As strlen() cannot accept NULL (segfaults), we should check for valid
key, keyname, and compose strings here before passing to strlen().
@fix
Signed-off-by: Chris Michael <cp.michael@samsung.com>
Small patch to reduce calls to strlen when sending key events. This
patch is loosely based on Phab D5567
@fix
Signed-off-by: Chris Michael <cp.michael@samsung.com>
Summary:
When theme is applied text is reset and cursor position is set to 0.
This patch is recover the position to previous after text is reset.
Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang <mk7.kang@samsung.com>
Reviewers: cedric, jpeg, woohyun, herdsman
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5695
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
If a file path and key string was passed to elm_bg, we could get
the same file path and key string. Even if it failed to load the image file.
And the file path also remained its original form.
ex) Setting file path "~/image.png" => Getting file path "~/image.png"
(Not "/home/user_name/image.png")
@fix
Test Plan: Included in elementary test suite.
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric, raster
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: woohyun
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5823
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
"aborted": The escape key was pressed on a single line entry. (since 1.7)
"activated": The enter key was pressed on a single line entry.
Reviewers: id213sin, jpeg, cedric, herdsman
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5728
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
We've been missed type of class name.
Add legacy class name to maintain compatibility.
@fix
Reviewers: jpeg, woohyun, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5749
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
Instead of including the legacy header on the main header, just include
it where it is actually used (diff_widget.c), like in elm_code_widget.c.
Test Plan: Try to compile edi with the tarball from `make dist`. It should not fail with elm_code related errors.
Reviewers: raster, stefan_schmidt, felipealmeida
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5807
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
this commit add null check logic on evas_object_smart_attach
because a segmentation fault occurs once the argument is not valid (eg. null).
Test Plan:
1. invoke evas_object_smart_add(obj, NULL)
2. see the application crashes
Reviewers: woohyun, cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5817
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
I did it wrong.
The "Elm_Multibuttonentry_Format_Cb" should be maintain for legacy.
efl_ui_XXX has to use efl_format interface.
@fix
Test Plan: elementary_test->multibuttonentry sample.
Reviewers: cedric, woohyun, Jaehyun
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5824
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
Increasing offset as 2 for next map points is wrong.
If evas tries to draw for wrong combination of map points,
it can cause wrong results. Actually, every drawing code for
map points use and increase offset as 4.
@fix
Test Plan:
A test case for textpach is modified for testing this issue.
1. Run elementary_test with sync render mode.
ex) ECORE_EVAS_FORCE_SYNC_RENDER=1 elementary_test
2. Open textpath test.
3. Set a short text by clicking newly added check box.
4. (It will show another issues... So,) change slice number to update textpath properly.
5. See some noises at top-left side of text.
It is drawn from the two of end map points to the two of empty(not used) map points.
Reviewers: raster, cedric, jpeg, jypark
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5833
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
Improve the verbage in the doxygen comments. Refer to the value being
changed as the 'previous' rather than the 'old' value, to be more
precise. Drop the phrase 'keeping API sane' as it is unnecessary and
is an odd thing to say. Try to avoid referring to 'your program' as we
shouldn't assume the reader's situation.
Reviewers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5834
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
'thiz' is not commonly used in EFL, more commonly used is a word or
abbreviation that is descriptive of the object being used ('hash' for
Eina_Hashes, 'str' for Eina_Strings, 'array' for Eina_Arrays, etc.)
Follow this convention by using 'rect' (as used already in various
places) instead of 'thiz' or 'r'.
Reviewers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5836
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
For all routines that can return NULL on error, mention this in the
function's @return docs. In cases where a small number of situations
result in this return, move the docs to the @return; in other cases just
state the NULL return briefly and leave the elaboration in the body.
Reviewers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5837
Signed-off-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
so this is then inconsistent with efl.exe and efl.thread, so go back
to being normal with 0'th arg being the binary itself jsut to make
sure we have conistent usage.
this adds a simple indata and outdata void ptr to begin that you can
set on efl.thread objects (set the indata) and get the outdata too to
get results. then on the efl.appthread side the indata is set on the
efl.appthread before it runs and on quit the thresad can set the
outdata on the appthread, and this appears back on the efl.thread
object in the parent thread.
so you can basically share pointers to anything in and out this way on
start/exit in addition to string args etc.
the reason i made it an extra class (mixin actually) is for future
expansion. sharing more complex data - eina values maybe or objects as
long as they are shared objects, and perhaps acting as an interface
for calling a function at the other end like ecore_thread_async_call
etc.
ok. i can't find the root cause because all i have is a backtrace from
ApBBB and he says he can't reproduce it and i know im->cache is
null... if i could reproduce ... i'd be hunting the root cause. but
the best i can do is check for null im->cvache ptrs and be safe.
crashes are bad. especially for end users.
Seems Linux would munmap a lump of coal without failing. Make
sure the pointers match. Again bogus unmap not detected by
valgrind and not failing.
@fix T5949
so there is something broken in the complect efl promise/loop promise
that the clear of promises on loop destroy is clearing
promises/futures that have already triggered (loop timer ones). i've
spent enough time figuring out that it is happening.
_efl_loop_timeout_del() simple doenst ensure the future in
pending_futures for that promise is removed from the list. getting the
future from the promise handle is an exercise in pain... so i'm not
continuing with that path and will just ignore it.
but for now filling the promise data with null at least means if the
menory is re-used after free it wont see garbage freed ptrs and get
nulls so its easier to track.
1 test was wrong. it didn't wait for the thread to exit before checking
msg count recieved. fixed. race condition here.
also reduce the sheer message counts sent - it makes the suite take a
lot longer than is sane and als consume massive amounts of log space
in /tmp as a result.
rthe ecore file download test was downloading from sf.net ... and i
noticed sf.net refusing thus the ecore tests suite failing... i
changes it to grab a file (rss.php which is disabled for us but there)
so at least enlightenment.org has it.
better would be to spawn a webserver and test against that locally.
but thats a whole other level of work.
so it was listening for cb adds and dels... and or del of any cb
except the cb add/del catcher was done.. it would fail...
but ... the test actually added other cbs than this ... like:
efl_event_callback_array_priority_add(obj, _eo_signals_callbacks(),
-100, (void *) 1);
a while array of cb's:
{ EV_A_CHANGED, _eo_signals_a_changed_cb },
{ EV_A_CHANGED, _eo_signals_a_changed_cb2 },
{ EV_A_CHANGED, _eo_signals_a_changed_never },
{ EFL_EVENT_DEL, _eo_signals_efl_del_cb });
none of which were _eo_signals_cb_added_deled. i am amazed it passed
before...
now switch its checks to check for itself and then check for anything
BUT itself...
so the MAIN loop is actually an efl.app object. which inherits from
efl.loop. the idea is that other loops in threads will not be efl.app
objects. thread on the creator side return an efl.thread object.
inside the thread, like the mainloop, there is now an efl.appthread
object that is for all non-main-loop threads.
every thread (main loop or child) when it spawns a thread is the
parent. there are i/o pipes from parnet to child and back. so parents
are generally expected to, if they want to talk to child thread, so
use the efl.io interfaces on efl.thread, and the main loop's elf.app
class allows you to talk to stdio back to the parent process like the
efl.appthread does the same using the efl.io interfaces to talk to its
parent app or appthread. it's symmetrical
no tests here - sure. i have been holding off on tests until things
settle. that's why i haven't done them yet. those will come back in a
subsequent commit
for really quick examples on using this see:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/F2983118https://phab.enlightenment.org/F2983142
they are just my test code for this.
Please see this design document:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/efl-loops-threads/
This reverts commit 135154303b.
Revert "efl: move signal events from efl.loop to efl.app"
This reverts commit 3dbca39f98.
Revert "efl: add test suite for efl_app"
This reverts commit 3e94be5d73.
Revert "efl: create Efl.App class, the parent of Efl.Loop"
This reverts commit 28fe00b94e.
Go back to before efl.app because I think this should be done with
superclassing here not a parent object. reasons?
1. multiple loops per single thread make no sense. so if multilpe loop
objects they wont be contained in a single app object and then deleted
like this.
2. the app object is not really sharable in this design so it cant be
accessed from other threads
3. it makes it harder to get the main loop or app object (well 2 func
calls one calling the other and more typing. it is longer to type and
more work where it is not necessary, and again it can't work from
other threads unless we go duplicating efl.app per thread and then
what is the point of splittyign out the signal events from efl.loop
then?)
etc.
Cedric Bail
Chris Michael
Daniel Kolesa
Marcel Hollerbach
Amitesh Singh
Carsten Haitzler
Minkyu Kang
Youngbok Shin
Jeonghyun Yun
Woochan Lee
Lauro Moura
Wonki Kim
Bryce Harrington
Derek Foreman
Vincent Torri
Al Poole