Get your seatbelt fastend! It is happening! AUTOTOOLS IS GONE NOW!
All praise to meson!
This time the final version, ci has been adjusted, and now does not try
anymore to build a removed buildsystem. However, the scripts in there
need cleaning up.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9027
a new shiny buildtool that currently completes in the total of ~ 4 min..
1 min. conf time
2:30 min. build time
Where autotools takes:
1:50 min. conf time
3:40 min. build time.
meson was taken because it went quite good for enlightenment, and is a traction gaining system that is also used by other mayor projects. Additionally, the DSL that is defined my meson makes the configuration of the builds a lot easier to read.
Further informations can be gathered from the README.meson
Right now, bindings & windows support are missing.
It is highly recommented to use meson 0.48 due to optimizations in meson
that reduced the time the meson call would need.
Co-authored-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7012
Depends on D7011
this greatly improves build times by improving parallelizing, though it
does introduce more BUILT_SOURCES usage which causes builds with cxx
bindings to take significantly longer
fix T7157
ref T7154
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6633
This reverts commit 135154303b.
Revert "efl: move signal events from efl.loop to efl.app"
This reverts commit 3dbca39f98.
Revert "efl: add test suite for efl_app"
This reverts commit 3e94be5d73.
Revert "efl: create Efl.App class, the parent of Efl.Loop"
This reverts commit 28fe00b94e.
Go back to before efl.app because I think this should be done with
superclassing here not a parent object. reasons?
1. multiple loops per single thread make no sense. so if multilpe loop
objects they wont be contained in a single app object and then deleted
like this.
2. the app object is not really sharable in this design so it cant be
accessed from other threads
3. it makes it harder to get the main loop or app object (well 2 func
calls one calling the other and more typing. it is longer to type and
more work where it is not necessary, and again it can't work from
other threads unless we go duplicating efl.app per thread and then
what is the point of splittyign out the signal events from efl.loop
then?)
etc.
it was using old API, updated, but still doesn't work as expected,
lots of warnings from children being left alive, all proxies are
reporting no properties...
when model dies, all children proxies should die as well, otherwise we
get on console:
```
CRI:eldbus lib/eldbus/eldbus_core.c:215 eldbus_shutdown() Alive TYPE_SYSTEM connection
ERR:eldbus lib/eldbus/eldbus_core.c:175 print_live_connection() conn=0x8219230 alive object=0x8276d50 net.connman of bus=net.connman
...
```
Also, all proxies are reporting no properties "(no properties yet)",
likely they are missing to fetch such... even if "--wait" to let it
run, no asynchronous properties are delivered, at least not triggering
EFL_MODEL_EVENT_PROPERTIES_CHANGED.
It has been discussed on the ML (thread: "[RFC] rename efl_self") and
IRC, and has been decided we should rename it to this in order to avoid
confusion with the already established meaning of self which is very
similar to what we were using it for, but didn't have complete overlap.
Kudos to Marcel Hollerbach for initiating the discussion and
fighting for it until he convinced a significant mass. :)
This commit breaks API, and depending on compiler potentially ABI.
@feature
Efl - efl_model_base changed to use eina_promise
Eio - eio_model use efl_model_base with promise
Eldbus - elddbus models use promise now
Elementary - elm_view_list and elm_view_form use new models with promise
updated all related examples and tests
I just ran my script (email to follow) to migrate all of the EFL
automatically. This commit is *only* the automatic conversion, so it can
be easily reverted and re-run.
While we used different variation of mkdir -p all over we also had spots
where we did not use the option. This is one step in trying to make our
build system ready for parallel install. Using something like -j 10 even
for the install should help to speed up our jenkins jobs as well as distcheck.
Summary:
Mainly from the examples but also from libunibreak and tests/eet.
I'm not sure if it's really worth to remove warnings from the examples
-- because it adds pedantic-ness to something supposed to be didatic,
but I leave for you guys to judge.
Reviewers: tasn, cedric
CC: felipealmeida, raster, smohanty, cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D896
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Marcel Hollerbach
Cedric BAIL
Mike Blumenkrantz
Cedric BAIL
Carsten Haitzler
Mike Blumenkrantz
Jean Guyomarc'h
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
Tom Hacohen
Stefan Schmidt
Felipe Magno de Almeida
Larry Jr
Daniel Zaoui
Guilherme Lepsch
Stefan Schmidt
Savio Sena
José Roberto de Souza
Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
José Roberto de Souza
Lucas De Marchi