I'm afraid but this breaks the mono bindings too close to a release.
This also fixes the missing docs errors by adding a lot of inconsistent
placeholder text ("No description supplied.", "TBD") which will make
finding them later on more complicated.
I was the one that asked for this feature but it is not critical at this
point, so I suggest we explore some refinements (like T8291) before landing
this patch in its current state.
This reverts commit 2946cb3c32.
The things that require docs include classes, variables, typedecls,
events and methods/properties. Implements, params, returns, parts
and struct/enum fields don't require them.
Empty/whitespace only string does not count as documentation.
Summary:
if there is a none beta class, then this class should not depend on beta
classes in parameters / event types / return types, parent inherits.
This adds this validation, so we can start to slowly to unbeta more and
more classes.
Reviewers: q66, zmike, cedric, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: q66
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7999
This reverts commit a57c7f7510.
I pretty much hate to just revert your revert, but you failed to read my
replies, and failed to understand what i was talking about.
And YES we talked at fosdem about the platform issue, and do you
remember my answer, that back in time this might be the case, today is
different freebsd suppoerts setenv, and for windows we have a setenv
implementation in evil. And yes, vtorri also created a issue how bad and
evil this commit is, however, i still fail to see the issue since setenv
unsetenv and clearenv usages are taken as needed. (T7693)
The ownership question is answered in
https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7516#137367.
Can we please get into a state of technical discussions, and not *oh
shit, i am going to revert this* this has been in review for a long
time, a lots of people have tested it, we discussed things on it, and
there was 3 weeks of no reply from you.
The issues that exist will be dealed with. Feel free to create tasks if
you want :)
Revert "ecore: get rid of commands in efl_task."
This reverts commit 616381e9cf.
Revert "ecore: here comes a command line object"
This reverts commit 48e5684b3c.
1. this is broken:
EOLIAN static const char*
_efl_core_command_line_command_get(const Eo *obj EINA_UNUSED, Efl_Core_Command_Line_Data *pd)
{
return eina_strdup(pd->string_command);
}
it returns a const char * BUT it duplicates it on return. no. a big
fat honking NO. return a char * or don't duplicate. pick.
2. _efl_core_command_line_command_array_set() is broken by design. it
accepts an array of strings, but the strings are owned by the caller
who creates the array (requiring they free them up themselves after
this call) but the array becomes owned by the callee. the code here frees the
incoming array but doesn't care about the string content of it. it's
leak heaven waiting to happen (or bugs when someone wants to access
the array they create to walk it to free the strings they put into it
after it is set).
i brought this up and it was dismissed. now exactly he issue i brought
up is there with mixed ownership and the added complexity as well as
transfer of some ownership but not others.
go back and think about this so it isn't broken by design.
the mixin for now can carry a command, which can be setted as an string.
The string is then parsed again, this is done in order to make sure that
everything that needs escaping really is escaped or parsed correctly.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7516
Xavi Artigas
Daniel Kolesa
Marcel Hollerbach
Carsten Haitzler