Summary:
remove a lot of duplicated code and make this test suite read more like
all the other suites
fix T6813
Depends on D6247
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt, bu5hm4n, ManMower, devilhorns
Reviewed By: bu5hm4n, ManMower
Subscribers: Hermet, bu5hm4n, cedric, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T6813
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6248
efl_check.h must be included and the EFL_START/END_TEST macros must be
used in place of normal START/END_TEST macros
timing is enabled when TIMING_ENABLED is set
https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/improve_tests/
Reviewed-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@osg.samsung.com>
This reverts commit 135154303b.
Revert "efl: move signal events from efl.loop to efl.app"
This reverts commit 3dbca39f98.
Revert "efl: add test suite for efl_app"
This reverts commit 3e94be5d73.
Revert "efl: create Efl.App class, the parent of Efl.Loop"
This reverts commit 28fe00b94e.
Go back to before efl.app because I think this should be done with
superclassing here not a parent object. reasons?
1. multiple loops per single thread make no sense. so if multilpe loop
objects they wont be contained in a single app object and then deleted
like this.
2. the app object is not really sharable in this design so it cant be
accessed from other threads
3. it makes it harder to get the main loop or app object (well 2 func
calls one calling the other and more typing. it is longer to type and
more work where it is not necessary, and again it can't work from
other threads unless we go duplicating efl.app per thread and then
what is the point of splittyign out the signal events from efl.loop
then?)
etc.
It has been discussed on the ML (thread: "[RFC] rename efl_self") and
IRC, and has been decided we should rename it to this in order to avoid
confusion with the already established meaning of self which is very
similar to what we were using it for, but didn't have complete overlap.
Kudos to Marcel Hollerbach for initiating the discussion and
fighting for it until he convinced a significant mass. :)
This commit breaks API, and depending on compiler potentially ABI.
@feature
The legacy Eio_File factory functions are replaced by an Eo object
called Eo_Job that return promises wrapping the async file operations.
With this commit, the legacy Eio callbacks are replaced by the following
Eo/Promises counterparts :
* Done_Cb -> Promise then success callback
* Error_Cb -> Promise then error callback
* Main_Cb -> Promise progress callback
* Filter_Cb -> Job object event (more below)
Events are used to deliver and get the filter data. To differentiate
between the named and direct versions, they come in "filter,direct" and
"filter,name" versions.
Monitors were wrapped inside a new class Eo_Sentry.
The user creates a sentry object and adds monitoring targets to it,
listening to events on it.
The sentry event info is composed of two strings. The source string
is the path being monitored, i.e. the one passed to eio_sentry_add, and
the trigger string is the path that actually triggered the event, e.g.
a new file created in a monitored directory.
When these changes got it with 0c76f82a31
they used the non existing symbols ecore_promise_value_get and
ecore_promise_then (most likely due to an unfinished refactoring)
Make sure we actually use the correct eina_promise_ symbols and add NULL
for the error callback which is now needed.
Efl - efl_model_base changed to use eina_promise
Eio - eio_model use efl_model_base with promise
Eldbus - elddbus models use promise now
Elementary - elm_view_list and elm_view_form use new models with promise
updated all related examples and tests
I just ran my script (email to follow) to migrate all of the EFL
automatically. This commit is *only* the automatic conversion, so it can
be easily reverted and re-run.
Carsten Haitzler
Mike Blumenkrantz
Cedric BAIL
Mike Blumenkrantz
Felipe Magno de Almeida
Tom Hacohen
Lauro Moura
Larry Jr
Stefan Schmidt
Vincent Torri