Attached to the mail is a patch for elm_panes.
I have a query that shall we hide the unset content in the widget itself or should application explicitly hide them after unsetting!
In case of edje_object_part_unswallow, application needs to do it explicitly and it is documented but in case of elm_object_part_content_unset, there is no documentation available.
Details of the patch:
Existing Issue before this change:
1. Panes deletes the older content while setting a new content even though both are same.
2. left and right content are being unswallowed in the content_left_set and _content_right_unset functions. So when the reparenting happens, say when the content is put inside a layout then only _sub_del gets called and
unswallowing does not happen as these functions do not get called.
e.g. @@ -253,8 +250,6 @@ _content_left_unset(Evas_Object *obj)
if (!wd->contents.left) return NULL;
Evas_Object *content = wd->contents.left;
elm_widget_sub_object_del(obj, content); //wd->contents.left already gets set to NULL in _sub_del
- edje_object_part_unswallow(wd->panes, content); // can be unswallowed in _sub_del as in case of reparenting like setting content in a layout, only _sub_del will get called, not this function
- wd->contents.left = NULL; //this instruction is redundent as it happens in _sub_del anyway
return content;
}
Change Description:
1. Unswallowing the contents now in _sub_del as this is a common function to be executed when subobject removal happens.
2. Comparing the current content with new before deleting.
Signed-Off-By: RAJEEV RANJAN<rajeev.r@samsumg.com>
Thanks.
Regards,
Rajeev
SVN revision: 69720
Previous part names are just the swallow part names
but in modified version, the part names chaned to simpler meaning names to use.
i.e for button
elm_object_content_part_set(button, "elm.swallow.icon", icon);
-> elm_object_content_part_set(button, "icon", icon);
SVN revision: 65295
If you try to create a new widget, you must be sure that the parent
is really an evas object.
With the previous implementation it was possible to call an _add
function for an elementary widget with any non-null pointer as parent
eventually causing crashes (like with the elm_box).
SVN revision: 55521
Revised the parent, icon, end and content setter and getters of
elementary objects.
Review to smart objects and widgets items will be the next steps.
SVN revision: 53425
Before, the focus_cycle try pass the focus to next, and try again if
need loop the objects. Now, the focus cycle return possible next
object and if is necessary loop or not to focus this returned object.
SVN revision: 53111
* Remove vim modelines:
find . -name '*.[chx]' -exec sed -i '/\/\*$/ {N;N;/ \* vim:ts/d}' \{\} \;
find . -name '*.[chx]' -exec sed -i '/\/[\*\/] *vim:/d' \{\} \;
* Remove leading blank lines:
find . -name '*.[cxh]' -exec sed -i '/./,$!d'
If you use vim, use this in your .vimrc:
set ts=8 sw=3 sts=8 expandtab cino=>5n-3f0^-2{2(0W1st0
SVN revision: 50816