efl/src/lib/elementary/elm_popup_internal_part.eo

class Elm.Popup.Internal.Part (Elm.Layout.Internal.Part)
{
   [[Elementary popup internal part class]]
   data: null;
   implements {
      Efl.Container.content { get; set; }
      Efl.Container.content_unset;
   }
}
Efl: Remove part name in Efl.Container (use Efl.Part) This touches Edje and also Elementary where part names are used. This commit blew up in size since now all content part APIs (get, set, unset) require to use Efl.Part instead. This is a big refactoring commit, but no logic should have been changed. Fingers crossed. 2016-05-24 04:40:18 -07:00			`class Elm.Popup.Internal.Part (Elm.Layout.Internal.Part)`
			`{`
docs: elm_popup: fill gaps in elm_popup eo file documentation 2016-11-21 08:58:40 -08:00			`[[Elementary popup internal part class]]`
Efl: Remove part name in Efl.Container (use Efl.Part) This touches Edje and also Elementary where part names are used. This commit blew up in size since now all content part APIs (get, set, unset) require to use Efl.Part instead. This is a big refactoring commit, but no logic should have been changed. Fingers crossed. 2016-05-24 04:40:18 -07:00			`data: null;`
			`implements {`
elm: use new property implement syntax everywhere 2016-12-27 10:15:41 -08:00			`Efl.Container.content { get; set; }`
Efl: Remove part name in Efl.Container (use Efl.Part) This touches Edje and also Elementary where part names are used. This commit blew up in size since now all content part APIs (get, set, unset) require to use Efl.Part instead. This is a big refactoring commit, but no logic should have been changed. Fingers crossed. 2016-05-24 04:40:18 -07:00			`Efl.Container.content_unset;`
			`}`
			`}`