This factorizes the code and makes most widgets handle key down events
in the same way:
- check that the object is not disabled, event is not on hold
- figure out the key binding based on the class name
- mark event as on hold
The class name is usually MY_CLASS_NAME but in some cases it was
MY_CLASS_NAME_LEGACY which may be different from the EO class name (eg.
elm_win vs. Efl.Ui.Win). In that case the key bindings are broken.
This breaks key bindings for the following widgets:
- Win (focus)
- Image ("clicked")
- Video (move, play)
This fixes key bindings for the following widgets:
- Nstate
Some widgets remain broken:
- Photocam / Efl.Ui.Image.Zoomable
A patch will be applied to restore the key bindings for the above
breaks.
This is an internal function that should probably become an overridable
protected method, as it's required for proper event handling in widgets.
Next step: use eo_event_info in the widgets implementations. Then remove
legacy event struct.
Ref T5363
Some names have not been changed, hopefully making a distinction
between legacy APIs and internal code (elm_layout_blah) and valid EO
usages.
This means many internal functions are still elm_layout_ as their
sole purpose is to support the legacy API.
Ref T5315
elm_layout_sizing_eval() marks an object as requiring recalc.
Unfortunately, it's been massively abused by various widgets into
actually doing the calc, or the min calc. So we end up with one API
that has 3 different definitions depending on the widget type:
1. Mark as requiring recalc (correct, respects doc, elm_layout)
2. Calculate min size and other size hints
3. Actually do some geometry modification
I believe we need to clarify these 3 requirements into 3 very clear
and specific APIs in elementary. Right now we have similar functions
in evas for 1 (evas_object_smart_changed) and 3 (smart_calculate).
But their exact definition also isn't necessarily what we want for
elementary.
Another clear problem is that layout_eval does not do any calculation
(in theory), so the "eval" word is a bit of a stretch here.
Once we're sure about the exact API we want, we can add this back to
EO and make it work across our EO widgets. For now let's just keep
the legacy API, and its EO overrides, as is.
Ref T5315
This merges them with the now standard interface:
Efl.Canvas.Layout_Signal
Some wrapping work was required for legacy API which
takes no user_data in del() but instead returns it. The
new EO function, while harder to use, is more correct
(you can't delete the invalid callback by accident, and
this follows EO events design).
Another crazy wrapping was done in entry/text in order
to add the callbacks to 2 objects instead of just one,
and still return the user data.
As for Naviframe and Popup, those two widgets override
signal_emit to forward the call to another object than
the resize object, but not callback_add/del. So they
are definitely broken.
Ref T5315
Summary:
When scrollable set TRUE,
scroller must be calculated its size except using item.
If content is removed, scroller doesn't calculate its size, so it has previous size.
So there is a empty space in this case.
@fix
Test Plan:
1. elementary_test -to popup
2. open "popup-center-title + list content + 2 button (with delete content)"
3. click "Delete" button
4. compare between scrollable set true and false
Reviewers: herb, singh.amitesh, jpeg, cedric, conr2d
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5010
Summary:
In visuals_set function,
check action_area is NULL, and signal emit action_area,visible/hidden
So, before call visuals_set, action_area should be deleted.
Test Plan: Actually, action area has not min size, so it couldn't be observed.
Reviewers: herb, singh.amitesh, jpeg, cedric, conr2d
Reviewed By: jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5007
This is a follow-up to a4b79fdbe1.
efl_part no longer supports NULL parts.
NULL text parts are now aliased in legacy code beforehand.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Andre <jp.andre@samsung.com>
This affects the legacy content_set/get/unset part APIs. This
should avoid some unwanted ERR messages in case an elm_object_
API is used on an elm widget that doesn't implement said API.
What this does is request the widget for the name of the default
part if NULL was passed in. Since some widgets are not elm_layout,
they have to override the API themselves, which is why I made it
an internal EO API (rather than a series of efl_isa()).
In theory, part should never be NULL when reaching the internal
implementation code in the widgets, at least for content.
In EO, efl_part(obj, NULL) should be invalid.
Ref T5629
This is, unlike what some of the documentation says, a public
API on elm_object. Let's place it along mirrored for consistency,
even if edje object will not implement it.
Ref T5363
Summary:
If popup scrollable change from FALSE to TRUE after content or text is added,
content_area is deleted, so it cause null pointer problem.
main_layout has content_area in its CONTENT_PART, but in scrollable_set API,
tbl set into main_layout's CONTENT_PART, so content_area is deleted.
On the contrary, if scrollable change to FALSE,
content object in content_area is deleted, because tbl set into content_area's CONTENT_PART.
So if some object set into other object,
unset previous object and set it into properly part after that.
A case using item_append should be fixed by other patch.
@fix
Test Plan: Change scrollable repeatedly after adding content or text to popup.
Reviewers: jpeg, singh.amitesh, conr2d, cedric, raster
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: herb
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4894
Signed-off-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
The expected usage is efl_text_set(efl_part(layout, part), text);
Same for text_get.
Also, added an example how to make API easier with providing
efl_text_set/get for the widget itself, in efl_ui_button. Please see
this example.
Summary:
object_mirroed_set as opposed to config_mirrored_set doesn't work with
popup. This patch broadcasts a change on 'mirrored' to internal notify,
main layout, scroller and action area layout to make API work.
@fix
Reviewers: singh.amitesh, jpeg, conr2d, cedric, raster
Reviewed By: conr2d
Subscribers: herb
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4900
Summary:
Other widgets remove previous object when setting new content, but popup does
nothing for the part whose name is "default".
content_unset can be used to keep previous content object, so content_set
(especially with NULL) should be able to delete previous content object
for uniformity of the entire widgets.
@fix
Reviewers: jpeg, singh.amitesh, cedric, raster, conr2d
Reviewed By: conr2d
Subscribers: minkyu, herb
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4885
Summary:
After hiding animation is finished, "dismissed" callback will be called.
It means popup's visible state is FALSE.
But if evas_object_show(popup) is called in it's custom dimssed callback function,
popup's visible state is TRUE, so evas_object_show is canceled.
So visible_set(FALSE) is must done before call dimissed callback.
@fix
Reviewers: Hermet, herb, jpeg, cedric, singh.amitesh, raster
Reviewed By: jpeg
Subscribers: woohyun
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4869
Summary:
If last added button is removed, any statements to set last_button_number in for loop doesn't be executed.
So last button number has previous value, not 0.
Because of that, action area is not removed, but that area has zero height, so it doesn't be shown.
@fix
Reviewers: herb, jpeg, cedric, singh.amitesh, raster
Reviewed By: jpeg
Subscribers: woohyun
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4870
Summary:
When popup hides and shows fast, sometimes popup is not shown
because of the difference visible value between popup and notify
(case: popup visible state: 1, popup_notify visible state: 0)
To sync this value I added the visible set code in elc_popup.c
@fix
Test Plan:
1. run elementary_text -to popup
2. shows the hide popup
3. hides popup using the hide button
4. repeat 2,3 step
5. popup will be shown well
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric, Hermet, raster
Subscribers: Blackmole, woohyun
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4710
Summary:
Elm.Widget.event_callback_add conflicts with Efl.Object.event_callback_add.
To solve this problem, "widget_" prefix is added to methods starting with
"event".
Reviewers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4521
Summary: ELM_POPUP_ACTION_BUTTON_MAX is already defined in the included header file, elm_widget_popup.h.
Reviewers: cedric, jpeg, minkyu, Hermet
Reviewed By: Hermet
Subscribers: seoz, jehun.lim
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4312
Efl.Object.event_callback_call no longer calls legacy smart callbacks;
calling only event callbacks registered with the given event description
pointer.
Create the method Efl.Object.event_callback_legacy_call to inherit the old
behavior from Efl.Object.event_callback_call, calling both Efl.Object events
and legacy smart callbacks.
Update all other files accordingly in order to still supply legacy
callbacks while they are necessary.
This reverts commit 8a988717e1.
It seems we can't actually inherit from class more than once and neither eo
nor eolian will complain about it. You will just get random weird behavior.
This patch should come back once we have made an interface of edje.
This reverts commit 57d77c9041.
We are in freeze right now and this is a new feature. Considering the access
API is still in beta I might have let this slip by but its does not even build
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:27:1: error: conflicting types for ‘elm_object_part_access_object_get’
START_TEST (elm_object_part_access_object_get)
^
In file included from ../../../src/lib/elementary/Elementary.h:240:0,
from ../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:6:
../../../src/lib/elementary/elm_object.h:521:54: note: previous declaration of ‘elm_object_part_access_object_get’ was here
EAPI Evas_Object *elm_object_part_access_object_get(const Evas_Object *obj, const char *part);
^
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c: In function ‘elm_object_part_access_object_get’:
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:39:47: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘elm_object_part_access_object_get’ makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
access = elm_object_part_access_object_get(popup, "access.title");
^
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:27:1: note: expected ‘int’ but argument is of type ‘Evas_Object * {aka struct _Eo_Opaque *}’
START_TEST (elm_object_part_access_object_get)
^
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:39:13: error: too many arguments to function ‘elm_object_part_access_object_get’
access = elm_object_part_access_object_get(popup, "access.title");
^
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:27:1: note: declared here
START_TEST (elm_object_part_access_object_get)
^
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:39:11: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
access = elm_object_part_access_object_get(popup, "access.title");
^
Makefile:43996: recipe for target 'tests/elementary/tests_elementary_elm_suite-elm_test_popup.o' failed
make[5]: *** [tests/elementary/tests_elementary_elm_suite-elm_test_popup.o] Error 1
If you still want this in make sure it actually can compile the tests you added.
Summary:
The code of making buttons buffer is away from related codes.
@fix
Reviewers: Hermet, Jaehyun_Cho, jpeg, raster, cedric
Subscribers: Blackmole
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4133
Signed-off-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
if trying to apply incorrect theme, widget apply default theme and return TRUE.
so there is no way to check it really apply correct theme.
To resolve this problem, _elm_theme_set return three type enum
* related history : 4ca3ef4514
* elm_object_style_set is public api, so I didn't change it.
* typedef name [ Theme_Apply ] is temporarily, please suggest better one.
@fix
Reviewers: singh.amitesh, herb, Hermet, cedric, jpeg, raster
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4073
Summary:
max_sc_w decide popup's "content" area size when popup scrollable is TRUE.
but in popup's edc, "elm/popup/content/XXXX" has min size when scrollable is TRUE. (and it is content area layout)
max_sc_w has fixed value, so I think deciding by edc is better than fixed code.
Test Plan:
1. elementary_test -to popup
2. check "Enable popup scroll"
3. click any list item.
4. observe popup and compare before this patch.
Reviewers: singh.amitesh, herb, Hermet, raster
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4113
This allows apps to set the objects min size with hint_min,
while letting the rest of EFL define the minimum size with
rstricted_min.
I don't like the property names much...
Summary:
When the widget is unset from any container, a parent of the widget
doesn't exist. So we should set its parent to the top object.
But if we just set sd->parent, the parent can not find the widget as a
child. So the container widgets set the parent-child relation when
sub object is unset.
This commit is related to 0822ad2195.
@fix
Test Plan:
Check this issue.
https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3855
The unset widget don't added any widget as child.
So when it set scale, the widget can not reload the thmeme.
Reviewers: raster, cedric, Hermet, reutskiy.v.v
Reviewed By: Hermet, reutskiy.v.v
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3957
Conflicts:
src/lib/elementary/elm_mapbuf.c
This touches Edje and also Elementary where part names are used.
This commit blew up in size since now all content part APIs
(get, set, unset) require to use Efl.Part instead.
This is a big refactoring commit, but no logic should
have been changed. Fingers crossed.
Jean-Philippe Andre
JinYong Park
Daniel Hirt
Shinwoo Kim
Taehyub Kim
Cedric BAIL
Jee-Yong Um
WooHyun Jung
Shuhrat Dehkanov
Tom Hacohen
Vitor Sousa
Stefan Schmidt
Ji-Youn Park
Jaehwan Kim