Summary:
ctxpopup item have elm_list item internally.
item_part_content_unset need to pass on content part to elm_list item.
Test Plan:
1. launch elementary_test - ctxpopup
2. click Ctxpopup with part text & content function
3. press "Icon Set" and press "Icon Unset"
Reviewers: jpeg, woohyun, herb, Blackmole
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5018
Summary:
There were only 2 APIs (item_append, item_prepend) for ctxpopup item add.
Added more item add APIs (item_insert_before and item_insert_after) for convenience.
Test Plan:
1. launch elementary_test - ctxpopup
2. click Ctxpopup with callback function sample
3. check whether there are 3 items on ctxpopup
Reviewers: woohyun, Jaehyun, jpeg, cedric
Reviewed By: jpeg
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5004
Summary:
ctxpopup item have elm_list item internally.
But when elm_ctxpopup item was deleted, elm_list item was not deleted.
elm_list item in elm_ctxpopup item should be deleted in del_pre
when elm_ctxpopup item is deleted by elm_wdg_item_del()
Test Plan:
1. launch elementary_test - ctxpopup
2. click Ctxpopup with label only
3. "Never Show" item should not shown in ctxpopup
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric, woohyun
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5044
Some names have not been changed, hopefully making a distinction
between legacy APIs and internal code (elm_layout_blah) and valid EO
usages.
This means many internal functions are still elm_layout_ as their
sole purpose is to support the legacy API.
Ref T5315
elm_layout_sizing_eval() marks an object as requiring recalc.
Unfortunately, it's been massively abused by various widgets into
actually doing the calc, or the min calc. So we end up with one API
that has 3 different definitions depending on the widget type:
1. Mark as requiring recalc (correct, respects doc, elm_layout)
2. Calculate min size and other size hints
3. Actually do some geometry modification
I believe we need to clarify these 3 requirements into 3 very clear
and specific APIs in elementary. Right now we have similar functions
in evas for 1 (evas_object_smart_changed) and 3 (smart_calculate).
But their exact definition also isn't necessarily what we want for
elementary.
Another clear problem is that layout_eval does not do any calculation
(in theory), so the "eval" word is a bit of a stretch here.
Once we're sure about the exact API we want, we can add this back to
EO and make it work across our EO widgets. For now let's just keep
the legacy API, and its EO overrides, as is.
Ref T5315
This affects the legacy content_set/get/unset part APIs. This
should avoid some unwanted ERR messages in case an elm_object_
API is used on an elm widget that doesn't implement said API.
What this does is request the widget for the name of the default
part if NULL was passed in. Since some widgets are not elm_layout,
they have to override the API themselves, which is why I made it
an internal EO API (rather than a series of efl_isa()).
In theory, part should never be NULL when reaching the internal
implementation code in the widgets, at least for content.
In EO, efl_part(obj, NULL) should be invalid.
Ref T5629
Summary:
Elm.Widget.event_callback_add conflicts with Efl.Object.event_callback_add.
To solve this problem, "widget_" prefix is added to methods starting with
"event".
Reviewers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4521
Summary:
efl_ui_menu interface provides common functions of menu, toolbar and ctxpopup.
efl_ui_item interface provides common functions of menu_item, toolbar_item and ctxpopup_item.
Also implemented some missing functions like selected_item set/get in ctxpopup.
efl_ui_item interface should be used for other widget items as well.
Test Plan: elementary_test
Reviewers: jpeg, felipealmeida, raster, SanghyeonLee, cedric, yashu21985
Subscribers: bu5hm4n
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3897
It has been discussed on the ML (thread: "[RFC] rename efl_self") and
IRC, and has been decided we should rename it to this in order to avoid
confusion with the already established meaning of self which is very
similar to what we were using it for, but didn't have complete overlap.
Kudos to Marcel Hollerbach for initiating the discussion and
fighting for it until he convinced a significant mass. :)
This commit breaks API, and depending on compiler potentially ABI.
@feature
Efl.Object.event_callback_call no longer calls legacy smart callbacks;
calling only event callbacks registered with the given event description
pointer.
Create the method Efl.Object.event_callback_legacy_call to inherit the old
behavior from Efl.Object.event_callback_call, calling both Efl.Object events
and legacy smart callbacks.
Update all other files accordingly in order to still supply legacy
callbacks while they are necessary.
Summary:
if trying to apply incorrect theme, widget apply default theme and return TRUE.
so there is no way to check it really apply correct theme.
To resolve this problem, _elm_theme_set return three type enum
* related history : 4ca3ef4514
* elm_object_style_set is public api, so I didn't change it.
* typedef name [ Theme_Apply ] is temporarily, please suggest better one.
@fix
Reviewers: singh.amitesh, herb, Hermet, cedric, jpeg, raster
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4073
This allows apps to set the objects min size with hint_min,
while letting the rest of EFL define the minimum size with
rstricted_min.
I don't like the property names much...
@fix
Summary: fixx auto_hide mode to work correctly
Test Plan:
1. launch elementary_test - ctxpopup
2. click normal ctxpopup and auto_hide ctxpopup sample
3. check the auto_hide function whether it is work well or not
Reviewers: Jaehyun_Cho, raster, jpeg, cedric, singh.amitesh, DaveMDS, Hermet
Reviewed By: DaveMDS
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3967
This reverts commit 546ff7bbba.
It seems that eo_del() is useful and removing it was creating bugs.
The issue is that the way we defined parents in eo, both the parent and
the programmer share a reference to the object. When we eo_unref() that
reference as the programmer, eo has no way to know it's this specific
reference we are freeing, and not a general one, so in some
circumstances, for example:
eo_ref(child);
eo_unref(child); // trying to delete here
eo_unref(container); // container is deleted here
eo_unref(child); // child already has 0 refs before this point.
We would have an issue with references and objects being freed too soon
and in general, issue with the references.
Having eo_del() solves that, because this one explicitly unparents if
there is a parent, meaning the reference ownership is explicitly taken
by the programmer.
eo_del() is essentially a convenience function around "check if has
parent, and if so unparent, otherwise, unref". Which should be used when
you want to delete an object although it has a parent, and is equivalent
to eo_unref() when it doesn't have one.
This touches Edje and also Elementary where part names are used.
This commit blew up in size since now all content part APIs
(get, set, unset) require to use Efl.Part instead.
This is a big refactoring commit, but no logic should
have been changed. Fingers crossed.
We used to have eo_del() as the mirrored action to eo_add(). No longer,
now you just always eo_unref() to delete an object. This change makes it
so the reference of the parent is shared with the reference the
programmer has. So eo_parent_set(obj, NULL) can free an object, and so
does eo_unref() (even if there is a parent).
This means Eo no longer complains if you have a parent during deletion.
This removes Efl.Pack_Named which had a terrible name,
removes Elm.Container which should have been renamed
Efl.Ui.Container anyway, and introduces an interface
Efl.Container instead.
The hierarchy tree is now changed as objects don't inherit
from Efl.Container (it's an interface, not a regular class)
but only implement it. Obviously it is very easy to
reintroduce an Efl.Ui.Container parent class if we need it,
but I guess it should have some actual logic. It's basically
part of what Elm.Widget already does.
Some function names have been modified to look better in C
with the efl_content prefix.
@feature
This removes the conflicts between the different parents and also
indicates that this is to be used internally by widgets and should
not be confused with the normal user visible parent.
It is an internal attribute that should not be used by people
not implementing widgets. Marking it as protected signifies it
as such.
Set and get functions are inconsistent one with the other. When set
function is used with a certain value, one expects the get function
to return this value.
JEONGHYUN YUN
Jean-Philippe Andre
Jee-Yong Um
Amitesh Singh
Tom Hacohen
Jee-Yong Um
Vitor Sousa
Jinyong Park
Ji-Youn Park
Hermet Park
Taehyub Kim
Daniel Zaoui
Cedric BAIL