display contains properties that are used to manipulate the display.
Range_step is a interactive property since it manipulates the way the
user interacts with this widget. This resolves a few unimplemented APIs.
ref T5719
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7715
Summary:
Efl.Ui.Layout namespace is removed to keep consistency with other
widgets.
Consequently, "Efl.Ui.Layout.Object" is renamed to "Efl.Ui.Layout" and
"Efl.Ui.Layout." is renamed to "Efl.Ui.Layout_".
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n, cedric
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers, SanghyeonLee, woohyun
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7291
Summary:
All events must have a type now, otherwise bindings don't know how to handle
the event_info field.
Most of the missing event types were actually "void" (no event_info present).
Some struct definitions had to be moved to eo instead of h files, so they
are available to bindings. Some have not, and are marked with FIXME.
Some namespaces have been fixed (like Efl_Event_Cb -> Efl.Event_Cb).
In general, there are hundreds of changed files, but mostly to add a type which
was not present before, so there's no harm done.
Also, A lot of FIXMEs have been added which should be, like, fixed.
For example, some events can send different types of event_info, which is
very inconvenient (and error prone).
Test Plan: make with c# bindings works, make check and make examples work too.
Reviewers: cedric, q66, lauromoura
Subscribers: zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6169
Summary:
For now, how to check whether a widget is legacy or not
is to check flags in private data or static flag, which is set
during elm_legacy_add.
If Efl.Ui.Legacy interface is added, it can be easilly checked
by efl_isa(obj, EFL_UI_LEGACY_INTERFACE)
Reviewers: woohyun, jpeg, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: conr2d, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5748
Following @taxi2se's recommendation. This is indeed a focus method, and
Widget already inherits from Focus.Object.
Ping @bu5hm4n who probably wants to adapt this further.
Ref T5363
Summary:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/T5900
Creating base class(efl_ui_spin) to support various shape of spinner.
Added button interaction widget efl_ui_spin_button inherited from efl_ui_spin.
Test Plan: Add tests in elementary_test.
Reviewers: Jaehyun_Cho, woohyun, jpeg, singh.amitesh
Subscribers: jenkins, id213sin, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5424
This reverts commit 9836116cab.
This is based on discussion today i had.
There would be a separate minimal spinner class instead
which facilates ways to extend it.
This is also another protected and beta API. Meant to be overridden by
subclasses, but belongs to a still unstable API.
The difference between the internal legacy and the EO API is really bad.
Same as with activate (previous commit).
Ref T5363
Some names have not been changed, hopefully making a distinction
between legacy APIs and internal code (elm_layout_blah) and valid EO
usages.
This means many internal functions are still elm_layout_ as their
sole purpose is to support the legacy API.
Ref T5315
elm_layout_sizing_eval() marks an object as requiring recalc.
Unfortunately, it's been massively abused by various widgets into
actually doing the calc, or the min calc. So we end up with one API
that has 3 different definitions depending on the widget type:
1. Mark as requiring recalc (correct, respects doc, elm_layout)
2. Calculate min size and other size hints
3. Actually do some geometry modification
I believe we need to clarify these 3 requirements into 3 very clear
and specific APIs in elementary. Right now we have similar functions
in evas for 1 (evas_object_smart_changed) and 3 (smart_calculate).
But their exact definition also isn't necessarily what we want for
elementary.
Another clear problem is that layout_eval does not do any calculation
(in theory), so the "eval" word is a bit of a stretch here.
Once we're sure about the exact API we want, we can add this back to
EO and make it work across our EO widgets. For now let's just keep
the legacy API, and its EO overrides, as is.
Ref T5315
Summary: The User requires this signal to handle spinner widget easily on their app.
Test Plan: Spinner test on elementary_test.
Reviewers: cedric, jpeg, Hermet, woohyun, Jaehyun, myoungwoon, Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: myoungwoon, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: myoungwoon, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4886
Now you can't use the same syntax as you would for a method to
implement a property as whole, instead you need to specify the
getter and/or setter explicitly. This is to allow parent classes
to expand their properties without altering behavior of the child
classes.
Summary:
Elm.Widget.event_callback_add conflicts with Efl.Object.event_callback_add.
To solve this problem, "widget_" prefix is added to methods starting with
"event".
Reviewers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4521
Previously events used to use class name as a prefix and ignored eo_prefix
when specified. This is no longer the case. Events follow eo_prefix by default
now. In order to get around this for classes where this is undesirable, a new
field event_prefix was added which takes priority over eo_prefix. If neither
is specified, class name is used like previously.
@feature
Mike Blumenkrantz
Marcel Hollerbach
Jaehyun Cho
Xavi Artigas
Mike Blumenkrantz
Sungtaek Hong
Jean-Philippe Andre
Amitesh Singh
Woochan Lee
Lukasz Stanislawski
Marcel Hollerbach
Lukasz Stanislawski
Daniel Kolesa
Jee-Yong Um
Stefan Schmidt
Tom Hacohen
Yeshwanth Reddivari
Cedric BAIL