cpufreq: fix a VERY misleading comment.
This commit is contained in:
parent
100121bd64
commit
721380cb1e
|
@ -718,9 +718,10 @@ _cpufreq_status_check_available(Cpu_Status *s)
|
||||||
s->frequencies = eina_list_sort(s->frequencies,
|
s->frequencies = eina_list_sort(s->frequencies,
|
||||||
eina_list_count(s->frequencies),
|
eina_list_count(s->frequencies),
|
||||||
_cpufreq_cb_sort);
|
_cpufreq_cb_sort);
|
||||||
|
/* sort is necessary because this can change and the order is reversed
|
||||||
|
* which breaks the theme. */
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* sort is not necessary because freq_levels is already sorted */
|
|
||||||
/* freebsd doesn't have governors */
|
/* freebsd doesn't have governors */
|
||||||
if (s->governors)
|
if (s->governors)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue