efl_ui_clickable_util was only for efl_input_clickable interface,
but there can be more cases which want to connect object event
to specific action interfaces (such as scrolling) in the future.
For that extension, efl_ui_action_connector seems better.
ref: T7847
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9486
Summary:
historically there have been two methods of calculating sizes in elm:
* elm_layout_sizing_eval
* evas_object_smart_calculate (now efl_canvas_group_calculate)
the former was used to set size hints on widgets, while the latter was
used to perform internal size calcs for the widget. for things to
work correctly, these functions had to be triggered in just the right
order at just the right time. many hard-to-fix bugs related to widget
sizing over the years have been the result of this split
this patch removes elm_layout_sizing_eval implementations so that all
widgets perform both internal size calcs and size hint setting all
in the same function, ensuring that these are always in sync
the result is that in the vast majority of cases, far fewer recalcs
happen for widgets, and they are quicker to achieve their final size
Depends on D9438
Reviewers: bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: bu5hm4n
Subscribers: bu5hm4n, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_widgets
Maniphest Tasks: T8059
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9439
Summary:
elm_layout_sizing_eval is a legacy function which should not need to be called
on new widgets
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: bu5hm4n
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_widgets
Maniphest Tasks: T8059
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9434
Summary:
some button styles do not have this part
@fix
Depends on D8970
Reviewers: devilhorns
Reviewed By: devilhorns
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8971
Summary:
This commits prepares the tree in order to mess with the events in the
Efl.Ui.Clickable event. Events which have been emitted in a none legacy
widget, are now emitted either with evas, when the widget is legacy due
to inheritance. Or via the normal event and normal event functions.
In case the widget is a legacy only widget (not used at all in the new
api), then the events are for now emitted with
evas_object_smart_callback_call.
Cases where event handlers have been added to legacy widgets, smart
events are now used, and not the eo one anymore.
ref T7844
Depends on D8813
Reviewers: cedric, zmike, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7844
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8816
Summary:
the repeat event is only emitted by the implementations of
efl_ui_autorepeat. Additionally, the event should only be used by those
who implement this interface.
Depends on D8832
Reviewers: zmike, segfaultxavi, cedric
Reviewed By: zmike, segfaultxavi
Subscribers: jpeg, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8813
the property should not exist. if something is not supported then do not
inherit from this interface. If something wants to use the button
theme, then this can be easily used via API.
In legacy we already have the situation that things inherit from the
button class. To solve this, the enabled call is disabled on those
widgets, and disable every time it is called.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8805
since commit a1addad60e, To add myself as a sub object of parent object will be
done in Efl.Ui.Widget constructor.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8280
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8135
Summary:
now that the error codes have been change to be compatible with eina_error,
this can be removed and will work through eina_error naturally
fix T7718
Depends on D8067
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7718
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8068
Summary:
this swaps the values of "no error" and "error" in order to maintain
consistency with the rest of efl where the zero value means "no error"
Depends on D8060
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8063
Summary:
Efl.Ui.Theme class is required to support language bindings.
Efl.Ui.Theme works based on current elm_theme features.
This patch fixes T7357.
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, cedric, lauromoura, woohyun, zmike, SanghyeonLee
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi, SanghyeonLee
Subscribers: SanghyeonLee, herdsman, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7357
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7244
Summary:
What happened before is that we registered efl_ui_leyout_legacy for
"elm_layout", which is not that good, since checking a (lets say) elm_button, for the type "elm_layout" would result in false. The same is with elm_button.
fixes T7081
Reviewers: devilhorns, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7081
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6430
Summary:
A call to efl_data_Scope_get is actually quite dangerous,
efl_data_scope_get will return a pointer to a 0 sized segment in memory,
this is happening based on how the class data is organized. So in theory
you could use this pointer and accidently write to it. This resolves
this issue.
Reviewers: devilhorns, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6337
This reverts commit 1b245787fe.
This is a workaround patch, even occurs a regression bug that
breaks widget signal emission logic. (Happened in Enventor toolbar)
I reviewed this code seriously and found out
ui_layout sub object unset logic has been changed.
Obviously that breaks the elm compatibility.
When sub-object of layout is removed, it tries to remove sub-object from
the layout internal list. Problem is, some widgets sends internal signals
when sub-object is removed(i.e "icon,hidden") , but layout returns the
valid object even though sub-object unset is called prior to signal,
means, "icon,visible" not "icon,hidden" emitted.
This logic obvisouly changed from the previous efl version.
And we need to fix that logic first.
See _efl_ui_button_legacy_efl_ui_widget_widget_sub_object_del()
to check this issue.
1. button: sub_object_del()
2. layout: sub_object_del() => sub object must be removed.
3. button: signal emit() => for updating states
4. layout: content_get() => returns valid object?????! (Issue)
Summary:
When _icon_signal_emit is called, "icon" part always exist. so, it only make
"visible" signal.
this fixes that issue
Test Plan:
elm_object_content_unset(button);
elm_object_content_unset(radio);
elm_object_content_unset(check);
elm_object_content_unset(progressbar);
Reviewers: Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6241
The interface efl_part_get should not be directly called from C, but the efl_part
wrapper should. It rely on efl_noref to properly destroy the object. Binding can
control the lifecycle of the reference the way they want by either calling the
wrapper or efl_part_get directly. It also means that the ugly ___efl_auto_unref_set
doesn't need to be exposed outside of EFL anymore.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6098
Summary: remove the elm legacy name of efl ui theme
Test Plan: run elementary_test and test efl ui widget cases
Reviewers: Jaehyun_Cho, woohyun, cedric, raster, jpeg
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5934
This changes a lot of things all across the EFL. Previously,
methods tagged @const had both their external prototype and
internal impl generated with const on object, while property
getters only had const on the external API. This is now changed
and it all has const everywhere.
Ref T6859.
Summary: this widgets inherit from Layout. they can use same text_aliases of Layout.
Reviewers: Jaehyun_Cho, woohyun
Subscribers: herb, cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5859
Reviewed-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
when set/unset icon and text,
signal "elm,state,[part],visible/hidden" is emitted.
This is wrong because visible/hidden should be handled by
Efl.Gfx.visible, not Efl.Text nor Efl.Content.
This should be changed into elm,state,[part],set/unset"
All relating edc should be fixed.
Test Plan: run elementary_test->button, Efl.Ui.Button
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric, woohyun, Jaehyun_Cho
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5798
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
efl_part macros are using each widget's internally defined
default_part_get() functions to get default part name.
This might potentially cause errors when future widgets
inherits the widget but not overriding Efl.Text.text and
Efl.Content.content.
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric, woohyun, Jaehyun_Cho
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5797
Summary:
For now, how to check whether a widget is legacy or not
is to check flags in private data or static flag, which is set
during elm_legacy_add.
If Efl.Ui.Legacy interface is added, it can be easilly checked
by efl_isa(obj, EFL_UI_LEGACY_INTERFACE)
Reviewers: woohyun, jpeg, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: conr2d, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5748
This fixes some of the warnings generated by calling functions on NULL
objects. One of the main remaining points is to avoid unwanted warnings
on non-existing parts.
Ref T6326
Summary:
ELM_PART_OVERRIDE_PARTIAL replaces ELM_PART_OVERRIDE and
ELM_PART_OVERRIDE_ONLY_ALIASES.
The difference is ELM_PART_OVERRIDE_PARTIAL calls super
ELM_PART_IMPLEMENT when subclass of part is not needed.
Test Plan:
Run elementary_test, Part Background, background part is well set.
Run efl.ui.panes/efl.ui.flip, check content is well set.
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, woohyun
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5566
When a widget inherits layout in tries to set theme in group_add or in
constructor. When another widget inherits the previous widget, it sets
layout again with new klass name. This sets klass in the widget and
sets layout in super class, so that it can set layout only once.
Test Plan: Run efl_ui_widget related elementary test.
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric, woohyun, singh.amitesh
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5473
This thing is used by only 2 EO APIs that are marked as @beta. I wonder
if the @beta tag or the ptr() expression made it work for eolian,
because it simply wasn't defined in EO.
I'm renaming it just so that it's more consistent with the new names
used by atspi (and EO API in general).
This will be used to solve issues around style_set:
if the widget is legacy or pure eo we may need to select a different
style. So in the constructor we need to know whether we are legacy or
eo. Note that calling style_set in finalize only is too late as we would
lose information such as efl_text_set() called inside efl_add().
This is VERY tricky.
For legacy, just create an internal class that has both. It's easier
this way. For parts that are handled by Layout directly, we know from
Edje which type to return.
For EO objects we should know from the part name which kind of part we
are dealing with:
- text (overridden by the widget)
- content (overridden by the widget)
- special (new efl_part based functions)
- generic (handled by Layout)
Note: Efl.Ui.Slider was handling "span size" on ALL parts. That's bad...
This is now limited to "span" only.
This means that ALL part handles inherit from the base part class
Efl.Ui.Widget.Part. Layout is the only exception where Efl.Part is
specially overridden.
This is a first step towards generic part APIs, including background in
all widgets.
In Edje and Elementary, we have part objects, which are what is returned
by the interface efl_part(). Those objects can't be of an opaque type as
this doesn't work nicely with strongly typed languages such as C++ or
C#. In JS, Lua, C the types are weak and mostly runtime-based so it
doesn't matter much.
As a consequence, the documentation and the types need to look nice in
this EO API. Thus, we remove the abusive term "internal" and explicitly
call all those classes "part" something.
Eventually we want the types to be declared in the EO file so bindings
(C#, C++, ...) can generate the proper access methods, returning the
best possible types.
Note that right now a few of those part types are used in the legacy API
but don't actually need to be exposed externally.
This is kind of a mega commit that does all the renaming at once, but
it's really just a big sed operation. The power of good IDEs :)
Ref T5315
Ref T5306
It's not beta. It's about to die.
Also, move #define ELM_WIDGET_BETA to the common header file, as it is
consequently required by ALL widgets. :(
Ping @bu5hm4n :)
Ref T5363
Also prefix with widget.
I want to rename this as child rather than sub. It's inconsistent with
the other parent/child hierarchies. Anyway the various hierarchies are
confusing, so let's keep this name :)
Ref T5363
WooHyun Jung
Mike Blumenkrantz
Marcel Hollerbach
Yeongjong Lee
Jaehyun Cho
Hermet Park
Cedric BAIL
Taehyub Kim
Xavi Artigas
Daniel Kolesa
Sungtaek Hong
Jean-Philippe Andre
Amitesh Singh
Lukasz Stanislawski
Marcel Hollerbach