From 94be8a88d3c28fd8b339b141f2f209a01e589564 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaehyun Cho <jae_hyun.cho@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 07:59:46 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] eet_dictionary: remove dead code

If index value is not -1, then eet_dictionary_string_add() returns.
Therefore, it does not need to check the index value after that.

Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7922
---
 src/lib/eet/eet_dictionary.c | 14 +++-----------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/lib/eet/eet_dictionary.c b/src/lib/eet/eet_dictionary.c
index 46e8cbf723..7a80463bd6 100644
--- a/src/lib/eet/eet_dictionary.c
+++ b/src/lib/eet/eet_dictionary.c
@@ -130,17 +130,9 @@ eet_dictionary_string_add(Eet_Dictionary *ed,
    current->str = str;
    current->len = len;
 
-   if (idx == -1)
-     {
-        current->next = ed->hash[hash];
-        ed->hash[hash] = ed->count;
-     }
-   else
-     {
-        current->next = idx;
-        if (pidx != -1) ed->all[pidx].next = ed->count;
-        else ed->hash[hash] = ed->count;
-     }
+   current->next = ed->hash[hash];
+   ed->hash[hash] = ed->count;
+
    cnt = ed->count++;
    eina_rwlock_release(&ed->rwlock);
    return cnt;