strange that nobody except hdante noticed this before, but it was
missing linkage with -lrt in libemotion (due generic being static) and
ecore_evas/extn.
SVN revision: 83007
Instead of -I$(top_srcdir)... -I$(top_builddir)... and then do it for
the .la, use the EFL_ macros to generate the contents to be used in
automake files.
There is a nasty bit that libtool will parse Makefile*.am and will not
get _DEPENDENCIES from _LIBADD and _LDADD if these are in
@REPLACEMENT@. To solve this we must explicitly set _DEPENDENCIES. The
contents of this is almost the same as _LIBADD or _LDADD with the
"_INTERNAL_" replacement name.
I hope the code will be result will be shorter and consistent as there
is less places to change when we add/remove dependencies.
Statistics are quite impressive (diffstat):
{{{
37 files changed, 663 insertions(+), 1599 deletions(-)
}}}
SVN revision: 82785
buffer is lightweight and dependency for many engines, merge it back
into core.
extn is a module on its own, and it's the only one linking to
ecore_ipc, no need to add that to ecore_evas.
minor cosmetic changes to configure to make output consistent.
SVN revision: 82648
seems that automake will parse LDFLAGS for -module and if it's not
present it will complain about name not starting with 'lib'.
seems my last try was without NOCONFIGURE=1 and autogen continued to
the old ./configure, that printed lots of messages and the error went
unnoticed
SVN revision: 81917
- remove EFL_LIBS and EFL_CFLAGS, use per-lib values that inherit
from EFL (general)
- add NAME_LDFLAGS and EFL_LDFLAGS for linker flags.
- LDADD (binaries) now use NAME_LDFLAGS instead of NAME_LIBS, as they
link to libname.la and that will pull in the libtool dependencies
SVN revision: 81915
tree simply is broken and doesnt compile. error here:
...
src/Makefile_Evas.am:1809: unterminated conditionals: HAVE_WINDOWS_TRUE
src/Makefile.am:24: src/Makefile_Evas.am' included from here
src/Makefile.am:128: unterminated conditionals: HAVE_WINDOWS_TRUE
src/Makefile.am: installing ./depcomp'
automake: ####################
automake: ## Internal Error ##
automake: ####################
automake: undefined condition TRUE' for RECURSIVE_TARGETS'
automake: RECURSIVE_TARGETS:
automake: {
automake: HAVE_WINDOWS => {
automake: type: +=
automake: where: /usr/share/automake-1.11/am/texinfos.am:
automake: comment:
automake: value: dvi-recursive html-recursive info-recursive
pdf-recursive ps-recursive \
automake: install-dvi-recursive \
automake: install-html-recursive \
automake: install-info-recursive \
automake: install-pdf-recursive \
automake: install-ps-recursive all-recursive check-recursive
installcheck-recursive
automake: owner: Automake
automake: }
automake: }
automake:
automake: Please contact <bug-automake@gnu.org>.
at /usr/share/automake-1.11/Automake/Channels.pm line 657
Automake::Channels::msg('automake', '', 'undefined condition
TRUE\' for RECURSIVE_TARGETS\'\x{a}RECURSIV...') called at
/usr/share/automake-1.11/Automake/ChannelDefs.pm line 208
Automake::ChannelDefs::prog_error('undefined condition TRUE\'
for RECURSIVE_TARGETS\'\x{a}RECURSIV...') called at
/usr/share/automake-1.11/Automake/Item.pm line 94
Automake::Item::rdef('Automake::Variable=HASH(0x38cbe20)',
'Automake::Condition=HASH(0x2832a48)') called at /usr/bin/automake
line 4102
Automake::handle_subdirs() called at /usr/bin/automake line 8305
Automake::generate_makefile('src/Makefile.am',
'src/Makefile.in') called at /usr/bin/automake line 8602
Automake::handle_makefile('src/Makefile.in') called at
/usr/bin/automake line 8616
Automake::handle_makefiles_serial() called at
/usr/bin/automake line 8769
autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 255
...
i looked at the HAVE_WINDOWS if's and it seems fine to me - i couldnt
find what was missing, so i had to resort to a revert instead of fix :(
sorry :(
SVN revision: 81267
Implementing support for loadables modules. It makes the engines been
loaded when they are needed. It not breakes the api, so each engine
still has its own api.
The implementation basically is:
* Functions that creates Ecore_Evas, for example
ecore_evas_software_x11_new, request to load its module and then get
the module's function to create the Ecore_Evas.
* The other functions such as \(.*\)_window_get from the Ecore_Evas
its interface and then call the appropriate method.
* As there is no unified interface to communicate with the engines
(not break api problem), all interfaces were declared in
ecore_evas_private.h
* Now the data necessary for each module is not declared in the
Ecore_Evas_Engine structure, instead of this, the struct has a void
pointer that is used by the modules.
* In this first moment engines as software_x11 and gl_x11 were put
together in the same module, but obviously exporting all the things
necessary.
SVN revision: 80280
After agreement in the mail list, core developers agree to remove this
engine that was not being supported for a long time.
Given that most operations Evas uses are not accelerated in DirectFB,
or at least hardware that exclusively supports DirectFB, it's better
for those people to just use Evas/Ecore software (buffer) rendering
and expose DirectFB's framebuffer as destination surface.
SVN revision: 80232