there has been more than 1 month without any comment, i think this looks
fine now ?
The transition event is kept beta for now, as we have right now a
discussion about range that we might be able to use here.
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Reviewed-by: Jaehyun Cho <jae_hyun.cho@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D11135
This should convey better their intention of the setting taking
ownership of the passed value and the getter returning just a view to
them.
Fixes T8514
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10824
the spotlight now is setting the overall correct min and max size on
itself. Additionally, the page size is now clamped to the size of the
container.
Correct min size of the container is defined to the MAX min size of all
the content.
The correct max size of the container is defined to the MIN max size of
all the content.
ref T7991
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10766
before we inherited from layout, however the theme of the layout was
basically just the event part, and the holder part for the indicator.
The indicator part is going to be refactored into something else
anyways, since the indicator should be useable on other widgets as well.
Which means, only the event part is left, which is only used by the
scroller spotlight manager, (and now moved there).
With the move from this away we are saving round about 0.2KB of pure
edje accounting. Additionally, we are saving in perf 4% that is spend in
_efl_canvas_layout_efl_gfx_entity_size_set, which also makes this less
CPU intensive when resizing (Or even just starting is also enough).
ref T7991
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10765
this new API makes it possible to stop animations beeing executed in the
spotlight manager. (The logic in the spotlight managers itself are
already implemented).
The animation will also be frozen during construction time of the
spotlight.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10701
after playing arround with the widget, we found out that it feels quite
weird to have a index, where most of the time you work with widgets.
We might want to add syntax suger in the future to make it easier to
just jump to the next element, or to the previous, but that still is to
be decided.
The event and the communication to the spotlight manager are still left
to be used with the index, reason for this is, that we might need to
fill there an invalid pointer, if a deletion is triggering an animation,
which seems quite weird. That needs further discussing.
Docx have been updated, the sitemarks about the shifting of the
active_index can be removed, as the element is not subject of change
during content adds/deletes.
ref T7991
Reviewed-by: Jaehyun Cho <jae_hyun.cho@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9813
View is something that is expected in the context of MVVM, so using it somewhere else is
going to lead to some confusion. Spotlight does descrive the objective of all of this
widget in actually a more explicit way as they all give the spotlight to one sub widget
at a time.
I have also renamed the View_Manager to be just Manager as the View there wasn't useful.
Marcel Hollerbach
Lauro Moura
Xavi Artigas
Daniel Kolesa
Cedric BAIL