Summary: There is no reason to typedef Elm_Multibuttonentry multiple times, the header file can be included, there is no cyclic dependency.
Reviewers: CHAN, zmike, #committers
Reviewed By: zmike, #committers
Subscribers: cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6705
Summary:
The legacy header was still referencing the eo class removed in
939690a8a9.
Reviewers: cedric, Jaehyun_Cho, vitor.sousa
Reviewed By: vitor.sousa
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5970
Summary:
We've been missed type of class name.
Add legacy class name to maintain compatibility.
@fix
Reviewers: jpeg, woohyun, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5749
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
I did it wrong.
The "Elm_Multibuttonentry_Format_Cb" should be maintain for legacy.
efl_ui_XXX has to use efl_format interface.
@fix
Test Plan: elementary_test->multibuttonentry sample.
Reviewers: cedric, woohyun, Jaehyun
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5824
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary: @ref T5358
Reviewers: woohyun, jpeg, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: Jaehyun, bu5hm4n, cedric, jpeg
Maniphest Tasks: T5358
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5169
JP's note:
MBE currently has quite a few issues, probably related to focus
handling. This needs to be fixed.