We are iterating EINA_INLIST_REVERSE_FOREACH(list, obj) in a recursive
function. Don't mark the other objects as havemap_parent if the first
in the list has it.
SVN revision: 52403
The solution is that we only delete invisible standalones now, not visible ones, this is correct intuitively and of course fixes the bug.
SVN revision: 52302
I removed a function that caused the issue and made no sense at all, honestly, it didn't make any sense.
I did a lot of testing trying to see if there are any new bugs after the fix, and nothing, so I guess my instincts were correct.
Please if you can, check out the removed function (_layout_walk_back_to_item_word_redo) and see if it makes any sense to you, if it does, please let me know.
SVN revision: 52243
Add two new canvas level callbacks: OBJECT_FOCUS_IN/OUT
As we already had callbacks for objects gaining or losing focus, then
two more for the Canvas, now we can have the entire Evas be notified when
any object changes its focused status. The object in question is passed
as the event_info for the callback.
SVN revision: 52196
Assert cache->usage never becomes negative as was occurring before the
fix in r52149.
Just in time, the fix in r52149 was made by Ulisses, not me.
SVN revision: 52190
Memory usage was not accounted right because
cache->func.mem_size_get(ie) returns 0 when called after
cache->func.destructor(ie). Thus the total memory used, kept on
cache->usage, is never decremented in _evas_cache_image_remove_activ()
This implies that cache->usage will keep growing and eventually it will
overflow, becoming negative. So evas_cache_image_flush() will not do its
job because cache->limit (assumed to be positive) will not be less than
cache->usage anymore. So the total memory allocated will start to grow
and the limit won't be respected.
Strictly speaking, it's not a leak, since all the memory will be
eventually freed when evas shutdown is called, but the program might be
killed by over allocating memory. This is caught by valgrind with the
massif tool. The graphic below shows that in the end a huge memory amount
is allocated. This is the moment when cache->usage became negative.
MB
26.04^ #
| #::::
| #::::
| #::::
| #::::
| #::::
| #::::
| #::::
| #::::
| #::::
| #::::
| #::::
| #::::
| #::::
| #::::
| #::::
| #::::
| #::::
| :::::::::::::::::@@:::::::::@:::@::::::@::::::::::::::::::::::::::#::::
| : ::: ::: ::: :::@ :: ::: : @:: @:: :::@: :: ::: : : :: :: : ::: :#::::
0 +----------------------------------------------------------------------->Gi
0 54.83
This patch is a one line fix, which swaps the calls to
_evas_cache_image_remove_activ() and cache->func.destructor() making
cache->limit to be respected.
SVN revision: 52149
Lowering priority was wrong. Some bugs:
1) You don't lower the priority by setting the scheduler policy to some
of the real-time ones (SCHED_RR or SCHER_FIFO). If you do so, you are
actually increasing the priority of the workers and your main thread
you be preempted and stalled until the workers complete their job.
Fortunately this will only happen if your programming is running as
root, as normal users (without CAP_SYS_NICE) are unable to set
priority to real-time values.
2) setpriority() and getpriority() are not part of pthread and you can't
use the id returned by pthread. Manpage explicitly says so on
pthread_self(3):
"The thread ID returned by pthread_self() is not the same thing as the
kernel thread ID returned by a call to gettid(2)."
Since glibc does not have a gettid, here we are using
syscall(SYS_gettid)
This patch was tested with the program below. Compile and run:
$ gcc p_hello2.c -o p_hello2 -lpthread
$ ./p_hello2 10
You'll see that the main thread remains with its priority and threads
created by the main thread change their own niceness.
#include <errno.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <sched.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/resource.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
/* Lower priority of current thread.
*
* It's used by worker threads so they use up "bg cpu" as it was really intended
* to work. If current thread is running with real-time priority, we decrease
* our priority by 5. This is done in a portable way. Otherwise we are
* running with SCHED_OTHER policy and there's no portable way to set the nice
* level on current thread. In Linux, it does work and it's the only one that is
* implemented.
*/
static void
_ecore_thread_pri_drop(void)
{
struct sched_param param;
int pol, prio, ret;
pid_t tid;
pthread_t pthread_id;
pthread_id = pthread_self();
ret = pthread_getschedparam(pthread_id, &pol, ¶m);
if (ret)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Unable to query sched parameters\n");
return;
}
if (pol == SCHED_RR || pol == SCHED_FIFO)
{
prio = sched_get_priority_max(pol);
param.sched_priority += 5;
if (prio > 0 && param.sched_priority > prio)
param.sched_priority = prio;
pthread_setschedparam(pthread_id, pol, ¶m);
}
#ifdef __linux__
else
{
tid = syscall(SYS_gettid);
errno = 0;
prio = getpriority(PRIO_PROCESS, tid);
if (errno == 0)
{
prio += 5;
if (prio > 19)
prio = 19;
setpriority(PRIO_PROCESS, tid, prio);
}
}
#endif
}
/*
* p_hello.c -- a hello program (in pthread)
*/
#define MAX_THREAD 1000
typedef struct {
int id;
} parm;
void *hello(void *arg)
{
parm *p=(parm *)arg;
pid_t tid;
int prio;
tid = syscall(SYS_gettid);
printf("[%d] Hello from node %d\n", tid, p->id);
pthread_yield();
printf("[%d] HELLO!\n", tid);
_ecore_thread_pri_drop();
prio = getpriority(PRIO_PROCESS, tid);
printf("[%d] New nice value: %d\n", tid, prio);
return (NULL);
}
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
int n,i;
pthread_t *threads;
pthread_attr_t pthread_custom_attr;
parm *p;
pid_t tid;
int prio;
if (argc != 2)
{
printf ("Usage: %s n\n where n is no. of threads\n",argv[0]);
exit(1);
}
n=atoi(argv[1]);
if ((n < 1) || (n > MAX_THREAD)) {
printf ("The no of thread should between 1 and %d.\n",MAX_THREAD);
exit(1);
}
threads = (pthread_t *)malloc(n * sizeof(*threads));
pthread_attr_init(&pthread_custom_attr);
p = (parm *)malloc(n * sizeof(parm));
/* Start up thread */
tid = syscall(SYS_gettid);
for (i=0; i<n; i++) {
prio = getpriority(PRIO_PROCESS, tid);
printf("[%d] root thread nice value: %d\n", tid, prio);
p[i].id=i;
pthread_create(&threads[i], &pthread_custom_attr, hello, (void *)(p+i));
}
/* Synchronize the completion of each thread. */
for (i=0; i<n; i++) {
pthread_join(threads[i],NULL);
}
free(p);
return 0;
}
SVN revision: 52040
done. working. now... still 1 more bug. seems to be a changed flag bug
too in dlip 2 test in scrolling list after map anim finished. smaller
bug to deal with now. ugh. bug one bug to the other
SVN revision: 51849
it? and... lets not just throw pointer onto pipelines just for the
hell of it.. as like.. hmm the object owning the pointer might be
freed before pipelien finishes.. or hell. it might change pointer
contents? :) need to nwo dup bidi intl_props. probably a better plan..
tasn looking at you... is to fix up evas bidi utils and make the intl
props a new/free thing (and sharable eh?) with reference counts to
avoid dups (just ref up most of the time - and if u change, make a new
intl prop - dont change current one) etc. etc. for now dup - this
gives a perf hit tho. at least async rendering works now.
SVN revision: 51736
The offending projects were:
E16/e/src/backgrounds.c | 10 ++++------
PROTO/eon/src/lib/layout/eon_stack.c | 4 +---
ecore/src/lib/ecore_win32/ecore_win32.c | 3 +--
ecore/src/lib/ecore_wince/ecore_wince.c | 3 +--
edje/src/lib/edje_edit.c | 3 +--
evas/src/lib/cache/evas_cache_image.c | 2 +-
exalt/src/lib/libexalt_private.c | 2 +-
This patch assumes code in these places were insane and the fix is to remove
one condition check. Most likely this is not true, but there's no automatic fix
for that.
Looking at the patch, it seems that some places should use "x" and "y" vars but
used just one of them and therefore they were caught by coccinelle.
SVN revision: 51666
Lucas De Marchi
Tom Hacohen
Iván Briano
Carsten Haitzler
Brett Nash
Christopher Michael
Vincent Torri
Chidambar Zinnoury
Sebastian Dransfeld