focused_item is only used in item containers. This API is now moved into
a widget item container, which *can* have a focused item.
ref T7553
Reviewed-by: WooHyun Jung <woohyun0705@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8013
This implements the behaviour in case no item is yet focused, but the
genlist is focused.
ref T6805
Reviewed-by: YeongJong Lee <yj34.lee@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7452
this ensures that if there is no focused item, that at least the
container is focused. This leads to the fact that the elm_genlist
/elm_gengrid is refocused when a window is unfocused and focused again.
Reviewed-by: YeongJong Lee <yj34.lee@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7451
Summary:
Efl.Ui.Layout namespace is removed to keep consistency with other
widgets.
Consequently, "Efl.Ui.Layout.Object" is renamed to "Efl.Ui.Layout" and
"Efl.Ui.Layout." is renamed to "Efl.Ui.Layout_".
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n, cedric
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers, SanghyeonLee, woohyun
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7291
Summary:
the focus model before was more meant for simplicity and not for
performance, this now is more made for performance.
The performance boost is achived by not using composition anymore,
but rather register realized items by hand. This keeps the amount
of items bound to the size of the viewport.
Additionally item realization that is followed by unrealization
immediately is not resulting in focus calls.
This solves the performance issue from T6580 in regards of focus.
perf results after this:
http://www.enlightenment.org/ss/e-5b61b50657f3c3.82619729.png
Reviewers: ManMower, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6720
Summary:
All events must have a type now, otherwise bindings don't know how to handle
the event_info field.
Most of the missing event types were actually "void" (no event_info present).
Some struct definitions had to be moved to eo instead of h files, so they
are available to bindings. Some have not, and are marked with FIXME.
Some namespaces have been fixed (like Efl_Event_Cb -> Efl.Event_Cb).
In general, there are hundreds of changed files, but mostly to add a type which
was not present before, so there's no harm done.
Also, A lot of FIXMEs have been added which should be, like, fixed.
For example, some events can send different types of event_info, which is
very inconvenient (and error prone).
Test Plan: make with c# bindings works, make check and make examples work too.
Reviewers: cedric, q66, lauromoura
Subscribers: zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6169
This patch implements bug compatibility.
genlist internally uses both a tree structure with Eina_List and a flat
Eina_Inlist to track its items. ALL of the items are in the inlist while
subitems appear in their parent's list. As a consequence both lists must
be kept in sync pretty tightly. Obviously this is not done at all and
has led to countless bugs, as soon as tree or groups are used:
- Invalid order of items (visually)
- Invalid order of items with sorted_insert
- Glitches in the matrix
- Crashes with sorted_insert
- Odd/even styles not properly set
- Promote/demote functions broken by design
- Developers send to psychiatric hospitals
- Etc...
Legacy genlist (1.19 and before) used an inlist order that basically
didn't make sense, as it didn't follow the logical order of elements (as
they appear visually). Unfortunately this has "worked" (really, that's a
huge stretch to use this word here) for a long time this way. As a
consequence, some applications (*cough* empc *cough*) have relied on
this order to implement "next album" or "previous album" where the
album title is a group node.
By changing the order of items in the inlist, this has broken the
assumptions made above, and ends up in cases that return NULL, leading
to SEGV. Sure, the app should have checked NULL, but that's not really
the point here. The behavior has been changed.
This patch implements "fixes" for the following functions:
- elm_genlist_first_item_get(): Don't return a parent
- elm_genlist_last_item_get(): Return a parent
- elm_genlist_item_next_get(): return a parent upon reaching the last child
- elm_genlist_item_prev_get(): return a child when a parent is passed
Important notes:
- This does not cover 100% behavior compatibility here. The only way to
have it would be to simply revert the entire genlist code to its
original version and never touch it again, ever.
- An explicit API is required for an application to specify which API
level it targets, so that we can cherry-pick which bug compatibility
features we want to enable. We are already doing this for EDC,
unfortunately.
@fix
fix T5938
Signed-off-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
This change finally introduces deferred parsing of inherits to
Eolian, after a long time and many iterations. That means instead
of parsing inherits directly as part of the main file's parse pass,
they're pushed into a queue and parsed later. The validation engine
was modified to properly fill in the remaining info afterwards.
This may introduce breakages but I haven't noticed any. It also
properly unlocks cyclic dependency support in Eolian.
Additionally, this also introduces checks for duplicates in class
inherits (class Foo(Bar, Bar) is no longer possible) and it adds
stricter name checks, so you can no longer have a class Foo.Bar
and refer to it as Foo_Bar in implements. This was actually never
meant to be supported, but the check was previously broken.
@feature
Summary:
For now, how to check whether a widget is legacy or not
is to check flags in private data or static flag, which is set
during elm_legacy_add.
If Efl.Ui.Legacy interface is added, it can be easilly checked
by efl_isa(obj, EFL_UI_LEGACY_INTERFACE)
Reviewers: woohyun, jpeg, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: conr2d, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5748
Following @taxi2se's recommendation. This is indeed a focus method, and
Widget already inherits from Focus.Object.
Ping @bu5hm4n who probably wants to adapt this further.
Ref T5363
I was told that the scrollable interface is being redesigned for EO.
This API definitely does not belong to the base Widget class, as it's
quite specific to item-based scrollable widgets, such as lists and
grids. Since Elm.Interface_Scrollable is itself being revamped, it is a
good place to move that EO API for now.
Ref T5363
This is also another protected and beta API. Meant to be overridden by
subclasses, but belongs to a still unstable API.
The difference between the internal legacy and the EO API is really bad.
Same as with activate (previous commit).
Ref T5363
Also prefix with widget.
I want to rename this as child rather than sub. It's inconsistent with
the other parent/child hierarchies. Anyway the various hierarchies are
confusing, so let's keep this name :)
Ref T5363
Some names have not been changed, hopefully making a distinction
between legacy APIs and internal code (elm_layout_blah) and valid EO
usages.
This means many internal functions are still elm_layout_ as their
sole purpose is to support the legacy API.
Ref T5315
elm_layout_sizing_eval() marks an object as requiring recalc.
Unfortunately, it's been massively abused by various widgets into
actually doing the calc, or the min calc. So we end up with one API
that has 3 different definitions depending on the widget type:
1. Mark as requiring recalc (correct, respects doc, elm_layout)
2. Calculate min size and other size hints
3. Actually do some geometry modification
I believe we need to clarify these 3 requirements into 3 very clear
and specific APIs in elementary. Right now we have similar functions
in evas for 1 (evas_object_smart_changed) and 3 (smart_calculate).
But their exact definition also isn't necessarily what we want for
elementary.
Another clear problem is that layout_eval does not do any calculation
(in theory), so the "eval" word is a bit of a stretch here.
Once we're sure about the exact API we want, we can add this back to
EO and make it work across our EO widgets. For now let's just keep
the legacy API, and its EO overrides, as is.
Ref T5315
Since this was moved into the two genlist and gengrid files I get
redefinition warnings during the build and when generating the docs
eolian actually errors out on me and stops parsing.
This may be a bit more controversial...
But Evas_Coord really is just an int and all the internals
of EFL assume that the base coordinate type is a 32-bit int.
So this type is a bit redondant and can't easily be changed
to, say, a float or int64.
Ref T5312
Now you can't use the same syntax as you would for a method to
implement a property as whole, instead you need to specify the
getter and/or setter explicitly. This is to allow parent classes
to expand their properties without altering behavior of the child
classes.
Summary:
Elm.Widget.event_callback_add conflicts with Efl.Object.event_callback_add.
To solve this problem, "widget_" prefix is added to methods starting with
"event".
Reviewers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4521
This is an override of efl_gfx_size_set. Same as before, the
order of operations matter so it is possible that a corner
case will break. In particular, legacy code was:
- intercept
- smart resize (do stuff), super, super, super
- evas object resize
The new code is more like:
- intercept
- super, super, super, evas object resize
- do stuff
But unfortunately this broke elm_widget (read: all widgets) as
the internal resize was done before the object resize. So,
inside the resize event cb, the resize_obj size would not match
the smart object size. >_<
This is an override of efl_gfx_position_set.
As for the other patches, I hope I didn't break anything.
A problem likely to happen is that the super call was inserted
too early or too late in the call flow. For instance:
_myclass_position_set(obj, x, y) {
position_set(super(obj), x, y);
position_get(obj, &prevx, &prevy);
do_something_with_delta_xy();
}
The above code flow is obvisouly wrong, but may have crept in this
patch (such a bug sneaked in inside smart object, breaking
everything at first).
Marcel Hollerbach
Xavi Artigas
Jaehyun Cho
Davide Andreoli
Lauro Moura
Marcel Hollerbach
Jean-Philippe Andre
Mike Blumenkrantz
Daniel Kolesa
Sungtaek Hong
Amitesh Singh
Lukasz Stanislawski
Marcel Hollerbach
Lukasz Stanislawski
Stefan Schmidt
Jee-Yong Um
Carsten Haitzler
Tom Hacohen
