Summary:
elm_entry_context_menu_disabled_set API is called to wrong entry.
It should be called to "en2" that added for testing the API.
@fix
Test Plan: 1. elementary -to entry7
Reviewers: woohyun, seoz, tasn
Reviewed By: seoz
CC: herdsman
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D852
Summary:
Calculating the coordinate of the object to retain the focus with in view port.
Earlier focus was moving out of view port.
Test Plan:
elementary_test-> "Focus 3". Enable the Focus Auto scroll bring in and use
keys to move focused item.
Reviewers: raster, seoz, singh.amitesh, nirajkr
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D822
Summary: Load a map theme with a style to support customized style
@fix
Reviewers: Hermet
Reviewed By: Hermet
CC: seoz
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D845
As widget and widget item can have different in_theme value (since
30cada369), we need to update in_theme value whenever the widget or
widget item get the focus.
Applied this logic to genlist, gengrid, toolbar first.
List focus is not working well at the moment.
This fixes small focus highlight on the left top corner of genlist
when the genlist scroller is clicked before the genlist is focused.
Special thanks to zmike for the report.
elm_config_focus_auto_scroll_bring_in_enabled_get/set()
->
elm_config_focus_autoscroll_mode_get/set()
The main reason is that bring_in_enabled_get/set() APIs are too restricted
and thus not flexible. I got more requirements for the focus autoscrolling
such as none, wholely visible not just bring_in and show. So it is correct
to add mode_set/get() APIs for the focus auto scrolling.
Thanks god, we've found this before the release :)
@feature
This reverts commit 377179bdaf84aa1a86621cdfa64ed43613ab9d45.
The main claim of https://phab.enlightenment.org/T1205 was fixed in
the previous commit 30cada369. This code will be modifed again in the
next commit due to the api change during development life cycle.
Note: do not blindly revert this commit if you have any problem with
widget item focus. This commit is not related to any fundamental cause
of the issues. If you have a problem, please contact me first.
seojuyung2@gmail.com or SeoZ on IRC.
Thanks.
This was introduced during 1.10 development phase but this changed the
default focus behavior and got a lot of complaints. (especially from
discomfitor)
So I would like to comment this out now and make it optional on 1.11
by keeping the default behavior.
Fixing this issue is not trivial and will bring another issues like crashing.
So it is better to fix this in a development phase by refactoring list.
To fix this issue, the following are needed:
1. it->walking concept should be adopted instead of using just sd->walking.
sd->walking was introduced in beb418d6
2. elm_widget_item_del() should be called instead of the combination of
_elm_list_item_free() + elm_widget_item_free()
This was introduced in f343011d
This fixes variable initialize problems related to focus. This can be
reproduced when you enable focus highlight/animation and reuse
elm_list by clearing it.
This problem occurred because list item del pre is never been called.
This bug will be addressed in a next commit.
Unified the local variable name to ret if the ret is a return value of
another content_unset calls.
- Evas_Object *int_ret --> Evas_Object *ret
- Evas_Object *int_content --> Evas_Object *ret
- Evas_Object *content --> Evas_Object *ret
Summary: Genlist/gengrid object geometry was used before this patch but using the pan object geometry is more correct. This can be reproduced when the size of "elm.swallow.content" part is smaller then the size of scroller object, focus animtaion on items is jerky.
Reviewers: raster, seoz, singh.amitesh
CC: nirajkr
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D818
Summary: Name of that function is not proper in my opinion. Please consider that revision.
Reviewers: raster, seoz, bluezery, stanluk, jaehwan, kimcinoo
Reviewed By: seoz
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D827
This reverts commit b8549f3e83a8592145a50085182583adead2c74e.
this build system is bad and whoever did the eo integration should not feel pleased with themselves.
this.is.BROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOKEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN.
SERIOUSLY.
you cannot go scrolling all over the place in every widget that has a scroller just because the widget gets focus. what user wants that? no user anywhere, under any circumstances, ever, in all of history.
if you dare to put this back in, I will continue to remove it for the rest of eternity until it never, ever scrolls in any unwanted case. the focused item doesn't have to always be in the viewport, and should never be moved into the viewport [[[[[[[ except to maintain an already-existing position inside the viewport ]]]]]]]
too much of my time wasted on this stupid "feature" which should have been MUCH more thoroughly tested and reviewed before it was merged.
T1205 STILL NOT FIXED
Mike Blumenkrantz
Youngbok Shin
Carsten Haitzler
Anand
Stefan Schmidt
Jean-Philippe Andre
Jaehyun Cho
Daniel Juyung Seo
Davide Andreoli
Cedric Bail
Anil Kumar Nahak
Ryuan Choi
ChunEon Park
Patryk Kaczmarek
Daniel Zaoui
zmike