This reverts commit 8a988717e1.
It seems we can't actually inherit from class more than once and neither eo
nor eolian will complain about it. You will just get random weird behavior.
This patch should come back once we have made an interface of edje.
This reverts commit 57d77c9041.
We are in freeze right now and this is a new feature. Considering the access
API is still in beta I might have let this slip by but its does not even build
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:27:1: error: conflicting types for ‘elm_object_part_access_object_get’
START_TEST (elm_object_part_access_object_get)
^
In file included from ../../../src/lib/elementary/Elementary.h:240:0,
from ../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:6:
../../../src/lib/elementary/elm_object.h:521:54: note: previous declaration of ‘elm_object_part_access_object_get’ was here
EAPI Evas_Object *elm_object_part_access_object_get(const Evas_Object *obj, const char *part);
^
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c: In function ‘elm_object_part_access_object_get’:
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:39:47: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘elm_object_part_access_object_get’ makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
access = elm_object_part_access_object_get(popup, "access.title");
^
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:27:1: note: expected ‘int’ but argument is of type ‘Evas_Object * {aka struct _Eo_Opaque *}’
START_TEST (elm_object_part_access_object_get)
^
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:39:13: error: too many arguments to function ‘elm_object_part_access_object_get’
access = elm_object_part_access_object_get(popup, "access.title");
^
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:27:1: note: declared here
START_TEST (elm_object_part_access_object_get)
^
../../../src/tests/elementary/elm_test_popup.c:39:11: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
access = elm_object_part_access_object_get(popup, "access.title");
^
Makefile:43996: recipe for target 'tests/elementary/tests_elementary_elm_suite-elm_test_popup.o' failed
make[5]: *** [tests/elementary/tests_elementary_elm_suite-elm_test_popup.o] Error 1
If you still want this in make sure it actually can compile the tests you added.
This lets me narrow down the remaining cases of pointers across the EFL.
The void pointers will later need to be reevaluated on per-case basis and
replaced appropriately where possible/feasible.
This touches Edje and also Elementary where part names are used.
This commit blew up in size since now all content part APIs
(get, set, unset) require to use Efl.Part instead.
This is a big refactoring commit, but no logic should
have been changed. Fingers crossed.
Complex types (i.e. list, array, hash, accessor etc.) now do not require
pointers with them anymore (the pointer is implied) and the same goes for
class handles. Eolian now explicitly disallows creating pointers to these
as well. This is the first part of the work to remove pointers from Eolian
completely, with the goal of simplifying the DSL (higher level) and therefore
making it easier for bindings (as well as easier API usage).
@feature
Previously events used to use class name as a prefix and ignored eo_prefix
when specified. This is no longer the case. Events follow eo_prefix by default
now. In order to get around this for classes where this is undesirable, a new
field event_prefix was added which takes priority over eo_prefix. If neither
is specified, class name is used like previously.
@feature
This removes Efl.Pack_Named which had a terrible name,
removes Elm.Container which should have been renamed
Efl.Ui.Container anyway, and introduces an interface
Efl.Container instead.
The hierarchy tree is now changed as objects don't inherit
from Efl.Container (it's an interface, not a regular class)
but only implement it. Obviously it is very easy to
reintroduce an Efl.Ui.Container parent class if we need it,
but I guess it should have some actual logic. It's basically
part of what Elm.Widget already does.
Some function names have been modified to look better in C
with the efl_content prefix.
@feature
This removes the conflicts between the different parents and also
indicates that this is to be used internally by widgets and should
not be confused with the normal user visible parent.
It is an internal attribute that should not be used by people
not implementing widgets. Marking it as protected signifies it
as such.
Summary:
Popup has the main layout to show popup view, but it is not resize object of popup.
As the result, we cannot emit the signal to the main layout when we want to change the state of the popup.
So, popup inherited a layout signal emit and redirect the signal to the main layout.
Test Plan:
1. add the custom signal in elm/popup/base/default layout
2. send the custom siganl in application code
Reviewers: woohyun, raster, cedric, Hermet, singh.amitesh
Reviewed By: singh.amitesh
Subscribers: jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3852
Stefan Schmidt
Tom Hacohen
Cedric Bail
Shinwoo Kim
Jee-Yong Um
Jean-Philippe Andre
Daniel Kolesa
Taehyub Kim