This is a bit of a giant commit. However, the problem here is that
cleaning up the API went hand in hand with rewriting most of the usages.
In the process of renewing and removing old API the following was done:
- Legacy API testcases have been ported back to smart callbacks
- EO-API testcases have been ported to efl_add syntax
- weird event #defines have been removed
- Wrong constructor usage has been removed
- Ported to the new box object introduced before
- removed legacy API from efl_ui_radio
-> no more ptr(int) q66 will do jumps of happiness
-> no more ununderstandable group_add methods
-> Seperated code in blocks only for legacy, and blocks only for
non-legacy
To verify this commit, you can check all the tests that have been
touched here. Additionally, the cxx example has been adjusted
ref T7867
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9060
Summary:
This clarifies a bit the whole Orientation vs. Direction confusion, at the
expense of longer names (Image_Orientation vs. Layout_Orientation).
Also, the interfaces are now adjectives (Orientable) and the enums have long
names (*_Orientation).
Pretty big patch, but no functional changes.
Relates to T7863
Test Plan:
Everything builds and passes tests.
Elementary_tests show same behavior, including the "inverted" widgets, which
are the only parts which received a bit of code changes.
Proof:
https://travis-ci.org/Enlightenment/efl/builds/536277282
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, cedric
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8946
Summary:
The only implementation of this interface, `Efl.Ui.Table`, only supports two fill
directions (horizontal or vertical), therefore the table_direction property which
supports primary and secondary directions is unnecessarily complicated. Remove it
and use only `Efl.Ui.Direction.direction` to select the fill direction.
Also, expanded the documentation.
Fixes T7962
Test Plan:
Everything builds and tests pass. Efl.Ui.Table elementary_test still work.
Examples need to be adjusted to stop using table_direction.
Reviewers: zmike, YOhoho, bu5hm4n, SanghyeonLee, Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: YOhoho
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7962
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8902
the pack interface is a general interface for how we pack things into a
container. the align and padding property has less to nothing to do with
this. Hence this commit splits the two properties into theire own
interface.
fix T7825
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8699
Summary:
>>! In T5301#110572, @jpeg wrote:
> Quick recap before I leave.
> ...
> ...
> - Pack interfaces - T5328
>
> Table does not need to inherit from "linear" (1d) layout: this brings unnecessary complexity, for a dubious use case.
We don't have linear layout policy of table(2d) layout. furthermore, i don't
think it will be clearly defined. it is enough for Efl.Pack_Table to support
`efl_pack` which work the same as `efl_pack_end`.
ref T5719, T5328
Test Plan:
- make
- elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
- elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table(linear api)'
Reviewers: zmike, woohyun, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, jpeg, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5719, T5328
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8420
it looks like people have been relying on Elementary.h to include
eo apis even though this obviously makes no sense
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8223
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
Summary:
these hints are not strictly size-related, so renaming them is more consistent
with their actual function
ref T7563
Depends on D7968
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, cedric, bu5hm4n
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7563
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7977
Summary:
If widget use both hint_align(HINT_FILL) and hint_max together, there is no way
to set to hint_align. See, elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box' -
"Button with a quite long text." button. you can control button position
using "Box align" slider, but this is not proper implementation. When there are
two widget which have hint_align(HINT_FILL) and hint_max, those positions are
determined by box_align rather than hint_align. it means widget align cannot be
set individually.
To solve this problem, this patch add hint_fill property. in order to avoid
conflict with legacy API named evas_object_size_hint_fill_set(), it only works
for EO widgets(made by efl_add).
Also, EFL_GFX_SIZE_HINT_FILL is removed.
@feature
Test Plan:
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Hermet, Jaehyun_Cho, raster, barbieri
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T3912
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7409
Summary:
Change name of 'grid' to 'table' for matching on common ui naming
and avoiding confusion with 'gengrid' and 'grid view'.
grid will be introduced as grid image view after.
Test Plan:
checked make & make install
checked make check - there are errors but not related with these changes.
checked make examples - there are errors in cxx but not related with these changes.
checked make discheck - failed
test in elementary_test with Efl.Ui.Table and Table_static.
Reviewers: raster, cedric, jpeg, felipealmeida
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5668
WooHyun Jung
Marcel Hollerbach
Xavi Artigas
Yeongjong Lee
Mike Blumenkrantz
Yeongjong Lee
Mike Blumenkrantz
SangHyeon Lee