In Edje and Elementary, we have part objects, which are what is returned
by the interface efl_part(). Those objects can't be of an opaque type as
this doesn't work nicely with strongly typed languages such as C++ or
C#. In JS, Lua, C the types are weak and mostly runtime-based so it
doesn't matter much.
As a consequence, the documentation and the types need to look nice in
this EO API. Thus, we remove the abusive term "internal" and explicitly
call all those classes "part" something.
Eventually we want the types to be declared in the EO file so bindings
(C#, C++, ...) can generate the proper access methods, returning the
best possible types.
Note that right now a few of those part types are used in the legacy API
but don't actually need to be exposed externally.
This is kind of a mega commit that does all the renaming at once, but
it's really just a big sed operation. The power of good IDEs :)
Ref T5315
Ref T5306
We had here a little problem, state focus_state_eval function handled
the unregisteration and consideration of the focus flags and then only
called a helper function (which was a widget function), that then did
the registeration in logical or regular mode.
Elm scroller for example took that function overwrote it and did onyl
permit logical registrations. Then again a evaluation of the focus state
and flags took place, and the function considered elm_scroller should be
registered as regular object, but found it to be logical. This lead to
the problem that we permantently unregistered Elm.Scroller and
registered it again as logical just to unregister it again. This was on
the one side a performance downside. But also a bug since all items from
within the Elm_Scrollers sub manager are getting reparent onto the
parent, which means not the root of the scroller (the scroller itself)
is the logical entrypoint to the widget but rather this reparented
widget, which led to unexpected focus warps like described in T5923.
tldr: this fixes T5923
It's not beta. It's about to die.
Also, move #define ELM_WIDGET_BETA to the common header file, as it is
consequently required by ALL widgets. :(
Ping @bu5hm4n :)
Ref T5363
Also prefix with widget.
I want to rename this as child rather than sub. It's inconsistent with
the other parent/child hierarchies. Anyway the various hierarchies are
confusing, so let's keep this name :)
Ref T5363
This factorizes the code and makes most widgets handle key down events
in the same way:
- check that the object is not disabled, event is not on hold
- figure out the key binding based on the class name
- mark event as on hold
The class name is usually MY_CLASS_NAME but in some cases it was
MY_CLASS_NAME_LEGACY which may be different from the EO class name (eg.
elm_win vs. Efl.Ui.Win). In that case the key bindings are broken.
This breaks key bindings for the following widgets:
- Win (focus)
- Image ("clicked")
- Video (move, play)
This fixes key bindings for the following widgets:
- Nstate
Some widgets remain broken:
- Photocam / Efl.Ui.Image.Zoomable
A patch will be applied to restore the key bindings for the above
breaks.
This is an internal function that should probably become an overridable
protected method, as it's required for proper event handling in widgets.
Next step: use eo_event_info in the widgets implementations. Then remove
legacy event struct.
Ref T5363
Summary:
when scroller can have focus and scroller's child can't have focus,
there is a problem that scroller is always selected to next focus object.
In this case, it should not enter into _elm_scroller_elm_widget_focus_direction()
Reviewers: woohyun
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5085
it turns out to be very handy to have a interface for the moving and
border elements, that is unconnected to the way of how widgets are
registering themself.
This for example enables us to get a simple focus manager that just
redirects the call into a internal 2 dimensional data struct
Some names have not been changed, hopefully making a distinction
between legacy APIs and internal code (elm_layout_blah) and valid EO
usages.
This means many internal functions are still elm_layout_ as their
sole purpose is to support the legacy API.
Ref T5315
elm_layout_sizing_eval() marks an object as requiring recalc.
Unfortunately, it's been massively abused by various widgets into
actually doing the calc, or the min calc. So we end up with one API
that has 3 different definitions depending on the widget type:
1. Mark as requiring recalc (correct, respects doc, elm_layout)
2. Calculate min size and other size hints
3. Actually do some geometry modification
I believe we need to clarify these 3 requirements into 3 very clear
and specific APIs in elementary. Right now we have similar functions
in evas for 1 (evas_object_smart_changed) and 3 (smart_calculate).
But their exact definition also isn't necessarily what we want for
elementary.
Another clear problem is that layout_eval does not do any calculation
(in theory), so the "eval" word is a bit of a stretch here.
Once we're sure about the exact API we want, we can add this back to
EO and make it work across our EO widgets. For now let's just keep
the legacy API, and its EO overrides, as is.
Ref T5315
This:
efl_content_set(efl_part(scroller, "default"), obj)
worked fine, but, this:
efl_content_set(scroller, obj)
didn't work as expected.
Thanks @JackDanielz for the report.
Note: There is a problem still... "default" should not work
with efl_part. This is quite bad, actually. It should
probably be "content" instead.
with this we can whipe out the focus.manager field in elm.widget so for
the case that something goes wrong we only get the error message where
actually something went wrong, and not the whole bunch of follow ups
where the code assumes its registered but it isnt.
This affects the legacy content_set/get/unset part APIs. This
should avoid some unwanted ERR messages in case an elm_object_
API is used on an elm widget that doesn't implement said API.
What this does is request the widget for the name of the default
part if NULL was passed in. Since some widgets are not elm_layout,
they have to override the API themselves, which is why I made it
an internal EO API (rather than a series of efl_isa()).
In theory, part should never be NULL when reaching the internal
implementation code in the widgets, at least for content.
In EO, efl_part(obj, NULL) should be invalid.
Ref T5629
This is, unlike what some of the documentation says, a public
API on elm_object. Let's place it along mirrored for consistency,
even if edje object will not implement it.
Ref T5363
Summary:
Problem that scroller is not mirrored in RTL mode has been fixed in D4908.
However, I found a problem in init process.
I will revert D4908 commit(https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4908).
After edje_obj is initialized, mirrored_set is called.
When wanted_region_set is called, x-coordinate flip normally and acts as RTL.
Test Plan: scroller test on elementary_test.
Reviewers: raster, woohyun, SanghyeonLee, akanad, eagleeye, cedric, singh.amitesh, eunue
Subscribers: jpeg, cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4944
Summary:
This reverts commit de313d6296.
Because x-coordination mirroring is called properly from wanted_regison_set.
There was a problem in scroller init process.
Before edje_obj was initialize in elm_interface_scrollable_objects_set, mirrored_set was being called.
So Move mirrored_set after elm_interface_scrollable_objects_set
it can fix this issue(https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4944)
Reviewers: raster, woohyun, SanghyeonLee, akanad, eagleeye, cedric, singh.amitesh, eunue
Subscribers: jpeg, cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4945
Summary:
Fixes that a scroller can not be moved normally even if it is changed to mirrored.
In elm_scroller, _mirrored_set is called when sizing_eval is called. because
When content size is changed, it should be scrolled based on mirrored coordinates.
Also In elm_interface_scrollable,
elm_interface_scrollable_content_pos_set of _elm_scrollable_mirrored_set
to be called regardless of mirrored state.
Test Plan: scroller test on elementary_test.
Reviewers: raster, woohyun, SanghyeonLee, akanad, eagleeye, cedric, singh.amitesh, eunue
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4908
Signed-off-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
Once rtl mode is set, elm_layout reverses its x-axis.
however, scroller uses elm_layout to contain both original content and
proxy image of it when loop mode is set.
In this situation, elm_layout should not reverse its x-axis when It is
used for container of proxy to support loop mode of scroller.
This commit will not apply rtl mode to contents layout (mirrored set)
Test Plan:
* Check that there is a proxy image over right edge of original content.
1. Run elementary_test
2. Open scroller
3. Switch UI_mirrored mode on
4. Test (Control with keyboard / mouse wheel control looks bad on rtl mod)
a. go to the right edge with keyboard
b. get over the edge
Reviewers: woohyun, z-wony, jpeg, cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4568
Signed-off-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
Elm.Widget.event_callback_add conflicts with Efl.Object.event_callback_add.
To solve this problem, "widget_" prefix is added to methods starting with
"event".
Reviewers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4521
Summary:
when scroller page is enabled and key is pressed,
scroller will move in page by page.
Test Plan: elementary_test -> scroller
Reviewers: woohyun, cedric, jaehwan, raster, Hermet
Subscribers: akanad, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4425
This is an override of efl_gfx_size_set. Same as before, the
order of operations matter so it is possible that a corner
case will break. In particular, legacy code was:
- intercept
- smart resize (do stuff), super, super, super
- evas object resize
The new code is more like:
- intercept
- super, super, super, evas object resize
- do stuff
But unfortunately this broke elm_widget (read: all widgets) as
the internal resize was done before the object resize. So,
inside the resize event cb, the resize_obj size would not match
the smart object size. >_<
This is an override of efl_gfx_position_set.
As for the other patches, I hope I didn't break anything.
A problem likely to happen is that the super call was inserted
too early or too late in the call flow. For instance:
_myclass_position_set(obj, x, y) {
position_set(super(obj), x, y);
position_get(obj, &prevx, &prevy);
do_something_with_delta_xy();
}
The above code flow is obvisouly wrong, but may have crept in this
patch (such a bug sneaked in inside smart object, breaking
everything at first).
Efl.Object.event_callback_call no longer calls legacy smart callbacks;
calling only event callbacks registered with the given event description
pointer.
Create the method Efl.Object.event_callback_legacy_call to inherit the old
behavior from Efl.Object.event_callback_call, calling both Efl.Object events
and legacy smart callbacks.
Update all other files accordingly in order to still supply legacy
callbacks while they are necessary.
This removes some useless code in various places, where the
switch from eo_do() to standard function call was not properly
refactored.
This changes:
type ret = 0;
ret = my_eo_function();
return ret;
To:
return my_eo_function();
Summary:
if trying to apply incorrect theme, widget apply default theme and return TRUE.
so there is no way to check it really apply correct theme.
To resolve this problem, _elm_theme_set return three type enum
* related history : 4ca3ef4514
* elm_object_style_set is public api, so I didn't change it.
* typedef name [ Theme_Apply ] is temporarily, please suggest better one.
@fix
Reviewers: singh.amitesh, herb, Hermet, cedric, jpeg, raster
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4073
Summary:
There is a issue about passing the focus to unfocusable scroller.
To prevent the issue, check the status of focusable object and child object
before passing the focus.
Test Plan:
{F38439}
I changed the test file.
The problem occured as below.
1. click button
2. show popup
3. click cancel button in popup
4. lost the focus
Reviewers: Hermet, raster, cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: minkyu, sju27, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4056
Signed-off-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
This allows apps to set the objects min size with hint_min,
while letting the rest of EFL define the minimum size with
rstricted_min.
I don't like the property names much...
So, I was storing a single "sd" pointer (class private data)
but using it in two different places, ie. as if it were two
different classes. Crashes happened, complaints were heard.
See T3714.
Summary:
When the widget is unset from any container, a parent of the widget
doesn't exist. So we should set its parent to the top object.
But if we just set sd->parent, the parent can not find the widget as a
child. So the container widgets set the parent-child relation when
sub object is unset.
This commit is related to 0822ad2195.
@fix
Test Plan:
Check this issue.
https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3855
The unset widget don't added any widget as child.
So when it set scale, the widget can not reload the thmeme.
Reviewers: raster, cedric, Hermet, reutskiy.v.v
Reviewed By: Hermet, reutskiy.v.v
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3957
Conflicts:
src/lib/elementary/elm_mapbuf.c
This touches Edje and also Elementary where part names are used.
This commit blew up in size since now all content part APIs
(get, set, unset) require to use Efl.Part instead.
This is a big refactoring commit, but no logic should
have been changed. Fingers crossed.
This removes Efl.Pack_Named which had a terrible name,
removes Elm.Container which should have been renamed
Efl.Ui.Container anyway, and introduces an interface
Efl.Container instead.
The hierarchy tree is now changed as objects don't inherit
from Efl.Container (it's an interface, not a regular class)
but only implement it. Obviously it is very easy to
reintroduce an Efl.Ui.Container parent class if we need it,
but I guess it should have some actual logic. It's basically
part of what Elm.Widget already does.
Some function names have been modified to look better in C
with the efl_content prefix.
@feature
Jean-Philippe Andre
Marcel Hollerbach
Jeonghyun Yun
Jeeyong Um
junsu choi
Jiwon Kim
Wonki Kim
Cedric BAIL
Jee-Yong Um
WooHyun Jung
Hosang Kim
Vitor Sousa
Tom Hacohen
Jinyong Park
soohye
Jaehwan Kim