Summary:
On homogeneous mode, children are of the same weight and of the same min size
which is determined by maximum min size of children.
Depends on D7750
Reviewers: Jaehyun_Cho, zmike, jpeg
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7889
this resolves unimplemented API by just mirroring the calls to different
API calls.
ref T5719
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7749
Summary:
If widget use both hint_align(HINT_FILL) and hint_max together, there is no way
to set to hint_align. See, elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box' -
"Button with a quite long text." button. you can control button position
using "Box align" slider, but this is not proper implementation. When there are
two widget which have hint_align(HINT_FILL) and hint_max, those positions are
determined by box_align rather than hint_align. it means widget align cannot be
set individually.
To solve this problem, this patch add hint_fill property. in order to avoid
conflict with legacy API named evas_object_size_hint_fill_set(), it only works
for EO widgets(made by efl_add).
Also, EFL_GFX_SIZE_HINT_FILL is removed.
@feature
Test Plan:
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Hermet, Jaehyun_Cho, raster, barbieri
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T3912
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7409
This changes a lot of things all across the EFL. Previously,
methods tagged @const had both their external prototype and
internal impl generated with const on object, while property
getters only had const on the external API. This is now changed
and it all has const everywhere.
Ref T6859.
For this patch I decided to add a pseudo legacy wrapper as the function
is called in a very large number of places. Fixing all those calls to
use the size2d form is a lot of work and a greater risk of b0rking
something.
It's not beta. It's about to die.
Also, move #define ELM_WIDGET_BETA to the common header file, as it is
consequently required by ALL widgets. :(
Ping @bu5hm4n :)
Ref T5363
Also prefix with widget.
I want to rename this as child rather than sub. It's inconsistent with
the other parent/child hierarchies. Anyway the various hierarchies are
confusing, so let's keep this name :)
Ref T5363
This removes an argument that was false only for a single widget:
naviframe. Hopefully this logic is now simpler, even though it involves
a small hack within naviframe itself.
Ref T5363
Some names have not been changed, hopefully making a distinction
between legacy APIs and internal code (elm_layout_blah) and valid EO
usages.
This means many internal functions are still elm_layout_ as their
sole purpose is to support the legacy API.
Ref T5315
After talking with @eunue I realised that the way I'd first
implemented the box/grid "pack" API was simply too complicated.
I had tried to make it possible to change the layout function
at runtime, like good old evas box, but since there are no function
pointers in EO the final design was really convoluted.
If someone really needs to change the layout of a box at runtime,
just create your own subclass, or unpack all items and repack them
in a new box.
Note: there are still some issues with the layout params & flow
Efl.Object.event_callback_call no longer calls legacy smart callbacks;
calling only event callbacks registered with the given event description
pointer.
Create the method Efl.Object.event_callback_legacy_call to inherit the old
behavior from Efl.Object.event_callback_call, calling both Efl.Object events
and legacy smart callbacks.
Update all other files accordingly in order to still supply legacy
callbacks while they are necessary.
This allows apps to set the objects min size with hint_min,
while letting the rest of EFL define the minimum size with
rstricted_min.
I don't like the property names much...
Summary:
When the widget is unset from any container, a parent of the widget
doesn't exist. So we should set its parent to the top object.
But if we just set sd->parent, the parent can not find the widget as a
child. So the container widgets set the parent-child relation when
sub object is unset.
This commit is related to 0822ad2195.
@fix
Test Plan:
Check this issue.
https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3855
The unset widget don't added any widget as child.
So when it set scale, the widget can not reload the thmeme.
Reviewers: raster, cedric, Hermet, reutskiy.v.v
Reviewed By: Hermet, reutskiy.v.v
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3957
Conflicts:
src/lib/elementary/elm_mapbuf.c
This renames some APIs from Efl.Pack in order to try and
make them more sensible. Feedback welcome.
Also, most APIs now return bool, where false is quite unlikely
to happen.
This removes Efl.Pack_Named which had a terrible name,
removes Elm.Container which should have been renamed
Efl.Ui.Container anyway, and introduces an interface
Efl.Container instead.
The hierarchy tree is now changed as objects don't inherit
from Efl.Container (it's an interface, not a regular class)
but only implement it. Obviously it is very easy to
reintroduce an Efl.Ui.Container parent class if we need it,
but I guess it should have some actual logic. It's basically
part of what Elm.Widget already does.
Some function names have been modified to look better in C
with the efl_content prefix.
@feature
- Children are now contents
- Efl.Pack_Layout is now a separate class and
merges Pack_Engine.
- Removed dumb class Efl.Pack_Item
- Updated docs
- Added pack_ or grid_ prefixes to some methods
Untested yet. Will need to add the common 3 classes:
- standard
- homogenous
- homogenous max_size
And then implement a true custom layout function, that
respects weights in a certain manner (need to define it
clearly).
This reuses the Evas.Box code, since we are still using the
box internally. The flow layout function is far from perfect
(it works well only with items of same height).
This shows how to use specific layouts provided by EFL.
So, since we don't have function pointers, all the solutions
to reimplementing the layout function are quite convoluted:
1. use events
2. reimplement layout func
3. use an extra object
4. use a generic class (non instanciated)
Promises don't apply here (layout will run multiple times).
Problems:
1. Multiple event callbacks will be called, resulting in
potential performance impact, extra events, etc...
Also, there is no way to define standard implementations
that would be provided by the framework.
2. Reimplementation of a function requires extra EO work
(create an EO class, etc...), doesn't allow on-the-fly
change of the layout method.
3. Probably the best solution is to have an object implementing
the layout. But this means creating an extra object along
with the container.
4. To avoid the extra object, use a class, and reimplement
a @class function. This unfortunately requires extra
EO work.
Solution 4. has been selected, but it's not very nice...
This should be the only linear packing container.
This replaces: evas box and elm box.
Edje box needs to be kept around for compatibility,
but it stays an EDC object only (for apps).
Lots of things are still to be fleshed out in this
box implementation:
- Simplify smart object / elm widget code
- Maybe stop using evas object box altogether
- Implement other layout strategies
@feature
Yeongjong Lee
Marcel Hollerbach
Xavi Artigas
Daniel Kolesa
Jean-Philippe Andre
Lukasz Stanislawski
Marcel Hollerbach
Tom Hacohen
Vitor Sousa
Jaehwan Kim