Summary:
This enables all the checks unconditionally, without ignoring
classes that don't have an Efl namespace. This required a lot
of beta marking to make it build. It most likely doesn't
mark types correctly, as that is not fully enabled yet.
Reviewers: zmike, cedric, segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8266
Initial results of our static analysis showed a bunch of unused
imports or imports used only for documentation references. In the
first case, remove entirely, in the second case, change to 'parse'
in order to keep references working.
The static analysis is not perfect and yields false negatives for
certain cases, so there will be a second batch later.
we really should have data inside the loop object, so begin moving it
one small thing at a time. this is the basics that will allow multiple
efl loops. make an eo efl object and class for fd handlers that is efl loop
bound make fd handlers really bound to their parent loop and not global as
well as have a nice class/obj. create an message queue per loop and
put legacy ecore events on top of it... and a lot more.
this is not 100% done, but it's a lot of the core and groundwork.
various ecore_timer_add(), ecore_diler_add() etc. need changes.
The following still need doing:
ecore_timer (internal usage for sure)
ecore_idler (internal usage for sure)
ecore_idle_enterer
ecore_idle_exiter
ecore_pollers? (is the new efl loop stuff ok?)
ecore_exe (fork/spawn from any thread and track exe from that thread?)
ecore_signal code
ecore_throttle (should we have a single global too? we have per loop)
ecore_app ? (should every loop be given its own argv/argc?)
Lots of internal ecore code uses/calls these legacy calls and we
should have efl loop replacements and/or use the ones we have
The following will bedifferently designed for loop to loop
control/messaging/ipc:
ecore_thread
ecore_pipe
Xavi Artigas
Daniel Kolesa
Marcel Hollerbach
Daniel Kolesa
Carsten Haitzler