a while back we have moved event submission from custom lists to eo
events. We also merged together the freeze and thaw functions, however,
this brought up one bug. smart_callbacks and the likes (those that used
custom lists before) are not effected by the legacy freeze and thaw
functions. This means, we should declare these legacy wrapper objects
unfreezable in order to obtain this behaviour.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Reviewed-by: SangHyeon Jade Lee <sh10233.lee@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10016
This should reduce the need for custom implementation of efl_object_provider_bind.
It also enable the ability to register provider from user code on any Efl_Object.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9292
Some user code may want to track an object ownership in regard to whether it is
kept by just one owner or shared between many owners.
This is specially true for code provided by bindings to other programming
languages, where different kinds of resource management may take place.
The event `ownership,unique` is triggered whenever the object refcount goes
from two to one, as a signal that it has just one owner from now on.
The event `ownership,shared` is triggered whenever the object refcount goes
from one to two, as a signal that it has multiple owners from now on.
It will not trigger when further increasing the refcount to any value beyond
two.
We also add benchmarks for sharing (i.e. increasing the refcount) and them
unsharing objects, in order to evaluate the performance impact of this patch.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8678
Until this commit eo did class functions as part of the vtable, which
enabled those functions to be overwritten in classes inheriting another
class. However in task T7675 we decided that this is not really good for
bindings, as most OOP languages do not support this sort of feature.
After this commit eolian realizes class function completly outside of
the vtable, the c-symbol that is the class funciton is now just directly
redirecting to a implementation, without the involvement of the vtable.
This also means a change to the syntax created by eo:
Calling before:
class_function(CLASS_A);
Calling after:
class_function();
Implementation before:
class_function(const Eo *obj, void *pd) { ... }
Implementation after:
class_function(void) { ... }
This fixes T7675.
Co-authored-by: lauromauro <lauromoura@expertisesolutions.com.br>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Kolesa <daniel@octaforge.org>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7901
This reduce the amount of time efl_event_callback_call(EFL_EVENT_NOREF) is triggered by a factor of 10.
Reviewed-by: Derek Foreman <derekf@osg.samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7744
EFL_EVENT_SPECIAL_SKIP has been defined to 1 for a long time and there
wasn't a way to disable it at all. There is no reason to not use it at
all, so here we go. This was default, now it is without useless code.
Reviewed-by: Derek Foreman <derekf@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7743
efl_noref is unused, but will still trigger the full eo call for nothing.
This was the most expensive NOOP. EFL_EVENT_NOREF does the same thing and
we can even filter generating that call as we know when someone is listening.
So removing the function.
Reviewed-by: Derek Foreman <derekf@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7742
Note: Their isn't any ability to do something like a static array of
events at the moment. It might lead to large memory being used when it
wouldn't be necessary. If that was the case, we could fix it, but it
would require a lot of dynamic hash operation I think.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <marcel-hollerbach@t-online.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7482
If you are to trigger an event and just cancelled the one being processed, it would just
not propagate any event while it should. The code looks like more like it was forgotten line
or something.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <marcel-hollerbach@t-online.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7481
Summary:
In the case when you have multiple future in flight related to one object, you
couldn't use the previous version of efl_future_then. Now all function calls
take a void* pointer that allow multiple future to have their private data
request data accessible in all the callback.
This should not break released API as Eo.h is not released yet and so
was efl_future_Eina_FutureXXX_then.
Depends on D7332
Reviewers: felipealmeida, segfaultxavi, vitor.sousa, SanghyeonLee, bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7472
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7379
Summary:
This commit add null check on _efl_object_invalidate
In EO_OBJ_POINTER, if obj_id is null, obj can also be null.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: cedric, zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7068
Summary:
there is now invalidated & invalidating.
invalidated returns true when all children are invalidated, and the
object is / was requested to be invalidated.
invalidating return true when the object is called to be invalidated but
not all children are invalidated yet. However, the object is garanteed
to be invalidated in near future.
Reviewers: zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric
Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6722
recent changes added unlocks for these mutexes in some other places, so only
do the unlocks where necessary
fix T7020
Depends on D6356
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6357
Summary:
this brings down the first frame time from 2.0 sec. to something at 0.7
sec.
ref T6983
Reviewers: zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: YOhoho, cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T6983
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6244
Summary:
the object is invalidated AFTER the parent is lost, (thats what the doc
says). Returning invalidated as true when the parent is still present is
thus not correctly.
Depends on D6222
Reviewers: cedric, zmike, JackDanielZ
Subscribers: cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6223
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Making wref disapear before the last event require additional work to use
them during the FREE event. As I think we should introduce a wref that
disapear after the invalidate state, it makes sense to move that to a later
stage. Especially because their is no specific event related to them
being set to NULL.
Allowing override of efl_del allow for messing with object life cycle which can create
problem for binding where an object was expected to be invalidated, but isn't really.
These events have been removed from efl_object.eo. Bindings can
still use the EFL_EVENT_CALLBACK_ADD and EFL_EVENT_CALLBACK_DEL
events from C, but they won't be available to the bound language.
The rationale is that bound languages probably will have their
own way to handle callbacks and C function pointers will mean
very little to them. For example, the binding code could route
the native callback through a dispatcher so the received
function ptr would always be that of the dispatcher method.
Closes D6179.
This changes a lot of things all across the EFL. Previously,
methods tagged @const had both their external prototype and
internal impl generated with const on object, while property
getters only had const on the external API. This is now changed
and it all has const everywhere.
Ref T6859.
Summary:
This commit add null check on __efl_auto_unref_set.
In EO_OBJ_POINTER, if obj_id is null, obj can also be null.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: woohyun, kimcinoo, cedric
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5869
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>