Summary:
What happened before is that we registered efl_ui_leyout_legacy for
"elm_layout", which is not that good, since checking a (lets say) elm_button, for the type "elm_layout" would result in false. The same is with elm_button.
fixes T7081
Reviewers: devilhorns, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7081
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6430
The interface efl_part_get should not be directly called from C, but the efl_part
wrapper should. It rely on efl_noref to properly destroy the object. Binding can
control the lifecycle of the reference the way they want by either calling the
wrapper or efl_part_get directly. It also means that the ugly ___efl_auto_unref_set
doesn't need to be exposed outside of EFL anymore.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6098
Summary:
when set/unset icon and text,
signal "elm,state,[part],visible/hidden" is emitted.
This is wrong because visible/hidden should be handled by
Efl.Gfx.visible, not Efl.Text nor Efl.Content.
This should be changed into elm,state,[part],set/unset"
All relating edc should be fixed.
Test Plan: run elementary_test->button, Efl.Ui.Button
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric, woohyun, Jaehyun_Cho
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5798
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
For now, how to check whether a widget is legacy or not
is to check flags in private data or static flag, which is set
during elm_legacy_add.
If Efl.Ui.Legacy interface is added, it can be easilly checked
by efl_isa(obj, EFL_UI_LEGACY_INTERFACE)
Reviewers: woohyun, jpeg, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: conr2d, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5748
Marcel Hollerbach
Cedric BAIL
Sungtaek Hong