Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I made a patch for elm_genlist_fields_update to selective content
update.
> a genlist item can update any content regardless of its mode.
>
> Thanks.
>
> PS: It assumed my previous patch is applied ([patch] elm_genlist -
> split flip content from item's content)
SVN revision: 69944
Current Issue:
Currently when we add a widget to window as a sub-object, e.g.
elm_notify_add(win) which internally calls elm_widget_sub_object_add
then the focus chain using <TAB> includes only
the first focusable subitem of the widget, not all.
Whereas with elm_win_resize_object_add, it works fine and cycles to
all focusable sub-items of the widget.
Reason:
The reason is that we are appending sub-object to the list in
elm_win which is used for focus chain, only in case of
elm_win_resize_object_add.
Change Description:
Added a new API: EAPI Eina_List
*elm_widget_sub_object_list_get(const Evas_Object *obj);
This API returns the list of sub-objects of an elementary widget
(sd->subobjs) where sd is Smart_Data pointer obtainted using
elm_widget_smart_data_get(obj).
We have used this API in elm_win for focus_next_hook implementation.
Signed-Off-By: RAJEEV RANJAN<rajeev.r>@samsumg.com>
SVN revision: 69943
When pasting data to entry, notify_handler_text sent incorrect string.
Because notify_handler_text received string including garbage value.
I cut string as its data length.
Signed-By-Off: Minseok Kim <minseok3.kim@samsung.com>
SVN revision: 69942
Dear ALL,
If the block that must be removed/freed, it has already removed/freed in
_item_block_del.
So I removed the code in _clear_cb.
Thanks
Joey
Submitted-By-Off ChankWook Jung<jchanwook@gmail.com>
SVN revision: 69929
Revert "elm bin: Use convenient utility function elm_win_util_standard_add() instead of elm_win_add() + elm_bg_add(). This is for normal style (ELM_WIN_BASIC) window."
This reverts commit 31b24a0edb0028528d7c859070e03236ba42867b.
SVN revision: 69847
Change Description:
- Year min/max values are moved to elm_config.
- Format specifier must come along with % followed by any separator. ( % 123d is not supported but %d will denote Date format specifier)
- Field separator can constitute multiple spaces, Space followed by any other non format specifier is also treated as the separator till its max length. ( %d x/ %b #2 format displays 27 x/ Mar #2 )
Thanks, Sumanth
Submitted-By-Off Sumanth Krishna Mannam<sumanth.m@samsung.com>
SVN revision: 69846
Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I talked with seoz. and agreed with previous naming changing is
insufficient.
>
> so changed like this
> "mode_" -> "deco_it_"
> "edit_" -> "deco_all_"
>
> Thanks
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Hyoyoung Chang <hyoyoung@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> After edit mode naming is changed, some legacy naming is remained.
>> I changed naming to follow API naming changes.
>>
>> "edit_" -> "deco_"
>> and also some explicit edc part names are changed.
>>
>> Some naming are remained as is, I'll fix at next patches.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
SVN revision: 69836
for this change.
Revert "After edit mode naming is changed, some legacy naming is remained."
This reverts commit 5e1aa3c8b0382a0ca471150f4c219cd32dbdbe22.
SVN revision: 69835
I changed naming to follow API naming changes.
"edit_" -> "deco_" and also some explicit edc part names are changed.
Some naming are remained as is, I'll fix at next patches.
SVN revision: 69793
Subject: [E-devel] [patch][elementary] elc_popup, restack issue
The elc_popup does not raise to the top of its layer even though
evas_object_raise() is called with the popup object.
Because the elm_widget_resize_object_set(); makes notify object which is
internally used in the popup have a smart parent.
Ultimately, the callback function for EVAS_CALLBACK_RESTACK of the
notify
is not called.
So I removed elm_widget_resize_object_set(); from the popup and added
some
implementations to show the popup properly.
Moreover, I have added test code also in the attached patch. Then,
please
review the patch and give any feedbacks. Thanks.
SVN revision: 69790