Summary:
Since we're now going to be shipping some eo classes as stable,
there is no point in keeping the eo api behind a macro, and it
should be enabled by default. Another case is beta classes, but
those are behind the EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT guard.
This also changes includes around the place where things are
clearly broken (such as an included header needing something
from another header but that other header being guarded, notably
efl_ui_widget.h needing focus manager but focus manager being
behind beta in Elementary.h)
Reviewers: zmike, cedric, bu5hm4n, stefan_schmidt, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: cedric, segfaultxavi
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8322
it looks like people have been relying on Elementary.h to include
eo apis even though this obviously makes no sense
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8223
As we discussed in T7469 with V40,
efl_ui_model_connect
efl_ui_factory_model_connect
need to be renamed to
efl_ui_bind_property
efl_ui_bind_factory
for this work,
Efl.Ui.Model.Connect interface is changed as Efl.Ui.Bind,
and bind_property and bind_factory both method is supported by this interface.
bind_factory need Efl.Ui.Factory,
and Efl.Ui.Factory inheritted Efl.Ui.Bind,
so I little bit concerned about circular referencing, but so far, it works well.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7529
Summary:
As the result of discussion in T7458,
we need to rename all efl_model based classes with efl_XXX_Model sequence.
I've run few vote for this, see V42, V43
few classes are totally renamed as our consideration of misnaming.
| Efl.Model_Loop | Efl.Loop_Model |
| Efl.Model_Item | Efl.Generic_Model |
| Efl.Model_Container | Efl.Container_Model |
| Efl.Model_Container_Item | Efl.Container_Model_Item |
| Efl.Model_Composite | Efl.Composite_Model |
| Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean | Efl.Boolean_Model |
| Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean_Chlidren | Efl.Boolean_Model_Item |
| Efl.Model_Composite_Selection | Efl.Select_Model |
| Efl.Model_Composite_Selection_Chlidren | Efl.Select_Model_Item |
| Efl.Model_View | Efl.View_Model |
| Eio.Model | Efl.Io.Model |
| Efl.Ui.Model_State | Efl.Ui.State_Model |
| Efl.Ui.Model_Size | Efl.Ui.Size_Model |
| Efl.Ui.Model_Exact | Efl.Ui.Exact_Model |
| Efl.Ui.Model_Average | Efl.Ui.Average_Model |
| Efl.Ui.Model_Homogeneous | Efl.Ui.Homogeneous_Model |
I worried about Efl.Io.Model changes, cause it is widely used,
but as I tested, there is no issue found yet.
Eldbus.Model also may can changed Efl.Dbus.Model,
but I cannot found any class who using Efl.Dbus namespace,
so I left it future work.
Test Plan:
Run the Make Test,
it works well except Efl test about selection.
there are class inheritance problem exist in select_model,
I reported it and will fix it in another patch.
Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida, woohyun, Hermet
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: lauromoura
Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7533
Fix bugs on Views and Model related with null items and proper ownership and
life-cycle of components.
Configure default theme for default factory on finalize.
Add new feature to specify signal connection to boolean properties of Models.
This also fix some '%v' substitution problems.
Parsing EINA_VALUE_TYPE_BOOL as boolean in Efl.Ui.Layout signal updates from
Models (instead of EINA_VALUE_TYPE_UCHAR). UCHAR no longer has special handling
and falls to the general result of eina_value_to_string() as other types do.
Use EINA_VALUE_TYPE_BOOL instead of EINA_VALUE_TYPE_UCHAR to signal selection on
click events to the Model.
Update examples to make usage of the new property connection feature in order to
model selection of items on Views.
Summary:
Efl.Ui.Layout namespace is removed to keep consistency with other
widgets.
Consequently, "Efl.Ui.Layout.Object" is renamed to "Efl.Ui.Layout" and
"Efl.Ui.Layout." is renamed to "Efl.Ui.Layout_".
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n, cedric
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers, SanghyeonLee, woohyun
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7291
Summary:
View is not a namespace, but an interface,
So, View_List cannot be under the view namespace for now.
it looks more suite to be end as View than List on this widget name.
Firstly, it follows our common naming rules of class.
Also, List_View is commonly presentable name on most UI frameworks,
so it is very easy to understand what this widget can do for the user.
Test Plan:
Make works.
Example is not works for now til stable model interface.
Reviewers: felipealmeida, woohyun, cedric, Hermet
Reviewed By: Hermet
Subscribers: larryolj, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7234
Daniel Kolesa
Mike Blumenkrantz
SangHyeon Jade Lee
Larry Lira
Vitor Sousa
Jaehyun Cho