This is not really an issue but something to brainstorm for a possible idea

Something that I like in "viewnior" (the default image viewer we use) is that it opens my images in their real size by default (or at least with my settings), this means that if the image is small, the window showing it is small (in their real size), and if is big, well, maybe is limited to my max-resolution...

So when im working on something and I want to know the quality of an image, i simply open it fast in viewnior to see that (so if the image has a low quality it will show me a not-so-big window), or maybe a resized photo to know if was in their original size or if was resized a bit smaller, that is much more friendly than "looking to the image size numbers", wich also the correct feeling of "how many pixels it fits on my screen?"

Update:

Oh, i just tried it and i got how it works... if you open multiple images with it, the window-size is set to a fixed size (and the images are resized to it), thats the same behaviour of entice, but if you open a single image, the window opened is on the size of the image (and thus, showing it on real-size dimensions), that is quite friendly!

By othe side I see that if the image is bigger than the screen resolution (or more exactly a 80% of it), it shows it resized instead of real-size 🤔

This is not really an issue but something to brainstorm for a possible idea Something that I like in "viewnior" (the default image viewer we use) is that it opens my images in their real size by default (or at least with my settings), this means that if the image is small, the window showing it is small (in their real size), and if is big, well, maybe is limited to my max-resolution... So when im working on something and I want to know the quality of an image, i simply open it fast in viewnior to see that (so if the image has a low quality it will show me a not-so-big window), or maybe a resized photo to know if was in their original size or if was resized a bit smaller, that is much more friendly than "looking to the image size numbers", wich also the correct feeling of "how many pixels it fits on my screen?" #### Update: Oh, i just tried it and i got how it works... if you open multiple images with it, the window-size is set to a fixed size (and the images are resized to it), thats the same behaviour of entice, but if you open a single image, the window opened is on the size of the image (and thus, showing it on real-size dimensions), that is quite friendly! By othe side I see that if the image is bigger than the screen resolution (or more exactly a 80% of it), it shows it resized instead of real-size :thinking:

vtorri commented

2021-04-08 11:50:15 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

please update to the latest git, i've fixed some issues

in the settings (right click), there is an option to autofit the image. Uncheck it and entice, will display the image at its size

check the title bar for the real image size and zoom %

please update to the latest git, i've fixed some issues in the settings (right click), there is an option to autofit the image. Uncheck it and entice, will display the image at its size check the title bar for the real image size and zoom %

Thanatermesis commented

2021-04-08 12:06:05 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

it is possible to move the image with the mouse when it is bigger than the window?
the icons looks a bit small, did you commited the resize of them? (i think you said 32x32)

about the topic of the ticket, i was thinking that could be better to set entice to "display image in real size and make the window to be on this size" when it is run from commandline with a single image parameter 🤔

- it is possible to move the image with the mouse when it is bigger than the window? - the icons looks a bit small, did you commited the resize of them? (i think you said 32x32) about the topic of the ticket, i was thinking that could be better to set entice to "display image in real size and make the window to be on this size" when it is run from commandline with a single image parameter :thinking:

vtorri commented

2021-04-08 12:12:55 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

the icons are now 30x30

the image is in a elm scroller. When the image is not auto-fit, then there are scrollbars in the direction where the image is bigger than the window. so normally, whatever elm supports is possible.

i'll see about command line

the icons are now 30x30 the image is in a elm scroller. When the image is not auto-fit, then there are scrollbars in the direction where the image is bigger than the window. so normally, whatever elm supports is possible. i'll see about command line

vtorri commented

2021-04-18 14:02:50 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@Thanatermesis by default, the image is fitte to the window.

to unfit it, press 'f' key
if you want to disable 'best fit' at startup, open settings and uncheck the corresponding option

@Thanatermesis by default, the image is fitte to the window. - to unfit it, press 'f' key - if you want to disable 'best fit' at startup, open settings and uncheck the corresponding option

vtorri commented

2021-04-29 04:24:55 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@Thanatermesis about resizing the window to the size of the image, rage has a 'n' shortcut. Would it be sufficient for you if I do the same with entice ?

Thanatermesis commented

2021-04-29 10:49:05 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

yes 'n' sounds like to do the job :)

what i wonder if is entice should be set like "n" by default when is run to display a single image

yes 'n' sounds like to do the job :) what i wonder if is entice should be set like "n" by default when is run to display a single image

vtorri commented

2021-04-29 11:56:46 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

@Thanatermesis 'n' shortcut implemented

about the default behavior, idon't know. I'll think about it

@Thanatermesis 'n' shortcut implemented about the default behavior, idon't know. I'll think about it

vtorri commented

2021-04-29 11:57:54 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

or entice -real-size file.jpeg
-real-size would do the same than 'n' shortcut

would it be sufficient ?

or entice -real-size file.jpeg -real-size would do the same than 'n' shortcut would it be sufficient ?

Thanatermesis commented

2021-04-29 13:24:27 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

the argument is not needed if we have the 'n' key :)

but i just wonder what makes you think is not good to have by default (only when a single-image is passed to be opened), of course if there's a "max" limit to not have a window bigger than the screen size

the argument is not needed if we have the 'n' key :) but i just wonder what makes you think is not good to have by default (only when a single-image is passed to be opened), of course if there's a "max" limit to not have a window bigger than the screen size

vtorri commented

2021-04-30 00:07:55 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

i can add an option to the settings if you want. You set it once and for all

vtorri commented

2021-04-30 02:24:30 -07:00

(Migrated from github.com)

no, it will not work

@Thanatermesis actually, when I pass one file, i parse the directory. So i can notice there is only one file if the directory has 1 image in it. So, i am not sure that it is very interesting to resize the window. Strike 'n' should be enough

or, like best fit, i can add an option so that the window is always resized by default for all images

tell me what you prefer

no, it will not work @Thanatermesis actually, when I pass one file, i parse the directory. So i can notice there is only one file if the directory has 1 image in it. So, i am not sure that it is very interesting to resize the window. Strike 'n' should be enough or, like best fit, i can add an option so that the window is always resized by default for all images tell me what you prefer

Sign in to join this conversation.