The definition of where to load icons is now up to the user
(through the configuration of the icon_theme config value)
rather than being defined in code per-app or even per-component
Summary :
when mouse up happens, item must be focused, and after that,
select must be called.
current logic, focus is already called inside the select function
and again focus set is called in the end of mouse_up,
so if user new focused widget inside the select callback,
mouse_up forcely take the focus into the item again.
select callback should comes after the focus callback calls
to work properly.
@fix
Box, Table and Grid now belong to legacy land.
Their Evas counterparts are already not installed anymore,
and Efl.Ui.Box and Efl.Ui.Grid are here to replace those
widgets (note: code was initially copy & pasted).
This should fix installed EO files consistency.
- Children are now contents
- Efl.Pack_Layout is now a separate class and
merges Pack_Engine.
- Removed dumb class Efl.Pack_Item
- Updated docs
- Added pack_ or grid_ prefixes to some methods
Untested yet. Will need to add the common 3 classes:
- standard
- homogenous
- homogenous max_size
And then implement a true custom layout function, that
respects weights in a certain manner (need to define it
clearly).
This fixes the linear API usage with a table.
TODO:
- remove internal table (as it doesn't support layout funcs)
- implement multiple layout functions (regular, homogenous, ...)
This reuses the Evas.Box code, since we are still using the
box internally. The flow layout function is far from perfect
(it works well only with items of same height).
This shows how to use specific layouts provided by EFL.
So, since we don't have function pointers, all the solutions
to reimplementing the layout function are quite convoluted:
1. use events
2. reimplement layout func
3. use an extra object
4. use a generic class (non instanciated)
Promises don't apply here (layout will run multiple times).
Problems:
1. Multiple event callbacks will be called, resulting in
potential performance impact, extra events, etc...
Also, there is no way to define standard implementations
that would be provided by the framework.
2. Reimplementation of a function requires extra EO work
(create an EO class, etc...), doesn't allow on-the-fly
change of the layout method.
3. Probably the best solution is to have an object implementing
the layout. But this means creating an extra object along
with the container.
4. To avoid the extra object, use a class, and reimplement
a @class function. This unfortunately requires extra
EO work.
Solution 4. has been selected, but it's not very nice...
This is only a partial implementation, work in progress.
The grid object should be a replacement for evas and elementary's
table and grid. Only the layout of items inside the container
is different, otherwise the API should be the same.
For now, this widget is based on an evas table but the full
layout logic will need to be reimplemented, eventually.
@feature
This should be the only linear packing container.
This replaces: evas box and elm box.
Edje box needs to be kept around for compatibility,
but it stays an EDC object only (for apps).
Lots of things are still to be fleshed out in this
box implementation:
- Simplify smart object / elm widget code
- Maybe stop using evas object box altogether
- Implement other layout strategies
@feature
Andy Williams
Cedric Bail
SangHyeon Lee
Mike Blumenkrantz
Carsten Haitzler
Jean-Philippe Andre
Tom Hacohen