Summary:
Mainly from the examples but also from libunibreak and tests/eet.
I'm not sure if it's really worth to remove warnings from the examples
-- because it adds pedantic-ness to something supposed to be didatic,
but I leave for you guys to judge.
Reviewers: tasn, cedric
CC: felipealmeida, raster, smohanty, cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D896
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric.bail@free.fr>
I added EET_DATA_DESCRIPTOR_ADD_MAPPING_BASIC because I need basic types in unions, and EET_DATA_DESCRIPTOR_ADD_MAPPING is only for structs.
I also modified the example with a float and a string.
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D313
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric.bail@samsung.com>
Tests are disabled by default, but they should be mandatory for
distcheck. So should be examples, we should have them to at least
compile.
As there is no way to force "make distcheck" to run "make examples",
I've created --enable-always-build-examples to make examples regular
noinst_PROGRAMS, being always compiled. distcheck will use that
option.
SVN revision: 82276
- remove EFL_LIBS and EFL_CFLAGS, use per-lib values that inherit
from EFL (general)
- add NAME_LDFLAGS and EFL_LDFLAGS for linker flags.
- LDADD (binaries) now use NAME_LDFLAGS instead of NAME_LIBS, as they
link to libname.la and that will pull in the libtool dependencies
SVN revision: 81915
I can't be sure that distcheck is fixed as the check of eet is failing.
I've disable the run of the eina test for now as it is *very* long. I'll
re-enable it once eet check is running flawlessly
SVN revision: 76772