this commit merges common functions from efl_ui_multi_selectable and
efl_ui_multi_selectable_async. Additionally, the two different aspects
of accessing the elements in a multi_selectable widget (numerical or
object based) are now abstracted into interfaces called range_numeric and
range_object. numeric APIs are also prefixed with id's, so its possible
for one widget to implement both (if there will ever be the demand to do
that in future).
The main reason for this split is:
- there is no good common path between mvvm based multi_selectable and
object based multi_Selectable, so there is no way that both sides would
benefit, without the other one suffering.
- If we find later on the demand to implement both on one widget, we now
can fully do that
- Common API is available for both types, so its less API and less
confusion for the API user.
ref T7871
ref T8265
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10675
Summary:
This is not the end of fixing eolian errors. I need to keep fixing
more.
Test Plan:
1. export EOLIAN_ENFORCE_SINCE=1
2. ninja
Reviewers: q66, segfaultxavi, zmike, bu5hm4n, Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: Jaehyun_Cho, stefan_schmidt, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10370
multi_selectable_aync already changed name as
selected_iterator_new
so multi_selectable change name also for unity of API.
not sure about we need unselected_items_get in multi_selectable,
so skip to create new api for this time.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D10148
Summary:
its not much more, but a little bit. All other information about the
features in this widget can be found via the implemented interfaces.
ref T7881
ref T7870
Reviewers: segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7881, T7870
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9782
this is the first rename of the main widget, the renames of the test
suites will follow
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9408
this is not needed anymore, the grid items can also just inherit
directly from the items.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9395
this also reformats the example, removes
comments that are misleading, removes UI elements that have no purpose.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9384
@warn_unused in syntax is now called @no_unused - this is because
"warning about unused" is a C thing (or rather, an extension to C)
and various languages might want to use stricter behavior for this.
Its associated API does the reverse now - it lets you query whether
being unused is allowed at all. This is to match future behavior
of Eolian (once it supports versioning) that will likely reverse it.
@feature
Summary:
This clarifies a bit the whole Orientation vs. Direction confusion, at the
expense of longer names (Image_Orientation vs. Layout_Orientation).
Also, the interfaces are now adjectives (Orientable) and the enums have long
names (*_Orientation).
Pretty big patch, but no functional changes.
Relates to T7863
Test Plan:
Everything builds and passes tests.
Elementary_tests show same behavior, including the "inverted" widgets, which
are the only parts which received a bit of code changes.
Proof:
https://travis-ci.org/Enlightenment/efl/builds/536277282
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, cedric
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8946
Summary:
these widgets here are containers, means: they contain items that can be
clicked, but the container itself cannot be clicked. Later on, we should
introduce a new interface which contains events that reflect the clicked
event of theire items.
Depends on D8827
Reviewers: zmike, segfaultxavi, cedric
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8828
the pack interface is a general interface for how we pack things into a
container. the align and padding property has less to nothing to do with
this. Hence this commit splits the two properties into theire own
interface.
fix T7825
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8699
Summary:
Instead of surrounding all the #include "*.eo.h" lines in Efl.h
with #ifdef EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT, include these files unconditionally, but mark
all classes as @beta in the eo files.
This will allow taking them out of beta one by one as we deem them stable enough.
Otherwise, the current procedure involves moving the #include line out of the
ifdef block, which is cumbersome and messes include order.
Depends on D7950
Fixes T7692
Test Plan: Nothing changes
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, cedric
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7692
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7951
Summary:
A lot of new widgets are using the new Scrollmanager class, the instance of this class is then attached via composition to the widget. This is providing the implementation for Efl.Ui.Scrollbar & Efl.Ui.Scrollable_Interactive.
In the text widgets the same applies to the internal interactive text widgets.
The tags widget is using the text entry as composite, and thus provides efl.ui.text api.
The addition of those composite { } sections are removing the particular unimplemented APIs from the eolian errors.
ref T7652
Depends on D7737
Reviewers: zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7652
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7738
Summary:
Introduce new packable grid for Efl.Ui.Widget toolkits.
most of parts are same as Efl.Ui.List, and it also support Efl.Pack_Linear,
although it will not support Efl.Pack_Table, because item must be
arranged sequential orders.
Test Plan:
We will make the tests on efl ui test suite.
please test by make check.
Reviewers: Hermet, cedric, felipealmeida, eagleeye, woohyun
Reviewed By: Hermet, eagleeye
Subscribers: CHAN, bu5hm4n, cedric
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6985
Summary:
Change name of 'grid' to 'table' for matching on common ui naming
and avoiding confusion with 'gengrid' and 'grid view'.
grid will be introduced as grid image view after.
Test Plan:
checked make & make install
checked make check - there are errors but not related with these changes.
checked make examples - there are errors in cxx but not related with these changes.
checked make discheck - failed
test in elementary_test with Efl.Ui.Table and Table_static.
Reviewers: raster, cedric, jpeg, felipealmeida
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5668
When I first implemented the Efl.Container interface I made a mistake of
mixing "single slot" content API's with "multiple children" content
API's. This should fix that, by separating API's that are for a single
part and those that deal with a list of children.
Efl.Content: Single slot. This will be used a lot by efl_part()
objects, and for the default content of widgets (eg. the window
content).
Efl.Container: Multiple children. Used by lists, boxes, layouts
(edje/elm), etc...
I didn't see any class that implemented both interfaces (note: Layout
implements Container and Button implements Content, so technically
Button implements both through inheritance).
For now the eo_prefix is not changed in Efl.Container. I wonder if it
should be reset (to efl_container) or not. This would only affect the C
API.
Ref T5328
After talking with @eunue I realised that the way I'd first
implemented the box/grid "pack" API was simply too complicated.
I had tried to make it possible to change the layout function
at runtime, like good old evas box, but since there are no function
pointers in EO the final design was really convoluted.
If someone really needs to change the layout of a box at runtime,
just create your own subclass, or unpack all items and repack them
in a new box.
Note: there are still some issues with the layout params & flow
This renames some APIs from Efl.Pack in order to try and
make them more sensible. Feedback welcome.
Also, most APIs now return bool, where false is quite unlikely
to happen.
This removes Efl.Pack_Named which had a terrible name,
removes Elm.Container which should have been renamed
Efl.Ui.Container anyway, and introduces an interface
Efl.Container instead.
The hierarchy tree is now changed as objects don't inherit
from Efl.Container (it's an interface, not a regular class)
but only implement it. Obviously it is very easy to
reintroduce an Efl.Ui.Container parent class if we need it,
but I guess it should have some actual logic. It's basically
part of what Elm.Widget already does.
Some function names have been modified to look better in C
with the efl_content prefix.
@feature
- Children are now contents
- Efl.Pack_Layout is now a separate class and
merges Pack_Engine.
- Removed dumb class Efl.Pack_Item
- Updated docs
- Added pack_ or grid_ prefixes to some methods
Untested yet. Will need to add the common 3 classes:
- standard
- homogenous
- homogenous max_size
And then implement a true custom layout function, that
respects weights in a certain manner (need to define it
clearly).
This fixes the linear API usage with a table.
TODO:
- remove internal table (as it doesn't support layout funcs)
- implement multiple layout functions (regular, homogenous, ...)
This is only a partial implementation, work in progress.
The grid object should be a replacement for evas and elementary's
table and grid. Only the layout of items inside the container
is different, otherwise the API should be the same.
For now, this widget is based on an evas table but the full
layout logic will need to be reimplemented, eventually.
@feature