Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
wrote:
> After discuss with seoz, i changed to not clean selections also i
> removed the new added internal func.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I made a small patch to fix remained selection bug.
>> In decorate all mode, some item selection is not cleared after unset
>> decorate all mode.
>> I added to fix it.
>> And make unselecting common routine to a internal function.
>>
>> Thanks.
SVN revision: 70354
Subject: [E-devel] [patch] elm_genlist - bugfix at item flipped
I made a small patch about item flipped.
It resolves two bugs
1. flip_set and unset is called quickly, sometimes genlist can't free
flipped data.
it fixed to remove checking flipped status in item unrealize
2. add item unhighlight at flip_job
SVN revision: 70306
Subject: [E-devel] [Patch][Genlist] fix the bug in _elm_genlist_item_del_notserious
I made a patch to fix the bug in _elm_genlist_item_del_notserious.
If relcount is not 0 or walking is not 0, return.
SVN revision: 70291
Subject: [E-devel] [Patch][elementary_test] test_list
I had added test code for the elementary. but I made a pause it
because of
some reasons and just started again.
Today I have attached a patch for the elm_list which does not have test
code for the API elm_list_item_prev();
Please review the attached patch and give any feedbacks. I'll be back
with
other patches. Thanks!
SVN revision: 70265
Change Description: [elm_datetime.c] Separator parsing logic is changed in Datetime widget.
Predefined set of characters (both global and field specific) are ignored as field separators.
Can some one, please review and check-in the code in SVN Elementary.
Thanks, Sumanth
Singed-Off-By: Sumanth Krishna Mannam<sumanth.m@samsung.com>
SVN revision: 70220
verification. Patch by Taehwan Kim <ohpowel@gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Bluezery <ohpowel@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Currently, elm_widget_sub_object_add() does not check if obj and sobj
> are same object.
> Actually it is a user problem if user add object itself as it's sub
object.
> But I think that this checking is needed and it is better to give
> error logs to users. Because it causes infinite loop and it is hart
> to debugging. :(
>
> Thanks.
SVN revision: 69995