this seems wrong since it's using smart object geometry to determine
event-based positioning within an edje object. considering it from a user pov,
it definitely is wrong because why would you deselect items based on mouse
movement?
ref D2622
ref da81eff897
@fix
elm_widget_theme_object_get now return Elm_Theme_Apply enum not bools.
only ELM_THEME_APPLY_FAILED case, need to re-apply default item edje.
Signed-off-by: SangHyeon Lee <sh10233.lee@samsung.com>
_elm_gengrid_item_edge_check can have eo_it as NULL if none of widget item
is focused. This could happen if item_focus is not enabled on items.
test case: elm test -> gengrid 2 (enable only "focus hightligt set") and move focus.
@fix
Signed-off-by: Amitesh Singh <amitesh.sh@samsung.com>
If multi select mode is ELM_OBJECT_MULTI_SELECT_MODE_WITH_CONTROL and
user code try unselect a item and select another part which not
realized select callback calls twice in this case. For avoid this no
needs focus newly selected item.
@fix
Summary:
Change the item indexing to start 1 after reordering animation.
Change the logic of edge checking to get the row or col correctly.
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
Test Plan:
elementary_test -to gengrid2
append 6 items
enable the reorder mode
check reordering is working properly (4 to 1)
@fix
Reviewers: singh.amitesh, cedric
Subscribers: jehun.lim, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4676
The data class should be specified for debug purposes.
Also, this fixes invalid uses inside the smart object
implementation where it assumed that the smart data was part
of the eo data. It may not (legacy objects).
the pan object width can be different with object width,
because of padding and bar area, so we should using pan's width
instead of object width for mirrored calculation.
in elementary_test gengrid sample, you can see, when mirrored on,
the alignment is broken before merge this patch.
Signed-off-by: SangHyeon Lee <sh10233.lee@samsung.com>
Adding sizing eval when gengrid min width and height is changed,
so need to re-evaluate properly.
Signed-off-by: SangHyeon Lee <sh10233.lee@samsung.com>
Summary :
As the child of layout and scroll interface user,
gengrid need to support content min limit feature to set min size
by layout sizing eval.
Test Plan :
Set elm_scroller_content_min_limit to gengrid and get min size off
gengrid object.
Signed-off-by: SangHyeon Lee <sh10233.lee@samsung.com>
Summary:
Elm.Widget.event_callback_add conflicts with Efl.Object.event_callback_add.
To solve this problem, "widget_" prefix is added to methods starting with
"event".
Reviewers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4521
Summary:
The accessible name is char*, this could confuse API user.
If we provide user callback to get description, an user would return allocated string.
The usage of elm_interface_atspi_description_get/set should be same with elm_interface_atspi_name_get/set
Reviewers: lukasz.stanislawski, cedric, raster
Reviewed By: raster
Subscribers: stanluk, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4378
Summary:
The routine of checking edge of left side, divide position by row.
Since the result of fisrt item of last line is 1, that item was not checked as edge.
This patch is for fixing it.
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
Test Plan:
elementary_test -to gengrid2
append items (about 6)
horizontal mode on and item loop enable
check item loop is working properly
Reviewers: cedric, jpeg, Hermet, SanghyeonLee
Subscribers: jehun.lim, SanghyeonLee, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4358
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
Dimensions of gengrid items can be altered for
non homogenity.
Care must be taken however to set the homogenous
size for items using elm_gengrid_item_size_set().
In horizontal mode only the heights will change
and in vertical mode only the widths. Fixed dimension
will be as set with elm_gengrid_item_size_set().
This is forked by https://phab.enlightenment.org/D2422
Test Plan:
elementary_test -to "Gengrid Resized Items"
Current test program provides focus autoscroll
and item looping options.
Reviewers: raster
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4330
This is an override of efl_gfx_size_set. Same as before, the
order of operations matter so it is possible that a corner
case will break. In particular, legacy code was:
- intercept
- smart resize (do stuff), super, super, super
- evas object resize
The new code is more like:
- intercept
- super, super, super, evas object resize
- do stuff
But unfortunately this broke elm_widget (read: all widgets) as
the internal resize was done before the object resize. So,
inside the resize event cb, the resize_obj size would not match
the smart object size. >_<
This is an override of efl_gfx_position_set.
As for the other patches, I hope I didn't break anything.
A problem likely to happen is that the super call was inserted
too early or too late in the call flow. For instance:
_myclass_position_set(obj, x, y) {
position_set(super(obj), x, y);
position_get(obj, &prevx, &prevy);
do_something_with_delta_xy();
}
The above code flow is obvisouly wrong, but may have crept in this
patch (such a bug sneaked in inside smart object, breaking
everything at first).
Efl.Object.event_callback_call no longer calls legacy smart callbacks;
calling only event callbacks registered with the given event description
pointer.
Create the method Efl.Object.event_callback_legacy_call to inherit the old
behavior from Efl.Object.event_callback_call, calling both Efl.Object events
and legacy smart callbacks.
Update all other files accordingly in order to still supply legacy
callbacks while they are necessary.
This simply avoids calling functions on NULL objects, since
the previous patch would ERR out rather than silently ignore
the problem.
I just add explicit NULL checks before calling the functions,
so it's clear the object could be NULL (in the widget).
This removes some useless code in various places, where the
switch from eo_do() to standard function call was not properly
refactored.
This changes:
type ret = 0;
ret = my_eo_function();
return ret;
To:
return my_eo_function();
Summary:
After setting focus to disabled item, focus does not work properly.
It is necessary to consider disabled state of each item
when selecting next focused item.
Signed-off-by: Jehun Lim <jehun.lim@samsung.com>
Test Plan:
1. elementary_test -to 'gengrid disabled item focus'
2. check 'item select on focus disable'
3. move focus to disabled item
4. observe focus and compare before this patch
Reviewers: cedric
Subscribers: minkyu, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4115
Summary:
if trying to apply incorrect theme, widget apply default theme and return TRUE.
so there is no way to check it really apply correct theme.
To resolve this problem, _elm_theme_set return three type enum
* related history : 4ca3ef4514
* elm_object_style_set is public api, so I didn't change it.
* typedef name [ Theme_Apply ] is temporarily, please suggest better one.
@fix
Reviewers: singh.amitesh, herb, Hermet, cedric, jpeg, raster
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4073
This reverts commit 546ff7bbba.
It seems that eo_del() is useful and removing it was creating bugs.
The issue is that the way we defined parents in eo, both the parent and
the programmer share a reference to the object. When we eo_unref() that
reference as the programmer, eo has no way to know it's this specific
reference we are freeing, and not a general one, so in some
circumstances, for example:
eo_ref(child);
eo_unref(child); // trying to delete here
eo_unref(container); // container is deleted here
eo_unref(child); // child already has 0 refs before this point.
We would have an issue with references and objects being freed too soon
and in general, issue with the references.
Having eo_del() solves that, because this one explicitly unparents if
there is a parent, meaning the reference ownership is explicitly taken
by the programmer.
eo_del() is essentially a convenience function around "check if has
parent, and if so unparent, otherwise, unref". Which should be used when
you want to delete an object although it has a parent, and is equivalent
to eo_unref() when it doesn't have one.
Summary:
Currently when an item in gengrid is focused and if it is scrolled
off the viewport halfly and if it user clicks on it, it won't be
scrolled into viewport. Only non-focused items will be scrolled into
viewport when clicked.
Test Plan:
elementary_test -> Gengrid focus -> Click an item ->
Scroll it little bit out of viewport -> Click again
Reviewers: prince.dubey, shilpasingh, cedric, raster, SanghyeonLee
Subscribers: seoz, rajeshps, govi, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3977
We used to have eo_del() as the mirrored action to eo_add(). No longer,
now you just always eo_unref() to delete an object. This change makes it
so the reference of the parent is shared with the reference the
programmer has. So eo_parent_set(obj, NULL) can free an object, and so
does eo_unref() (even if there is a parent).
This means Eo no longer complains if you have a parent during deletion.
Marcel Hollerbach
Mike Blumenkrantz
Jean-Philippe Andre
SangHyeon Lee
Amitesh Singh
Umesh Tanwar
Vyacheslav Reutskiy
Minkyu Kang
Jee-Yong Um
Shinwoo Kim
Jee-Yong Um
Vitor Sousa
Tom Hacohen
Cedric BAIL
Daniel Juyung Seo
Jehun Lim
Jinyong Park
godly.talias