In EFL we have multiple hirachies of parts. One in Efl.Layout namespace
(alias edje) and one in Efl.Ui namespace. The seperation of these two
makes sense from the perspective of hiding functionality. However, a
functionality that we want to have on both is: we want to be able to
check which type of part this is. In order to do so, this commit
introduces a common interface, which allows that.
This is required because eo is currently undergoing some works, where
only APIs on a object are allowed, that are also inheriting its type,
which is normal in OOP, but sometimes, due to the lack of limitation, we
did that. This commit resolves one more case of that.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D11516
Lots of EO files had the same information at the property and set/get level.
Removed the redundant bits, and moved to the property level the common ones.
Set and Get documentation should be used only to clarify setter-only or
getter-only behavior.
Eolian @properties should be documented at the property level, and
documentation at the setter or getter level should be left to setter-
or getter-specific comments. There is usually no need at all to have
setter- or getter- specific comments.
Also, a property is not a method so descriptions should match that.
This patch removes lots of duplicated text, and will allow enabling
by default the eolian check that ensures that properties have proper
property-level docs.
No functional changes.
This has been deprecated for a while and is not strictly necessary
- as a part of an effort to stabilize Eolian, remove this. Eolian
will eventually gain support for versioning and use a reversed
behavior (i.e. no NULL by default), but the API it wlll use for
that will be very different. Features can always be added, it's
much harder to drop them.
@feature
Summary: Previous @since tags have already been removed from eo files.
Test Plan: Everything builds, but stable classes now have Since tags in the docs.
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: bu5hm4n
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8446
Summary:
All legacy @since tags have already moved to the *.legacy.h files.
EO files are now devoid of @since tags (except some eldbus still
needed for legacy).
Upcoming patches will add @since 1.22 to those APIs which come out
of beta in this release.
APIs marked @beta do not need @since tags.
Test Plan: Everything builds, EO docs (like DocFX) have no Since tags.
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, lauromoura, cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8430
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8128
Summary:
Instead of surrounding all the #include "*.eo.h" lines in Efl.h
with #ifdef EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT, include these files unconditionally, but mark
all classes as @beta in the eo files.
This will allow taking them out of beta one by one as we deem them stable enough.
Otherwise, the current procedure involves moving the #include line out of the
ifdef block, which is cumbersome and messes include order.
Depends on D7950
Fixes T7692
Test Plan: Nothing changes
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, cedric
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7692
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7951
Initial results of our static analysis showed a bunch of unused
imports or imports used only for documentation references. In the
first case, remove entirely, in the second case, change to 'parse'
in order to keep references working.
The static analysis is not perfect and yields false negatives for
certain cases, so there will be a second batch later.
This allows to safely verify if a part exists, without triggering any
potential call to NULL object, or even requiring the efl_part() handle
to be created.
This is perfectly equivalent to edje_object_part_exists(), but
implemented by both edje object and elm layout.
Marcel Hollerbach
Xavi Artigas
Daniel Kolesa
Mike Blumenkrantz
Jean-Philippe Andre
Amitesh Singh