From 3e3a13657f0f361d3216271ef1e4c854716cc4d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:29:51 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] prefer eeze backlight setting over randr: more accurate
 supposedly fixes ticket #1015 (yakov ping me if this is somehow not fixing
 it)

SVN revision: 73526
---
 src/bin/e_backlight.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/bin/e_backlight.c b/src/bin/e_backlight.c
index 18282df19..f7ebfafd6 100644
--- a/src/bin/e_backlight.c
+++ b/src/bin/e_backlight.c
@@ -298,6 +298,15 @@ _e_backlight_update(E_Zone *zone)
    int num = 0;
 
    root = zone->container->manager->root;
+#ifdef HAVE_EEZE
+   _bl_sys_find();
+   if (bl_sysval)
+     {
+        sysmode = MODE_SYS;
+        _bl_sys_level_get();
+        return;
+     }
+#endif
    // try randr
    out = ecore_x_randr_window_outputs_get(root, &num);
    if ((out) && (num > 0) && (ecore_x_randr_output_backlight_available()))
@@ -308,17 +317,6 @@ _e_backlight_update(E_Zone *zone)
         bl_val = x_bl;
         sysmode = MODE_RANDR;
      }
-#ifdef HAVE_EEZE
-   else
-     {
-        _bl_sys_find();
-        if (bl_sysval)
-          {
-             sysmode = MODE_SYS;
-             _bl_sys_level_get();
-          }
-     }
-#endif
 }
 
 static void