So far this was protected behind ifdef EO_API_SUPPORT. It also
was not used internally. Dropping this before the release, since
we will soon have a (hopefully) better solution to handle various
color representations.
Problem:
- edje aspect ratio is defined by 1 enum and 2 double (min, max)
- window aspect ratio is defined by only 1 double
- evas object aspect ratio is defined by 1 enum and 2 ints (w, h)
Which one is the best interface? Are min/max a better option?
Also, not sure how to call the enum...
Summary: let me know whats your thought
Reviewers: Hermet, cedric
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3893
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
Added flip and orientation interface and used them in evas_image.
Removed efl_image_orientation_set API and used efl_orientation_set and efl_flip_set API.
In implementation part, converted enums back and forth in order to keep current implementation as it is.
Test Plan: src/examples/evas/evas-images5.c
Reviewers: singh.amitesh, raster, tasn, herdsman, woohyun, cedric, felipealmeida, jpeg
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3844
A small hack to the toolchain allows us to generate enums with eolian
for use by Eet and Emile (internal or otherwise non-eo libraries).
Thanks to how BUILT_SOURCES works, the eo.h files required by Emile
will be generated before they are used.
This adds a partial dependency on eo for eet and emile:
- package dependency
- include dependency
There is no library link dependency.