Subject: [E-devel] [tentative patch] evas memleak when no callbacks
I'm seeing some memleaks while using Evas' buffer engine. After
investigation, it seems that evas_free does nothing and returns
immediately if the canvas has no callbacks, which is what happens with
the buffer engine.
The attached patch seems to do the trick.
However, as I don't know that much Evas' internals, I thought it'd be
better to ask whether it's correct or I'm mistaken before committing.
So please comment.
SVN revision: 52769
really - i prefer it and if we hit the 2gb limit of a signed int for
bytes added to a textblock... thats the day we will need evas 2 :)
SVN revision: 52576
There is no meaning in negative values for image loading, marking as
dirty or size, so image internals (cache, entry) were changed to
unsigned, reducing possible errors, particularly with overflow.
engines were converted to the new way, but any 3rd party modules will
still work as they should be using values >= 0 only anyway.
please review.
new cases introduced by "comparison between signed and unsigned" were
fixed in the modules that used cache_entry or Image_Entry dimensions.
SVN revision: 52428
As we're heading for a release we better remove as much errors as
possible and as the first step I'm removing warnings due unused
parameters, variables and functions. These tend to pollute real errors
spotted by -Wall and clang/llvm.
This does not fixes all, just the clear that could be set to
__UNUSED__, particularly to do (and I'd like some help from the
authors):
* src/lib/engines/common/evas_font_{draw,query}.c (tasn):
intl_props is just used while doing BIDI, but also used in other
#ifdef blocks :-/
* evas_map_* (raster):
huge amount of warnings, code is quite confusing and thus I'm not
touching it. I have no idea whenever the commented blocks or extra
parameters are intended to be used or no.
* src/modules/engines/fbevas_fb_main.c (raster?):
is fb_setvt() to be used? If not do you mind removing it?
* src/modules/engines/gl_{common,x11} (raster):
huge amount of warnings, code is quite nested and full of #ifdefs
that does not help to give a clear picture of what's going on.
* src/bin/evas_cserve_main.c (raster):
I could have ignored most of the errors, but is the code correct? I
mean, there is no unload of images being applied. If you confirm
none of those warnings are harmful I can flag them as unused.
* src/lib/engines/common_8 (dottedmag):
lots of unused functions that were acquired from common_16, they
are unused and if they will not, then they should be removed.
SVN revision: 52421
soft16 was written as a single engine, thus it was all static/global
and had no EAPI in its functions, but then it was moved into
"src/lib/common_16" and got that, but got no prefix! That could cause
clash with other libraries, so adding such prefix.
soft8 was a copy of 16, thus had the same problems.
the engines were all based on software_x11, thus they defined the same
methods to deal with Xlib, however if you link them all in the same
binary (--enable-MODULE=static), the symbol would be redefined. Rename
symbols according to their module.
SVN revision: 52420
Tom Hacohen
Christopher Michael
Carsten Haitzler
Cedric BAIL
Chidambar 'ilLogict' Zinnoury
Vincent Torri
Lucas De Marchi
Iván Briano
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri